I loath the baseball players' union and the strike in 1994 and the threatened strike back around, I think, 2002 soured me on the game. I recall listening to the Jim Rome show back in 2002 and many fans were basically telling the union that if they had another strike then they were leaving permanently.
The 1999 NBA Lockout was lol funny "we make a lot but we also spend a lot." Since it was a lockout I didn't begrudge the players but I also thought the owners had just cause for the lockout. The owners knew that these idiots spent like drunken sailors and that they could get some major concessions.
During this NFL Lockout I find myself very much with the players on this point. NFL players make less than baseball and basketball players, they have shorter careers, and they damage their bodies more in the process. Many of its players are paid very well but there are a lot of guys that don't make a ton of money and they only have a small window when they can earn money as football players.
Roger Goodell is an asshole. His op-ed props up a straw man that the players are trying to tear down the agreement that's been in place which has proven to be enormously successful for the NFL and players. At the same time he fails to make any mention of the fact that it was the owners who started this (the word lockout doesn't appear in the entirety of the op-ed--he tries to paint the picture that the players are striking. The players were happy with a continuation of the current status quo. He also doesn't mention that the owners were trying to extract two more games out of the players. I love how he tries to act like he's concerned for the long term health of the players while at the same time increasing the number of games they play.
Couldn't the owners have gotten a rookie salary cap without too much of a fight? Wouldn't this have fixed a big part of the issue the owners have?
The 1999 NBA Lockout was lol funny "we make a lot but we also spend a lot." Since it was a lockout I didn't begrudge the players but I also thought the owners had just cause for the lockout. The owners knew that these idiots spent like drunken sailors and that they could get some major concessions.
During this NFL Lockout I find myself very much with the players on this point. NFL players make less than baseball and basketball players, they have shorter careers, and they damage their bodies more in the process. Many of its players are paid very well but there are a lot of guys that don't make a ton of money and they only have a small window when they can earn money as football players.
Roger Goodell is an asshole. His op-ed props up a straw man that the players are trying to tear down the agreement that's been in place which has proven to be enormously successful for the NFL and players. At the same time he fails to make any mention of the fact that it was the owners who started this (the word lockout doesn't appear in the entirety of the op-ed--he tries to paint the picture that the players are striking. The players were happy with a continuation of the current status quo. He also doesn't mention that the owners were trying to extract two more games out of the players. I love how he tries to act like he's concerned for the long term health of the players while at the same time increasing the number of games they play.
Couldn't the owners have gotten a rookie salary cap without too much of a fight? Wouldn't this have fixed a big part of the issue the owners have?
Comment