In praise of "modern revelation"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HBCoug
    Peanut Gallery Asshat
    • Dec 2008
    • 2082

    #16
    Originally posted by Katy Lied View Post
    My parents engaged in mixed marital relations prior to 1978.

    In one state, my parents could not secure a rental contract on a house because of my father's race; the lease was signed only by my mother who was an acceptable race, even though her husband was the breadwinner. The Landlord was Chinese; damn those racist chinese, I am still pyschologically damaged lo these many years later. (Sorry Surfah) I spend hours online on the Asian chat boards complaining about this outrageous treatment. Of course things are different now, but the bitterness remains. It actually took a fair housing law to force change!

    In the city of Santa Ana, my father was once kicked out of a public swimming pool because he was mistakenly thought to be mexican. He informed the lifeguards that he wasnt, but it was a true case of skin color discrimination. The Lifeguards were californian; damn those racist californians, he is still pyschologically damaged lo these many years later. (Sorry Surfah) I spend hours online on the Californian chat boards complaining about this outrageous treatment. Of course things are different now, but the bitterness remains.
    Now there is a delicious bit of historical irony. Today in Santa Ana, my father could walk down Harbor Blvd from McFadden to Westminster Blvd and potentially not come across a non-Mexican the entire time. viva la raza!

    Comment

    • TripletDaddy
      sweet triple
      • Nov 2008
      • 58186

      #17
      Originally posted by HBCoug View Post
      Now there is a delicious bit of historical irony. Today in Santa Ana, my father could walk down Harbor Blvd from McFadden to Westminster Blvd and potentially not come across a non-Mexican the entire time. viva la raza!
      Speaking of delicious, there are several places to buy tamales year round in Santa Ana, right off Bristol. Around the holidays they bust out the cinnamon ones and the pineapple ones, too. yum!
      Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

      sigpic

      Comment

      • SeattleUte
        Faith crisis consultant
        • Nov 2008
        • 20837

        #18
        Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
        That was without a doubt the most mean-spirited (toward LDS) BOM musical review I have read yet. Ironic that this is the one that resonates with you.
        Do you have any problem with its logic?

        The play is damning enough it seems; no one has felt the need to pile on, I guess.
        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

        --Jonathan Swift

        Comment

        • HBCoug
          Peanut Gallery Asshat
          • Dec 2008
          • 2082

          #19
          Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
          Speaking of delicious, there are several places to buy tamales year round in Santa Ana, right off Bristol. Around the holidays they bust out the cinnamon ones and the pineapple ones, too. yum!
          Delicious indeed! I miss those street carts. I'm sure you can practically get the same thing on the streets of Highland.

          Comment

          • Jeff Lebowski
            Corporate lackey for Jesus
            • Nov 2008
            • 69601

            #20
            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
            Do you have any problem with its logic?

            The play is damning enough it seems; no one has felt the need to pile on, I guess.
            I think the review is a lazy, mean-spirited cheap shot.

            And gven your sensitivity to racism, I am puzzled why you aren't attacking tha manner in which Ugandans are depicted in the musical. You must be outraged.
            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

            Comment

            • woot
              Resident Science Cop
              • Nov 2008
              • 5531

              #21
              Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
              I think the review is a lazy, mean-spirited cheap shot.

              And gven your sensitivity to racism, I am puzzled why you aren't attacking tha manner in which Ugandans are depicted in the musical. You must be outraged.
              From what very little I've read about the Ugandans' treatment, and from a standpoint of one who has been only adjacent to Uganda but not in it, the treatment of the natives in the play seems to be extremely ignorant, and, dare I say, completely racist.

              But SU is nevertheless spot-on in his endless harping. I'm glad he does it, as it needs to be repeated until the church works out at long last what it wants to be. Either it is led by men with a tendency to present their opinions as if they were revelation, or by infallible men getting their orders from a very flaky god. You only get to pick one, but the church seems pick and choose depending on the situation.

              Comment

              • SeattleUte
                Faith crisis consultant
                • Nov 2008
                • 20837

                #22
                Originally posted by woot View Post
                From what very little I've read about the Ugandans' treatment, and from a standpoint of one who has been only adjacent to Uganda but not in it, the treatment of the natives in the play seems to be extremely ignorant, and, dare I say, completely racist.

                But SU is nevertheless spot-on in his endless harping. I'm glad he does it, as it needs to be repeated until the church works out at long last what it wants to be. Either it is led by men with a tendency to present their opinions as if they were revelation, or by infallible men getting their orders from a very flaky god. You only get to pick one, but the church seems pick and choose depending on the situation.
                The day they do the right thing they won't get to choose any longer. The aura of infalliblity will end. That's what's so hard for them. Do they want to maintain the old aura, or be respected?
                When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                --Jonathan Swift

                Comment

                • NorthwestUteFan
                  אלוף
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 3384

                  #23
                  Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                  The day they do the right thing they won't get to choose any longer. The aura of infalliblity will end. That's what's so hard for them. Do they want to maintain the old aura, or be respected?
                  When that happens, a large percentage of the 47% who actually pay tithing will then feel justified to say, "You know, I think that from now on I will define 'paying a full tithing' as 10% of what is left over after I pay my taxes, mortgage, and my kids' expenses..."

                  The church already can't afford that eventuality.

                  Comment

                  • Moliere
                    One man.....one pie
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 27844

                    #24
                    Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                    The day they do the right thing they won't get to choose any longer. The aura of infalliblity will end. That's what's so hard for them. Do they want to maintain the old aura, or be respected?
                    The aura of infallibility should have ended with Joseph Smith. RSR and NMKMH should be required reading for seminary students to give them a flavor of just how flawed church leaders can be.

                    I have no problem with you harping on this issue, but I take a lot of what is said on this issue from white men (from both sides) with a grain of salt. Ultimately I conclude that while the policy was racist, I'm not as smart as the God in which I believe and I have to believe there was some reason for the ban. That reason could be fallible leaders or it could indeed have been instituted by God, but honestly none of us know the answer and won't know the answer for a while.

                    I find it more interesting that God hated all people from the death of the early apostles until 1829. Didn't those people deserve the blessings that come from holding the PH? Apparently not since God withheld it from them.
                    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                    Comment

                    • Non Sequitur
                      Where did I put my bodkin
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 5773

                      #25
                      Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                      The day they do the right thing they won't get to choose any longer. The aura of infalliblity will end. That's what's so hard for them. Do they want to maintain the old aura, or be respected?
                      The issue isn't infallibility, it's prophets and revelation. Until the mentality shifts to a point where "prophet" is merely a title and "revelation" is more akin to "inspiration", it is impossible for the Church to say that a doctrine that affected so many people was a mistake. The shift will happen eventually.
                      "The mind is not a boomerang. If you throw it too far it will not come back." ~ Tom McGuane

                      Comment

                      • SeattleUte
                        Faith crisis consultant
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 20837

                        #26
                        Somebody should have bumped this thread during the recent Randy Bott discussions. What did they say about Randy Bott in conference?
                        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                        --Jonathan Swift

                        Comment

                        • DrumNFeather
                          Invisible Swordsman
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 8854

                          #27
                          Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                          Somebody should have bumped this thread during the recent Randy Bott discussions. What did they say about Randy Bott in conference?
                          Sister Beck thanked him by name for taking away much of the ire directed at her. It was actually a very tender moment.
                          "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

                          Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

                          Comment

                          • byu71
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 22070

                            #28
                            Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                            Somebody should have bumped this thread during the recent Randy Bott discussions. What did they say about Randy Bott in conference?
                            I must have missed that thread. Who is Randy Bott? They must have taught about him in Seminary on one of those days I skipped class. My guess he isn't a former or current GA and called Randy instead of Randall.

                            Comment

                            • TripletDaddy
                              sweet triple
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 58186

                              #29
                              Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                              Somebody should have bumped this thread during the recent Randy Bott discussions. What did they say about Randy Bott in conference?
                              During the morning session, Elder Scott addressed his comments to Jabari Parker, and while staring directly at him, Elder Scott apologized for anything Randy Bott may have said.
                              Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              • Flystripper
                                Degenerate Gambler
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 14089

                                #30
                                Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                                During the morning session, Elder Scott addressed his comments to Jabari Parker, and while staring directly at him, Elder Scott apologized for anything Randy Bott may have said.
                                and somehow Jabari felt guilty under Elder Scott's gaze.
                                Dyslexics are teople poo...

                                Comment

                                Working...