Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can anything surprise God?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by byu71 View Post
    I would answer, yes he can. I mean if he repented of something, wouldn't that mean he didn't know what he did was going to be wrong? Otherwise you would have to believe God errors knowing full well he is erroring.
    When did God repent of something? Are you talking about when he repented of making man and decided to drown everyone except Noah? The JS translation changes that one a bit. But if you are serious, and suggesting that God repents, then to whom does he repent? And does that mean his errors are, like many or all of our (depending on definition) sins? A sinful God. Interesting.
    PLesa excuse the tpyos.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by beefytee View Post
      I don't think that God deals with time the way we do. So as far as my God goes, past, present, and future is kind of irrelevant.
      Then there can be no surprise to God. Moreover, there can be no free will. It is all pre-determined.
      PLesa excuse the tpyos.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by creekster View Post
        Could anything ever make him say "Didn't see THAT coming!" or is such a thing impossible?
        This must be inspired by that dumb joke Stephen Tobelowski told on the Toblowski files yesterday on NPR (he drew an analogy between a successful marriage and being patient as a dumb joke you have heard before is told to you).
        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

        --Jonathan Swift

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Moliere View Post
          I don't know if I can but I'll try. I assume that if God knows everything (past, present and future) or like someone later on said that his time is different than ours, that he could be stripped of emotion or at least emotions at a specific point of time. He would basically be in an eternal state of emotion based on the whole of everything that has happened and will happen. So if little Johnny pays his tithing, it doesn't make God happy because that act was already factored into God's eternal state of emotion. If little Johnny starts up his little factory, then it doesn't make God sad because that event was already factored into God's state of emotion, which is eternal and unchanging.

          If God doesn't know everything (but he still knows a lot) then his emotions can change or flux from one act to another similar to what a person experiences when something good or bad happens that was unexpected or at least not fully anticipated.

          Some may say that God could know everything and still have differing emotions, such as when a parent sees their child walk for the first time. Even though the parent knows the child will walk it's still a sight to behold for the first time and obviously causes emotion. I'd argue though that if God knows everything then he'd already have experienced the child walking and that would already be set in his current state of emotions.

          The Mormon God is one that changes emotions. Sometimes he weeps and sometimes He's happy, which is why I think the Mormon God is much less omniscient than we make him out to be. Granted I've thought about this much more than the average Mormon (or so I assume) but an emotional and omniscient God doesn't really work for me.
          This is an interesting question. To talk about it don't we first need to decide whether emotions are an artifact of our corporeal existence as opposed to embedded in our eternal souls? Does God really need to have emotions? Aren't emotions really a form of imperfection (if you get angry, or sad, etc., aren't you behaving in an imperfect manner?) If God knows all, past and future, how could he ever feel emotion about any event? We would all get exactly what we deserve and he would already know what was going to happen and what had happened and what choices we all make. Indeed, he knew it from before we existed. In fact, he created the conditions that caused it!

          Of course if God doesn't know everything, then he is imperfect and being emotional fits fine, but it also raises all sorts of other problems.
          PLesa excuse the tpyos.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by creekster View Post
            Then there can be no surprise to God. Moreover, there can be no free will. It is all pre-determined.
            If time is linear, you are correct.
            One of the grandest benefits of the enlightenment was the realization that our moral sense must be based on the welfare of living individuals, not on their immortal souls. Honest and passionate folks can strongly disagree regarding spiritual matters, so it's imperative that we not allow such considerations to infringe on the real happiness of real people.

            Woot

            I believe religion has much inherent good and has born many good fruits.
            SU

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by creekster View Post
              This is an interesting question. To talk about it don't we first need to decide whether emotions are an artifact of our corporeal existence as opposed to embedded in our eternal souls? Does God really need to have emotions? Aren't emotions really a form of imperfection (if you get angry, or sad, etc., aren't you behaving in an imperfect manner?) If God knows all, past and future, how could he ever feel emotion about any event? We would all get exactly what we deserve and he would already know what was going to happen and what had happened and what choices we all make. Indeed, he knew it from before we existed. In fact, he created the conditions that caused it!

              Of course if God doesn't know everything, then he is imperfect and being emotional fits fine, but it also raises all sorts of other problems.
              An eternal existence without emotions sounds extremely boring and dull for a God. But then again, an eternity of anything would get boring after an eon or so...
              "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
              "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
              - SeattleUte

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by snowcat View Post
                If time is linear, you are correct.
                It doesn't matter. In fact, linearity is irrelevant. The concept of linearity is meaningless if one assume knowledge of all, past, present and future. especially when you created all of the conditions affecting the events you are considering.
                PLesa excuse the tpyos.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by creekster View Post
                  Could anything ever make him say "Didn't see THAT coming!" or is such a thing impossible?
                  It is not possible because God does not exist.
                  That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                  http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                    It is not possible because God does not exist.
                    The Louis CK monologue on SNL was a brutal indictment of atheism. I assume with continued destruction like that atheism really is going to decline and become less socially relevant over the next decade.
                    Get confident, stupid
                    -landpoke

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                      The Louis CK monologue on SNL was a brutal indictment of atheism. I assume with continued destruction like that atheism really is going to decline and become less socially relevant over the next decade.
                      It's a PR nightmare for atheists.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                        It is not possible because God does not exist.
                        OK, that would surprise God!
                        "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
                        "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
                        "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          If God saw this coming and did nothing to stop it, he's a cold heartless bastard.

                          http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/wo...cident.html?hp
                          When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                          --Jonathan Swift

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                            If God saw this coming and did nothing to stop it, he's a cold heartless bastard.

                            http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/wo...cident.html?hp
                            It's not that he didn't want to do anything. Just that he was too busy helping LDS primary-aged children find their missing stuff.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                              If God saw this coming and did nothing to stop it, he's a cold heartless bastard.

                              http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/wo...cident.html?hp
                              I guess you never heard of the story of Noah and the Ark. If you are inclined to call him a chb, then you really have a basis from that story.

                              However, if you can't understand why these things happen, you might want to read Isaiah 55:8-9

                              By the way that is a real trajedy. Too bad you made light of it by attacking someone's belief in God.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                                If God saw this coming and did nothing to stop it, he's a cold heartless bastard.

                                http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/wo...cident.html?hp
                                You assume that God cares about whether we live or die. That would be a difficult thing to care about when you have an eternal view of everything. Also, God already saw it coming and maybe he didn't care because it was already factored into his eternal state of emotion.
                                "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X