Zohran Mamdani - Democratic Socialist Mayor of NYC

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dabrockster
    replied
    Mamdani continues to show his true colors and hatred for Israel..

    Mamdani speaks at an event and calls anyone in opposition to him as “Monsters” and then specifically calls out AIPAC

    Mamdani:
    He said that “the monsters that we are up against, they take many different forms,” and then singled out AIPAC.

    He described the pro-Israel lobby as an organization “for whom the only thing more frightening than democracy being allowed to run its course is an end to genocide and Netanyahu’s wars.”

    Mamdani continued by alleging that AIPAC moves “millions in dark money to accomplish a single goal, to preserve their power so that they can turn us against one another instead of our leaders turning towards the moral change we all know to be necessary.”



    Ted Deutch had the following statement.

    After watching @NYCMayor's recent speech at a political rally, I wanted to offer these thoughts to him.

    Mayor Mamdani, referring to fellow New Yorkers as “monsters” is outrageous and dangerous, and the impact of your words extends far beyond politics.

    It’s not only about your repeated attacks on Israel and those who support it, now rooted in the oldest antisemitic conspiracy theories of secret control and nefarious agendas. It’s about politics and division. You are doing exactly what you falsely accuse others of doing.

    Your accusation, Mr. Mayor? Efforts “to turn us against one another instead of our leaders turning toward the moral change we all know to be necessary.”

    But when you use your position to label people you disagree with as monsters - people who live and work and pay taxes in the city you lead, people who loved the Knicks championship parade as much as you did, people who spent yesterday celebrating their fathers and grandfathers - you are turning people against one another.

    Your speech wasn’t just about preserving your power. By every measure, it was about growing that power by dividing New Yorkers.

    You want to debate ideas? Fine. But when you call people monsters, you’re not debating ideas, you’re dehumanizing the people you disagree with. And when that comes from a mayor, it creates an environment where people hear clearly who is being cast as outside the community, one where they wonder whether they can safely live and speak as themselves.

    You say we deserve leaders who lead with hope and not fear. We all agree. But what you did here is the opposite.

    No one should have to wonder whether they are safe expressing who they are or what they believe, whether they worship at shul, at a mosque, in a church, a gurudwara, or at a temple.

    Contributing to an environment in which people feel that fear is not leadership. It is exactly the kind of division you claim to oppose.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/livebl...ipac-monsters/

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    Originally posted by LVAllen View Post

    Patrick Ewing is named at 0:53 for dunking on the Pacers.

    completely missed that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • LVAllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
    He is really good at this. He almost makes me wish I was a New Yorker:



    But no love for Patrick Ewing? Seems like a miss from his speechwriter.
    Patrick Ewing is named at 0:53 for dunking on the Pacers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    He is really good at this. He almost makes me wish I was a New Yorker:



    But no love for Patrick Ewing? Seems like a miss from his speechwriter.

    Leave a comment:


  • frank ryan
    replied
    Criticizing Bibi or Israel isn't anti-Semitic. There is a lot to criticize.

    Leave a comment:


  • Maximus
    replied
    Originally posted by dabrockster View Post
    Since taking office there has been an increase in antisemitism and attacking of religious buildings and he has been silent on this and even goes as far as to use free speech to allow such actions.

    Just to add to his own antisemitic views he, he publicly says he is not attending the Israel Parade. Just another public statement to increase and give an open excuse to those with his same views of antisemitism.

    Mamdani slammed after revealing why he’s boycotting NYC’s Israel Day Parade



    https://nypost.com/2026/05/28/us-new...XEagClWK6LtNwB
    Which antisemitic views has he expressed ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Clark Addison
    replied
    I'm no Mandani fan but I don't find declining to attend an Israel Day parade troubling at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • dabrockster
    replied
    Since taking office there has been an increase in antisemitism and attacking of religious buildings and he has been silent on this and even goes as far as to use free speech to allow such actions.

    Just to add to his own antisemitic views he, he publicly says he is not attending the Israel Parade. Just another public statement to increase and give an open excuse to those with his same views of antisemitism.

    Mamdani slammed after revealing why he’s boycotting NYC’s Israel Day Parade

    The top cop, who is Jewish, pointed to herself during the briefing when a reporter asked if anyone would be representing the Mamdani administration at the parade.

    “It is the mayor’s decision not to march, and it is my decision to march proudly,” she said.

    But some members of the Jewish community weren’t convinced by Mamdani’s reason for ditching the event — pointing out it is a celebration of religious identity and comes at a time when antisemitism continues to roil the city.

    “It’s not a policy parade. It’s a Jewish people parade,” Rabbi Joseph Potasnik, executive director of the New York Board of Rabbis, told The Post.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    Yeah, that’s probably the least consequential of his crazy proposals. But the general point still stands.
    Perhaps not of any consequence at all!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post

    I don't have much of a comment on the rest of his proposals, but $40/hr on construction jobs is actually lower than the lowest prevailing wage rate in NYC on residential construction jobs, which is $42/hr. at its lowest, ranging up to $100/hr. on some jobs. So.... another nothingburger here.

    FYI, for comparison sake, Nevada prevailing wages in Clark County, Nevada - aka, the people's Communist Enclave of So. Nevada - is $88/hr.
    Yeah, that’s probably the least consequential of his crazy proposals. But the general point still stands.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    He certainly did not limit it to those scenarios, but legally that might end up being be his only option for confiscation.

    He is also adding a ton of new fees/costs to construction and then making it more difficult to sell. And requiring $40/hr minimum wage on all construction-related jobs. Add this on top of rent control, and I predict fewer people willing to take the financial risk of building in NYC. Everything he is doing is the exact opposite of what he should be doing and will make the problem (limited supply) worse, not better.
    I don't have much of a comment on the rest of his proposals, but $40/hr on construction jobs is actually lower than the lowest prevailing wage rate in NYC on residential construction jobs, which is $42/hr. at its lowest, ranging up to $100/hr. on some jobs. So.... another nothingburger here.

    FYI, for comparison sake, Nevada prevailing wages in Clark County, Nevada - aka, the people's Communist Enclave of So. Nevada - is $88/hr.

    Leave a comment:


  • dabrockster
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Confiscation of property is on the way.

    That is not communistic at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by LVAllen View Post

    They will, in fact, foreclose on unpaid tax liens and fines. Shocking, I know.
    He certainly did not limit it to those scenarios, but legally that might end up being be his only option for confiscation.

    He is also adding a ton of new fees/costs to construction and then making it more difficult to sell. And requiring $40/hr minimum wage on all construction-related jobs. Add this on top of rent control, and I predict fewer people willing to take the financial risk of building in NYC. Everything he is doing is the exact opposite of what he should be doing and will make the problem (limited supply) worse, not better.

    Leave a comment:


  • LVAllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Confiscation of property is on the way.

    They will, in fact, foreclose on unpaid tax liens and fines. Shocking, I know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Confiscation of property is on the way.

    Leave a comment:

Working...