Wormholes and Backward(s) Causation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wuapinmon
    Soul Plumber
    • Dec 2008
    • 30711

    #1

    Wormholes and Backward(s) Causation

    This is a link to a video wherein GOP Party Chair Michael Steele calls Afghanistan "a war of Obama's choosing" and then goes on to basically use the Princess Bride 'land war in Asia' theory to attack the "President's war." You have to listen carefully, but you can hear his incorrect assessment of our involvement in Afghanistan.

    [YOUTUBE]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MIRmkef2wZo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MIRmkef2wZo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]

    Surely the Republicans can find someone more qualified to lead than this inept man.
    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon
  • BigFatMeanie
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 7139

    #2
    Calls from within the party for his resignation, although occurring on and off over the past few years, have stepped up recently:

    Comment

    • statman
      Rabblerouser
      • Aug 2009
      • 2799

      #3
      Ummm... Obama claimed the war in Afghanistan as the only one that matters during the campaign. In his "Nobel Peace Prize" acceptance speech <snort!> The One invoked "just war" theory with regards to Afghanistan.

      Nice try, but Obama owns this bad boy...

      Comment

      • il Padrino Ute
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 19161

        #4
        Obama chose to keep the troops in Afghanistan. He also chose to keep the troops in Iraq. Both are wars of his choosing.
        "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


        "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

        Comment

        • old_gregg
          scaly man fish
          • Nov 2009
          • 16915

          #5
          Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
          Obama chose to keep the troops in Afghanistan. He also chose to keep the troops in Iraq. Both are wars of his choosing.
          As President Obama has said, the change we seek will take longer than one term or one presidency. Real change—big change—takes many years and requires each generation to embrace the obligations and opportunities that come with the title of Citizen.


          He has made that choice because it is the only pragmatic course in such a shitty situation. I understand Wolfowitz, et al., apologetics in some cases, but saying that Iraq/Afghanistan are results of B.O.'s policies is stupid.
          Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

          Comment

          • YOhio
            Hipster Mode
            • Nov 2008
            • 26165

            #6
            Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
            Surely the Republicans can find someone more qualified to lead than this inept man.
            Totally agree. His tenure as GOP chair has been one disaster after another.

            Comment

            • oxcoug
              Dolphins Rape Hipsters
              • Dec 2009
              • 5309

              #7
              Originally posted by statman View Post
              Ummm... Obama claimed the war in Afghanistan as the only one that matters during the campaign. In his "Nobel Peace Prize" acceptance speech <snort!> The One invoked "just war" theory with regards to Afghanistan.

              Nice try, but Obama owns this bad boy...

              Stat, Obama may own it - but that doesn't make it a war of his "choosing."

              Steele's entire angle of attack here - if he's even thought about it enough for us to call it that - is wrongheaded. Is he actually going to put forward a coherent Republican case for not being in Afghanistan?

              As previously suspected, Steele is out of his depth - race sensitivities (which, if we're going to be honest, we know got him this gig in the first place) have made it difficult to sack his sad ass but that won't protect him much longer.
              Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī

              It can't all be wedding cake.

              Comment

              Working...