If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Fits with the belief that BYU has to be significantly better than Utah to beat them.
Not really ... possibly indirectly but it tends to ignore the following:
BYU in 2007 was a 4.5 point favorite. So only slightly better according to Vegas and they won. BYU was only a 5.5 point favorite in 2001 and they won. BYU fans think the 2001 team was quite good but Vegas never did (well certainly not much better than Utah). So 2 of 4 BYU wins in the 2000s came when they were less than a touchdown favorite according to Vegas and one victory came as underdog.
Also in the loses from 2002-2004 BYU was more than a touchdown underdog in each. So significantly worse than Utah according to the line. So 3 of 5 victories by Utah came when Utah was significantly better. The games that stand out as a bit anomalous are 2005 and 2006. BYU lost as a 10 point favorite in 2005 and won as a 10.5 point favorite by a small margin in 2006 (but they're not that unusual and we are talking about 2 out of 9 games). So overall precious little support for the hypothesis at least for the 2000s.
The last time I saw a line this crazy was TCU -20 over Utah.
"I don't know the origin of said bitch booming."-Art Vandelay
"Hot Lunch posted awhile back on this. He knows more than anyone except for maybe BO."-Seattle Ute
"I don't know the origin of said bitch booming."-Art Vandelay
"Hot Lunch posted awhile back on this. He knows more than anyone except for maybe BO."-Seattle Ute
Comment