Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zohran Mamdani - Democratic Socialist Mayor of NYC

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dabrockster
    replied
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
    Brock just sharing every anti Mamdani article that his facebook feed spits out at him. The more he copies the links and pastes them here, the more links fb feeds him. He's essentially the dad in Wellness at this point.
    What’s a matter D-hole. Your pantries in a twist over another conservative voice is here..

    This is a reality and a policy that threatens private ownership. But go ahead and brush it off as trivial. Soo. Piss off..

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post

    If passed and then signed by Mamdani, I predict COPA will be struck down by the supreme court. Restrictions on alienability of property are not treated kindly.

    I will also add that I HOPE it is (1) not passed, and/or (2) struck down.
    Thanks. That was going to be my next question. How on earth is this stuff legal?

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by dabrockster View Post
    Community Opportunities Purchase Act (COPA). Multi-housing properties now must be registered with the city and the city has 30-day to respond. If they have a desire to purchase the property, it places the property on hold for an additional 120-days. If they decline, and you find a buyer, I believe the owner will still have to inform the city to give them a chance to purchase the property from the private owner.

    Sounds like another awesome policy for Mamdani. Was originally vetoed by previous mayor. And is not yet been brought back to be signed by Mamdani. Gonna guess it will be done this year..



    https://www.qchron.com/editions/quee...e16e793c1.html



    https://wabcradio.com/2026/01/07/nyc...ohran-mamdani/
    If passed and then signed by Mamdani, I predict COPA will be struck down by the supreme court. Restrictions on alienability of property are not treated kindly.

    I will also add that I HOPE it is (1) not passed, and/or (2) struck down.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
    Brock just sharing every anti Mamdani article that his facebook feed spits out at him. The more he copies the links and pastes them here, the more links fb feeds him. He's essentially the dad in Wellness at this point.
    Hey DB, ignore this. The COPA stuff was super interesting. I had never heard of that before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Donuthole
    replied
    Brock just sharing every anti Mamdani article that his facebook feed spits out at him. The more he copies the links and pastes them here, the more links fb feeds him. He's essentially the dad in Wellness at this point.

    Leave a comment:


  • dabrockster
    replied
    Community Opportunities Purchase Act (COPA). Multi-housing properties now must be registered with the city and the city has 30-day to respond. If they have a desire to purchase the property, it places the property on hold for an additional 120-days. If they decline, and you find a buyer, I believe the owner will still have to inform the city to give them a chance to purchase the property from the private owner.

    Sounds like another awesome policy for Mamdani. Was originally vetoed by previous mayor. And is not yet been brought back to be signed by Mamdani. Gonna guess it will be done this year..

    The bill has faced fierce opposition from Councilwoman Joann Ariola (R-Ozone Park), who said on X that “COPA is yet another attack on private real estate ownership in this city.

    “We’re sliding headfirst into a communist dystopia where the government and their apparatchik developers own all the property, and the rest of us get forced into perpetual rentorship.”

    Real estate developers and agents are similarly resistant. The New York State Association of Realtors, which represents over 61,000 real estate agents, said the bill “represents an unwarranted government intrusion into private real estate transactions that would likely establish unreasonable delays in the sale of residential buildings, negatively impacting buyers, sellers, real estate professionals, and state and city coffers,” in testimony submitted at a City Council hearing in June.

    At the same hearing, The Small Property Owners of New York, which represents more than 5,700 landlords, said in a statement that “This will be a slow and painful demise for small building owners, who will be sacrificed at the expense of politically connected non-profits that will benefit from the chaos and property devaluation that COPA will create.”
    https://www.qchron.com/editions/quee...e16e793c1.html

    Under COPA, landlords who want to sell their buildings must first navigate a new bureaucratic approval process, giving designated nonprofits priority access to properties before buyers on the open market. Critics argue the policy will depress property values, delay sales, and punish small owners – many of them immigrants and multi-generation families – who rely on real estate as their primary asset.

    While progressive activists celebrated outside City Hall, small property owners warned the law will drive even more landlords out of the city, further shrinking housing supply and worsening affordability – the opposite of what lawmakers claim to want.

    Reaction on X has been fierce. One user wrote, “NYC’s COPA is a massive government overreach. Mayor Mamdani is letting nonprofits jump the line to seize property while owners are stuck in 90 days of red tape. This kills the market and violates property rights. Socialism doesn’t fix housing, it just destroys the city.” Another commenter added bluntly, “Are we really that surprised? Elect a socialist (<cough>Communist<cough>). Get socialist (<cough>Communist<cough>) policy. Now your house is OUR house.”
    https://wabcradio.com/2026/01/07/nyc...ohran-mamdani/

    Leave a comment:


  • dabrockster
    replied
    Originally posted by tooblue View Post

    Because wealth disparity is the greatest threat to democracy.

    https://socialsciences.uchicago.edu/...s-around-world
    Found this quote to be spot-on to what we have endured over the past 15/20 years...

    “Backsliding leaders play on inequality and deepen polarization by encouraging a sense of grievance among the public, feelings of being left behind and alienation from elite institutions —backsliding leaders prey upon all of these,” Stokes says. They do so by finding different targets to blame for the inequality: Left wing, populist backsliders, for example, will blame corporations and economic leaders. Right-wing, ethno-nationalist backsliders might nurture grievances by blaming outsiders or immigrants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Omaha 680
    replied
    Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post

    Over the years, I did a lot of pro bono work for indigent tenants but for many years have also been a co-owner of a rent-controlled mobile home park, so I've looked at the issue a lot from both sides. One can make a case for the short-term benefits of rent control, but the evidence is overwhelming that long-term, the effects of rent control drive up housing costs for everyone. You're right that it's simple economics.

    I'm still scratching my head over Mamdani's "warmth of collectivism" line. I think he's a smart guy so why he would use a term used by Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and others is mystifying. Literally tens of millions of people were starved or murdered outright because of collectivist motives. But maybe for the first time in history it'll work.
    It's not that hard to understand. He's a legit communist. I'm not saying he's a direct fan of Stalin and Mao's methods, but he probably thinks they had good intentions. Just like we have to believe Trump and his inner circle when they say what they are, we also need to believe the far left. People like Mamdani are not hiding the ball like the DeBlasios of the world used to try to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by tooblue View Post

    Because wealth disparity is the greatest threat to democracy.

    https://socialsciences.uchicago.edu/...s-around-world
    Sounds like we need the warmth of collectivism to restore order and save democracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    I mean I am not sure you could have crafted a more complete communist if you had built her in a lab.

    These guys are stealing my material.


    Leave a comment:


  • tooblue
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    Help me understand why that matters.
    Because wealth disparity is the greatest threat to democracy.

    https://socialsciences.uchicago.edu/...s-around-world

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    This guy is pretty funny.

    Leave a comment:


  • BigPiney
    replied
    Originally posted by dabrockster View Post

    That didn’t age well. lol.

    IMG_7506.jpeg
    There's always a tweet.

    Leave a comment:


  • dabrockster
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    That didn’t age well. lol.

    IMG_7506.jpeg

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X