If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Deep Structure: Why non-bigots oppose gay marriage
Yes, obviously, it could. I was just pointing out that not all governeing sovereigns agreeon the issue.
They're troublesome that way.
“There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
― W.H. Auden
"God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
-- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
"It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupery
The state law does not, of course, confer federal tax benfits on gay couples.
Nor federal tax penalties. And since most gay marriages are childless, I suppose more gays than not would be penalized with the higher tax rates that apply to married couples.
Here's the Calfornia domestic partnership law in all its glory (with some emphasis added:
At bottom, what we really are fighting about what we call the status: "marriage" or "domestic partner." For a discussion of what I think the real issue is, I like this blog post.
Domestic partners have the same rights under state law (except to call themselves "married"). They don't have the same rights under federal law.
If we disagree on something, it's because you're wrong.
"Somebody needs to kill my trial attorney." — Last words of George Harris, executed in Missouri on Sept. 13, 2000.
"Nothing is too good to be true, nothing is too good to last, nothing is too wonderful to happen." - Florence Scoville Shinn
Comment