This offense is so uninspiring
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Happiness is Lubbock Texas in my rearview mirror - BYU v TT 2023
Collapse
X
-
https://www.si.com/college/byu/footb...ver-texas-tech
Everyone's favorite - highest graded players from the Texas Tech game! IMO, Robbins was ok, but Martin was way better. He averaged 9 ypc, but didn't get a touch in the 4th? Batty was all over the place, I would have rated him a bit higher.
1. Ethan Slade - 82.9
2. Crew Wakley - 81.1
3. Jakob Robinson - 81.0
4. Atunaisa Mahe - 76.8
5. Tyler Batty - 76.3
6. Jackson Cravens - 74.3
7. LJ Martin - 71.1
8. Aidan Robbins - 69.3
9. Kamden Garrett - 68.3
10. Darius Lassiter - 67.3"Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% how you react." - Charles Swindoll
- 2 likes
Comment
-
I do appreciate these updatesOriginally posted by byufan4ever View Posthttps://www.si.com/college/byu/footb...ver-texas-tech
Everyone's favorite - highest graded players from the Texas Tech game! IMO, Robbins was ok, but Martin was way better. He averaged 9 ypc, but didn't get a touch in the 4th? Batty was all over the place, I would have rated him a bit higher.
1. Ethan Slade - 82.9
2. Crew Wakley - 81.1
3. Jakob Robinson - 81.0
4. Atunaisa Mahe - 76.8
5. Tyler Batty - 76.3
6. Jackson Cravens - 74.3
7. LJ Martin - 71.1
8. Aidan Robbins - 69.3
9. Kamden Garrett - 68.3
10. Darius Lassiter - 67.3
Comment
-
Imagine if Crew Wakley hadn't dropped two interceptions.Originally posted by byufan4ever View Posthttps://www.si.com/college/byu/footb...ver-texas-tech
Everyone's favorite - highest graded players from the Texas Tech game! IMO, Robbins was ok, but Martin was way better. He averaged 9 ypc, but didn't get a touch in the 4th? Batty was all over the place, I would have rated him a bit higher.
1. Ethan Slade - 82.9
2. Crew Wakley - 81.1
3. Jakob Robinson - 81.0
4. Atunaisa Mahe - 76.8
5. Tyler Batty - 76.3
6. Jackson Cravens - 74.3
7. LJ Martin - 71.1
8. Aidan Robbins - 69.3
9. Kamden Garrett - 68.3
10. Darius Lassiter - 67.3"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Sorry for the ignorance, but what are these ratings based upon?Originally posted by byufan4ever View Posthttps://www.si.com/college/byu/footb...ver-texas-tech
Everyone's favorite - highest graded players from the Texas Tech game! IMO, Robbins was ok, but Martin was way better. He averaged 9 ypc, but didn't get a touch in the 4th? Batty was all over the place, I would have rated him a bit higher.
1. Ethan Slade - 82.9
2. Crew Wakley - 81.1
3. Jakob Robinson - 81.0
4. Atunaisa Mahe - 76.8
5. Tyler Batty - 76.3
6. Jackson Cravens - 74.3
7. LJ Martin - 71.1
8. Aidan Robbins - 69.3
9. Kamden Garrett - 68.3
10. Darius Lassiter - 67.3
Comment
-
https://www.pff.com/news/pff-fc-all-...itive%20grade.Originally posted by Applejack View Post
Sorry for the ignorance, but what are these ratings based upon?
Read the full details at the link above.
1. PLAY-BY-PLAY GRADING
PFF grades each event on a -2 to +2 scale with increments of 0.5, with 0 being the expected grade. For example, an unpressured pass to an open target that is completed earns a 0 grade, while a pass that breaks through a defensive line under pressure is above expectation and likely rewarded with a positive grade.
Unlike traditional data, PFF measures “performance relative to expectation” instead of just traits or measurable factors. The system looks at every play, creating a large sample size that eliminates bias and identifies undervalued players while avoiding player hype. The grading process evaluates players objectively, regardless of perceived ability.
PFF's grading process is built on a strict grading guide to turn subjective analysis into objective measurements. Graders must first demonstrate accuracy in the first two phases of data collection and undergo rigorous training on grading. Less than 10% of the data collection team become graders, including former performance analysts, current/former professional players, and individuals with demonstrated accuracy in data collection.
During a match, an average of 5-7 graders work on a specific facet simultaneously to allow for natural auditing. PFF also has several checks in place to ensure grading consistency and accuracy, such as major grade checks, flagging uncertain grades for senior graders, regular reviews, grading analysis, and a quality control team.
Overall, PFF's grading system is designed to create consistency and accuracy in subjective analysis through a rigorous process and checks to ensure high-quality data."Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% how you react." - Charles Swindoll
- 1 like
Comment

Comment