Catcher in the Rye not aging so well

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SeattleUte
    Faith crisis consultant
    • Nov 2008
    • 20837

    #1

    Catcher in the Rye not aging so well

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/21/we...chuessler.html
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

    --Jonathan Swift
  • TripletDaddy
    sweet triple
    • Nov 2008
    • 58186

    #2
    So the kids don't relate to Holden because he is a wealthy anti-hero who uses dated words and phrases......but they relate to Harry Potter...an imaginary, broom-flying magician?

    Solid article.
    Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

    sigpic

    Comment

    • creekster
      It is NOT a monkey!
      • Nov 2008
      • 22661

      #3
      None of us are aging that well, you big phony.
      PLesa excuse the tpyos.

      Comment

      • SeattleUte
        Faith crisis consultant
        • Nov 2008
        • 20837

        #4
        Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
        So the kids don't relate to Holden because he is a wealthy anti-hero who uses dated words and phrases......but they relate to Harry Potter...an imaginary, broom-flying magician?

        Solid article.
        An imaginary, broom flying magician decked in tortois shell glasses and argyles attending a paranormal school for super elite Brits, the central character in a linear story line, who never knows true adversity, set back, tragedy or real confict.
        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

        --Jonathan Swift

        Comment

        • pelagius
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 5288

          #5
          Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
          An imaginary, broom flying magician decked in tortois shell glasses and argyles attending a paranormal school for super elite Brits, the central character in a linear story line, who never knows true adversity, set back, tragedy or real confict.
          Well he does give up ginny weasley at the end of book 6 to protect her ... I am mean that's pretty sad. Sure he gets her back but it seemed tragic at the time.

          Comment

          • beelzebabette
            Golf & Cubs Disrespecter
            • Nov 2008
            • 2907

            #6
            Originally posted by pelagius View Post
            Well he does give up ginny weasley at the end of book 6 to protect her ... I am mean that's pretty sad. Sure he gets her back but it seemed tragic at the time.
            Sheesh. A spoiler alert would be appreciated.

            Comment

            • pelagius
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2008
              • 5288

              #7
              Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
              Sheesh. A spoiler alert would be appreciated.
              Sorry ... I can spoil Breaking Dawn for you too if you want.

              Comment

              • beelzebabette
                Golf & Cubs Disrespecter
                • Nov 2008
                • 2907

                #8
                Originally posted by pelagius View Post
                Sorry ... I can spoil Breaking Dawn for you too if you want.
                Perfect. I'm almost as likely to read that as I am Harry Potter. Spoil away.

                Comment

                • pelagius
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 5288

                  #9
                  Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
                  Perfect. I'm almost as likely to read that as I am Harry Potter. Spoil away.
                  My writings on the subject are too extensive to list here but this will get you started:

                  Comment

                  • marsupial
                    Mississippi Queen
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 3678

                    #10
                    Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                    So the kids don't relate to Holden because he is a wealthy anti-hero who uses dated words and phrases......but they relate to Harry Potter...an imaginary, broom-flying magician?

                    Solid article.
                    Is "fuck" outdated? Who knew?
                    What's to explain? It's a bunch of people, most of whom you've never met, who are just as likely to be homicidal maniacs as they are to be normal everyday people, with whom you share the minutiae of your everyday life. It's totally normal, and everyone would understand.
                    -Teenage Dirtbag

                    Comment

                    • UtahDan
                      *
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 14496

                      #11
                      Originally posted by marsupial View Post
                      Is "fuck" outdated? Who knew?
                      If we could just get you to lose that avatar, you might become ideal woman around here.

                      Comment

                      • DrumNFeather
                        Invisible Swordsman
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 8854

                        #12
                        Kids these days want to be Edward Cullen, not Holden Caufield. It's just the way it is.
                        "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

                        Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

                        Comment

                        • I.J. Reilly
                          Nobody's Fool
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 2949

                          #13
                          Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                          If we could just get you to lose that avatar, you might become ideal woman around here.
                          Over your own wife I smell trouble

                          Comment

                          • beelzebabette
                            Golf & Cubs Disrespecter
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 2907

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DrumNFeather View Post
                            Kids these days want to be Edward Cullen, not Holden Caufield. It's just the way it is.
                            Backing up for a second here, I was just discussing with a friend in a grocery line over the weekend my complete disbelief of the whole Robert Pattinson thing. (He was on People's cover. Now love for Chace Crawford I can get on board with, but Robert Pattinson? I see nothing attractive there.

                            Comment

                            • Babs
                              Not a Lawyer
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 17128

                              #15
                              Originally posted by beelzebabette View Post
                              Backing up for a second here, I was just discussing with a friend in a grocery line over the weekend my complete disbelief of the whole Robert Pattinson thing. (He was on People's cover. Now love for Chace Crawford I can get on board with, but Robert Pattinson? I see nothing attractive there.
                              yeah, I'm with you. Of course I never got into the book, either.

                              Comment

                              Working...