Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MLB 2015

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • San Juan Sun
    replied
    That was a good game. Love playoff baseball, disappointing to see Cespedes end it like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    That's the series

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    Royals getting hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    Whoa. Huge error!

    Leave a comment:


  • lambdacoug
    replied
    Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
    Speaking of boring games, this one is dragging on...
    Well, baseball and boring are synonyms afterall.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    Speaking of boring games, this one is dragging on...

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
    What is the obsession tv announcers have on replay reviews of whether or not there was enough evidence to affect the outcome of the call? There just must be nothing else to talk about during those stoppage of plays, and of course for the next few minutes afterwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    Originally posted by San Juan Sun View Post
    Sometimes you have to manufacture controversy. Example: see falafel's posts above
    That deserves another.

    Leave a comment:


  • San Juan Sun
    replied
    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
    What is the obsession tv announcers have on replay reviews of whether or not there was enough evidence to affect the outcome of the call? There just must be nothing else to talk about during those stoppage of plays, and of course for the next few minutes afterwards.
    Sometimes you have to manufacture controversy. Example: see falafel's posts above

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    What is the obsession tv announcers have on replay reviews of whether or not there was enough evidence to affect the outcome of the call? There just must be nothing else to talk about during those stoppage of plays, and of course for the next few minutes afterwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by San Juan Sun View Post
    He didn't throw at Escobar. Believe me, if he wanted to hit Escobar he would have.

    He threw the ball up and very in, to where Escobar would possibly get hit IF Escobar aggressively dives over the plate to swing at a first pitch fastball. (By the way, that scenario is not a HBP, it's strike 1.)
    Okay.

    Leave a comment:


  • San Juan Sun
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post
    Syndergaard's explanation was bullshit. I don't care if you were "trying" to hit him, you intentionally threw the ball in the region of his head with the express purpose of "making him uncomfortable." In other words, if Escobar hadn't ducked, he would have caught a 98 mph fastball in the skull. Syndergaard can only say he wasn't trying to hit Escobar because he knew Escobar would try to avoid it. This is such a stupid practice that should not be countenanced. Even football, the most barbaric and violent sport we have, will kick you out of a game for targeting. There should be zero tolerance for someone throwing at a batter's head.
    He didn't throw at Escobar. Believe me, if he wanted to hit Escobar he would have.

    He threw the ball up and very in, to where Escobar would possibly get hit IF Escobar aggressively dives over the plate to swing at a first pitch fastball. (By the way, that scenario is not a HBP, it's strike 1.)

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by San Juan Sun View Post
    What's hard to understand? Escobar has been taking aggressive hacks over the plate, and Snydergaard wants to pitch him in a way that will change his approach, because Escobar has been lethal. Was it up and in? Yep. But they aren't playing beer league softball.

    This is the same reason you'll see up and in pitching during an obvious bunt situation.
    Syndergaard's explanation was bullshit. I don't care if you were "trying" to hit him, you intentionally threw the ball in the region of his head with the express purpose of "making him uncomfortable." In other words, if Escobar hadn't ducked, he would have caught a 98 mph fastball in the skull. Syndergaard can only say he wasn't trying to hit Escobar because he knew Escobar would try to avoid it. This is such a stupid practice that should not be countenanced. Even football, the most barbaric and violent sport we have, will kick you out of a game for targeting. There should be zero tolerance for someone throwing at a batter's head.

    Leave a comment:


  • San Juan Sun
    replied
    Originally posted by Noah Snydergaard
    "I mean, I certainly wasn't trying to hit the guy, that's for sure. I just didn't want him getting too comfortable. If they have a problem with me throwing inside, then they can meet me 60 feet, 6 inches away. I've got no problem with that."
    What's hard to understand? Escobar has been taking aggressive hacks over the plate, and Snydergaard wants to pitch him in a way that will change his approach, because Escobar has been lethal. Was it up and in? Yep. But they aren't playing beer league softball.

    This is the same reason you'll see up and in pitching during an obvious bunt situation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    Originally posted by lambdacoug View Post
    Total douche pitch... Seriously, throwing a baseball at a guy's head? Pretty fucking low. I'm all for some taunting and throwing the opposing side off kilter, but chucking a pitch at another man's head? Goes way over the line, IMO.

    I know. I know. I'm going to go pull the string now...
    It's the very definition of Bush League. These types of pitches are thrown by every team, usually to send a message or to retaliate for something. To be so brazen about it in the World Series is pretty lame. If that's the only way you can negate Escobar's hitting, you are Bush League. Mets deserve to be wiped out of the WS.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X