New LDS Church Website: Mormons and Gays

[Joe Public]

Wow, I just realized I went to a Mormon bakery for prom dinner.

Did you get any Mormon muffins?

[Moliere]

From the article:



I guess if it didn't specifically contain those exemptions, then it seems like they can't use this bill to discriminate based on religious conviction. At least that's how I read it.

So the new law dodges other public accommodation (other than housing and employment) so that still all falls under the old existing statutes? I kind of wish the church would have gone further and given non-discrimination cover for all public accommodations, however this is a good first step.

I assume the LGBT crowd likes this bill because it is a step in their direction. When public opinion is trending in your favor it's better to get half of what you want since the other half will come soon enough.

[falafel]

Did you get any Mormon muffins?

Yeah, but they were inactive, so I'm not sure if that counts.

[RC Vikings]

Wedding cakes don't have a sexual orientation, so it's pretty much just propaganda.

Birthday cakes do

gallery003.jpg

[Northwestcoug]

So the new law dodges other public accommodation (other than housing and employment) so that still all falls under the old existing statutes? I kind of wish the church would have gone further and given non-discrimination cover for all public accommodations, however this is a good first step.

I assume the LGBT crowd likes this bill because it is a step in their direction. When public opinion is trending in your favor it's better to get half of what you want since the other half will come soon enough.

I'm really not sure. This morning I was reading it more charitably than yesterday, meaning that I thought that since they were not included in the statute, it will not be legal to claim religious convictions for discrimination.

We need some pro bono work from a lawyer here. Anyone?

[Copelius]

790 (2) This chapter shall not be construed to create a special or protected class for any
791 purpose other than housing.

182 (2) This chapter shall not be construed to create a special or protected class for any
183 purpose other than employment.

These lines seem to indicate that gay wedding cakes can still be discriminated against.

[Flystripper]

Birthday cakes do

[ATTACH=CONFIG]5592[/ATTACH]

I remain unconvinced. That could be a lesbian cake.

[Pelado]

Wedding cakes don't have a sexual orientation, so it's pretty much just propaganda.

Pretty sure our wedding cake was bi.

[Katy Lied]

il_340x270.137578964.jpg

[Commando]

Gorgeous wedding cake bobble-heads.

[old_gregg]

wonder how she got pink eye...

[UVACoug]

except for the bizarre bsa exemption

It's not bizarre ... it is required by the Supreme Court, who held they can't be required to hire gays.

[Northwestcoug]

http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/articl...nd-lgbt-rights

The devil is in the details:

Landlords owning fewer than four rental units may choose their tenants on the basis of the landlord’s personal preferences.

Small, family-oriented businesses (fewer than 15 employees) may hire based on religious and other values-based criteria.

So the 'LGBT people receive statewide protections from discrimination in employment and housing' bill that everyone is excited about provides specific guidelines on how to discriminate against LGBT people...

[Maximus]

http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/articl...nd-lgbt-rights

The devil is in the details:



So the 'LGBT people receive statewide protections from discrimination in employment and housing' bill that everyone is excited about provides specific guidelines on how to discriminate against LGBT people...

well except those are normal exceptions

http://labor-employment-law.lawyers....imination.html

http://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14007-...-the-workplace

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers with at least 15 employees, as well as employment agencies and unions, from discriminating in employment based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.

[Northwestcoug]

well except those are normal exceptions

http://labor-employment-law.lawyers....imination.html

http://ffrf.org/outreach/item/14007-...-the-workplace

So the bill the church supports is in line with exemptions in the Civil Rights Act. , I suppose.

But just how many landlords in Utah have 4 or fewer units? It has to be a significant proportion. So a lot of landlords can go ahead and discriminate against LGBT people just as they did before, and be in full 'compliance' with the law. Whatever.

The more I think of this, it seems hardly anything has changed. Religion already had protections from discrimination. All this hand-wringing about the loss of religious freedom, and the high-fiving about how much the church supports anti-discrimination laws, for what? The bill shores up the church's right to discriminate in its affairs and protects a lot of members to do the same in the private sector. And what exactly does the other side get, that isn't going to be the norm in the next generation?