Growing up in the U.C., I often heard people mention how important it was to "stand up for your beliefs."
The whole concept of standing up for your beliefs (the way Mormons use the phrase) is ridiculous. Just because you believe something doesn't mean that your beliefs are good or worth standing up for, even if you or your neighbors think certain beliefs seem good. Furthermore, beliefs based on fact generally don't require such an aggressive defense unless the audience is incapable of rational thought.
Free speech with dispassionate dialogue about facts while simultaneously questioning unsupported beliefs--now that's an approach I could buy. I would totally go to church if this is how Mormonism operated. I'm not saying that Mormon beliefs are all bad. I'm just saying that some are probably good, some are bad, and others are neutral--but most Mormon beliefs are unsupported by evidence. (I'd also like to point out that feelings do not qualify as evidence.)
I question the entire premise that it is good to believe in things, which are not seen, that are supposedly true based on a feeling in your heart. I thought Alma was awesome when I was in 2nd grade, but now I realize that Alma was so so wrong. Feelings are a very scary reason to believe in something.
The risk of my approach is that all the mythology would crumble. I say that's OK.
Lastly, lest I be accused of standing up for my beliefs, I'd say preemptively that I'm not standing up for beliefs. I'm standing up for fact-based, rational thought.
The whole concept of standing up for your beliefs (the way Mormons use the phrase) is ridiculous. Just because you believe something doesn't mean that your beliefs are good or worth standing up for, even if you or your neighbors think certain beliefs seem good. Furthermore, beliefs based on fact generally don't require such an aggressive defense unless the audience is incapable of rational thought.
Free speech with dispassionate dialogue about facts while simultaneously questioning unsupported beliefs--now that's an approach I could buy. I would totally go to church if this is how Mormonism operated. I'm not saying that Mormon beliefs are all bad. I'm just saying that some are probably good, some are bad, and others are neutral--but most Mormon beliefs are unsupported by evidence. (I'd also like to point out that feelings do not qualify as evidence.)
I question the entire premise that it is good to believe in things, which are not seen, that are supposedly true based on a feeling in your heart. I thought Alma was awesome when I was in 2nd grade, but now I realize that Alma was so so wrong. Feelings are a very scary reason to believe in something.
The risk of my approach is that all the mythology would crumble. I say that's OK.
Lastly, lest I be accused of standing up for my beliefs, I'd say preemptively that I'm not standing up for beliefs. I'm standing up for fact-based, rational thought.
Comment