Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Puerto Rico, the 51st state

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Puerto Rico, the 51st state

    For people who think MSNBC is purely liberal, I beg to differ. They just did a piece on Puerto Rico potentially becoming the 51st state, and their only guest was a guy from the Heritage Foundation (super conservative think tank). He went on and on about how the vote is rigged because Puerto Ricans who live in America will be able to vote on whether Puerto Rico should become a state. (I fail to see how this is unfair. We allow Americans who live elsewhere to vote in our presidential elections.) He also says it's a ploy by the democrats to get two more senate seats. That may be true, but no opposing viewpoint was provided.

    Why shouldn't PR be able to become a state if that's what the people want?
    That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

    http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

  • #2
    Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
    For people who think MSNBC is purely liberal, I beg to differ. They just did a piece on Puerto Rico potentially becoming the 51st state, and their only guest was a guy from the Heritage Foundation (super conservative think tank). He went on and on about how the vote is rigged because Puerto Ricans who live in America will be able to vote on whether Puerto Rico should become a state. He also says it's a ploy by the democrats to get two more senate seats. That may be true, but no opposing viewpoint was provided.

    Why shouldn't PR be able to become a state if that's what the people want?
    In my experience, the people of PR don't want it to become a state.
    Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

    Dig your own grave, and save!

    "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

    "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

    GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by falafel View Post
      In my experience, the people of PR don't want it to become a state.
      OK. I don't really know what they want. I'd be interested to see some polls.

      My how things have changed over the years. See quote from G.H.W. Bush State of the Union address:

      There’s another issue that I’ve decided to mention here tonight. I’ve long believed that the people of Puerto Rico should have the right to determine their own political future. Personally, I strongly favor statehood. But I urge the Congress to take the necessary steps to allow the people to decide in a referendum
      Last edited by SoonerCoug; 04-29-2010, 01:09 PM.
      That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

      http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

      Comment


      • #4
        The idea about PR becoming a state has been intermittently kicked around for at least 40 years. There's no reason to think it's any more possible now than in the past.
        Everything in life is an approximation.

        http://twitter.com/CougarStats

        Comment


        • #5
          Anyone else think that our current nice and neat number of states will be a barrier to adding any more?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by falafel View Post
            In my experience, the people of PR don't want it to become a state.
            Unless something has changed, this is my understanding as well. They like the in between status they currently enjoy.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm against it. I'm also against Guam or Samoa becoming states.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by woot View Post
                Anyone else think that our current nice and neat number of states will be a barrier to adding any more?
                I think it will have more to do with some artificial notion of tradition that people who failed american history will promote.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Apparently what congress is voting on today is different in many ways. It has some Republican support, and the wording on the ballot will be different. It's going to be interesting.
                  That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                  http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., whose parents were born in Puerto Rico and who represents part of Chicago, slammed the bill on the House floor Thursday morning, calling it a device to "impose" statehood on residents who have repeatedly rejected the idea.

                    "Really it's designed to get one thing and one thing only, and that is to have the people of Puerto Rico accept statehood for themselves," he said. "Why don't we accept their wishes? … It's spelled the same in English as in Spanish: N-O. No. No."
                    Funny
                    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm curious if the pro-state Puerto Ricans outnumber the pro-independence Puerto Ricans? As best as I can tell, the vast majority are fine with the status quo.
                      Everything in life is an approximation.

                      http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        From my undestanding the people of PR have voted 3 different times if they wanted to become a state and each time they said no. Last time was in 1998.

                        The question that was asked in the past gave 5 options:

                        Do you want:
                        Limited self-government free association
                        statehood
                        sovereignty
                        none of the above.

                        (FYI: None of the above won hands down each time)


                        What this new bill is proposing to do is change the wording and make it a two stage voting process:

                        The first part of the question:
                        "Do you want to maintain the status quo?"

                        Then if you chose "No" (Which many people think is a trick question considering the political and economical feelings across the country) they will give you only 3 options to chose from:

                        Statehood
                        full independence
                        modified commonwealth.


                        Seems like they have removed "None of the above Option". Except in the initial question, which many feel is a very tricky way to get the result you want (If you want them to chose Statehood)..


                        It seems very shady to me...
                        Last edited by dabrockster; 04-29-2010, 01:45 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                          OK. I don't really know what they want. I'd be interested to see some polls.

                          My how things have changed over the years. See quote from G.H.W. Bush State of the Union address:

                          There’s another issue that I’ve decided to mention here tonight. I’ve long believed that the people of Puerto Rico should have the right to determine their own political future. Personally, I strongly favor statehood. But I urge the Congress to take the necessary steps to allow the people to decide in a referendum
                          The people of PR were given that chance back then and said no (1998)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by dabrockster View Post
                            The people of PR were given that chance back then and said no (1998)
                            I missed that because the LDS Church exiled me to Siberia without access to news from 1997 until 1999. Coming home made me feel like I had been in a time capsule, and I still haven't learned about all the things I missed. For example, I haven't even seen Titanic yet.
                            That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens

                            http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by SoonerCoug View Post
                              For example, I haven't even seen Titanic yet.
                              Neither have I. I count it as a blessing, not a curse.
                              Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X