Inoculation is Overrated

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wuapinmon
    Soul Plumber
    • Dec 2008
    • 30711

    #46
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    I used to feel that way. Not anymore.
    So, how do you feel now....I don't know enough about you to guess.
    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

    Comment

    • Jeff Lebowski
      Corporate lackey for Jesus
      • Nov 2008
      • 69670

      #47
      Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
      I like and admire Sooner and Cardiac very much, as I've made clear. Their views are heresy to mainstream Mormonism. I'm not aware of any material difference between their views and mine, though they have married in the faith and elected to remain part of the community.
      I see lots of differences between their views and yours. And I am very happy to have both of them in the church.
      "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
      "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
      "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

      Comment

      • wuapinmon
        Soul Plumber
        • Dec 2008
        • 30711

        #48
        Originally posted by pelagius View Post
        (I am the world's worst heretic)
        The actual Pelagius is one of my heroes.
        "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
        The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

        Comment

        • pelagius
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 5288

          #49
          Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
          There is a guy in our ward who is on the stake high council. He sees it as his personal mission to keep us all on the straight and narrow. Whenever anyone deviates from the lesson manual he comes down like a ton of bricks. He gets red-faced and chews them out on the spot. Drives us nuts. Some of the instructors just chuckle and ignore him, but he does intimidate. He would have gone ballistic at AA's lesson on the first vision.
          That's funny ... well in a sad sort of way. My response in general is the following to these things (at least to reasonable people, unreasonable people I would just ignore usually). The only thing the lesson manual usually states as required is the following:

          "Prayerfully study the following scriptures and other materials:"

          Everything else is "suggested lesson development" and there is a lot of lattitude implied by "prayerfully studying" and where it can lead you. I read that line everytime and following the instructions and it just so happens that I never have time to get back to any of the other parts in the manual. But I follow the instruction in the manual to the letter.

          Comment

          • Jeff Lebowski
            Corporate lackey for Jesus
            • Nov 2008
            • 69670

            #50
            Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
            So, how do you feel now....I don't know enough about you to guess.
            I was afraid you would ask that. That requires a complex answer that I am not sure I have the time to tackle right now. For the time being, let me just say that there are lots of belief systems that I respect and admire.
            "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
            "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
            "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

            Comment

            • pelagius
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 5288

              #51
              Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
              The actual Pelagius is one of my heroes.
              Me too ... he was great.
              Last edited by pelagius; 02-02-2009, 10:46 AM.

              Comment

              • wuapinmon
                Soul Plumber
                • Dec 2008
                • 30711

                #52
                Originally posted by pelagius View Post
                Me too ... he was great.
                And not because of that Arthur movie.....I read about him extensively for my dissertation....it led me to believe that Augustine was a right son of a bitch.
                "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                Comment

                • SeattleUte
                  Faith crisis consultant
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 20837

                  #53
                  Pelagius (the dead one, not ours) couldn't hold Augustine's jock strap.
                  When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                  --Jonathan Swift

                  Comment

                  • pelagius
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 5288

                    #54
                    Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                    Pelagius (the dead one, not ours) couldn't hold Augustine's jock strap.
                    Ya but Jerome couldn't hold his.

                    Comment

                    • SeattleUte
                      Faith crisis consultant
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 20837

                      #55
                      I think as soon as a practicing Mormon inside the walls of a church building starts examining the warts and/or talking about hisoricity of anything in the B of M or the P of GP or D&C he loses his virtue in myriad ways. Here's how I'd teach it. I'd say these are the stories that meant so much to our forefathers and foremothers that they risked and even sacrificed all, sometimes even their wives or husbands and children, to uphold them. In this respect they have been guided and energized in the same way as peoples have for thousands of years. (I'm not sure what I'd say to a convert.) I'd call them stories and leave it at that. They'd be like parables, and I'd always try to contextualize them. It's that context that I think potentially redeems them and even gives them power.
                      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                      --Jonathan Swift

                      Comment

                      • pelagius
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 5288

                        #56
                        Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                        I think as soon as a practicing Mormon inside the walls of a church building starts examining the warts and/or talking about hisoricity of anything in the B of M or the P of GP or D&C he loses his virtue in myriad ways. Here's how I'd teach it. I'd say these are the stories that meant so much to our forefathers foremothers that they risked and even sacrificed all, sometimes even their wives or husbands and children, to uphold them. In this respect they have been guided and energized in the same way as peoples have for thousands of years. (I'm not sure what I'd say to a convert.) I'd call them stories and leave it at that. They'd be like parables, and I'd always try to contextualize them. It's that context that I think potentially redeems them and even gives them power.
                        I am going to regret asking this I think but given this how do you explain someone like me? I think I am towards the right tail of the distribution in terms of examining these issues but they haven't lost their virture for me (not to be presumptious but I think I would throw people like myboynoah, Creekster, AA, and many others in the same category as me).
                        Last edited by pelagius; 02-02-2009, 11:30 AM.

                        Comment

                        • Solon
                          Lost in the flood
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 5747

                          #57
                          Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                          And not because of that Arthur movie.....I read about him extensively for my dissertation....it led me to believe that Augustine was a right son of a bitch.
                          Fighting words.

                          It's on!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                          "More crazy people to Provo go than to any other town in the state."
                          -- Iron County Record. 23 August, 1912. (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lc...23/ed-1/seq-4/)

                          Comment

                          • All-American
                            Right, as Usual
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 15661

                            #58
                            Originally posted by pelagius View Post
                            I am going to regret asking this I think but given this how do you explain someone like me? I think I am towards the right tail of the distribution in terms of examining these issues but they haven't lost their virture for me (not to be presumptious but I think I would throw people like myboynoah, Creekster, AA, and many others in the same category as me).
                            He assumes that the true guardian of our virtue is not our faith, but rather our bad luck with the ladies.
                            τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                            Comment

                            • pelagius
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 5288

                              #59
                              Originally posted by All-American View Post
                              He assumes that the true guardian of our virtue is not our faith, but rather our bad luck with the ladies.
                              LOL

                              Comment

                              • SeattleUte
                                Faith crisis consultant
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 20837

                                #60
                                Originally posted by pelagius View Post
                                I am going to regret asking this I think but given this how do you explain someone like me? I think I am towards the right tail of the distribution in terms of examining these issues but they haven't lost their virture for me (not to be presumptious but I think I would throw people like myboynoah, Creekster and many others in the same category as me).
                                I think you are on thin ice morally.

                                I can only speak for myself. Here's what I find rewarding in studying "sacred" texts of whatever peoples. 1) the cultural and historical circumstances that led to and informed the writing of the text, empirically established; 2) their inherent artistic worth, 3) how they made or infludenced language, and 4) the civilizations or subsests of civilizations that grew out of and around them.

                                I find efforts to prove or disprove their "historicity" a fool's errand. Archeological Troy, the ruins of ancient Jerusalem and the Second Temple, etc., and the ancient Egyptial ruins, etc., are interesting because of 1) and they corroborate the broad, macro- historical background of the events dramatized. Beyond this, however, making a case for or attacking the supernatural elements or even the circumstances on a micro scale is a fool's errand except as entertaining fiction, if it's well done.

                                I'm not interested in environmental factors that may have caused the Nile to turn red at the time of the Exodus. I'm only passingly interested in the various iterations of the First Vision. More than anything else I find tormented explanations of the Book of Mormon's limited geography, etc. to be sad. I find Josephus' incongruos references to Christ using Christian verbiage in his histories to be a mildly curious mystery and no more. Given the chain of custody and what else Josephus' writings tell us about him, and what we know about the Gospels' advent, their souce is really not that mysterious. I woldn't have been surprised at what the "Book of Abraham" scrolls turned out to be, and wasn't when I learned about it relatively late in life (yes, reflects absense of innoculation, but I was long gone by then).
                                Last edited by SeattleUte; 02-02-2009, 11:45 AM.
                                When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                                --Jonathan Swift

                                Comment

                                Working...