2016-2017 NCAA Hoops Thread

[Donuthole]

Utah really being punished for Coach Krazy's incredibly weak non-conference schedule (because he is a pussy).

They are a game ahead of USC and tied with Cal in PAC-12 but still nowhere in the bracket discussions while USC and Cal are in according to Lunardi. Good thing he canceled that road game against BYU. Dumbass.

While what you say is technically true, any schadenfreude is definitely premature at this point. Utah wins couple games in the P12 tourney, and they are squarely in the bubble discussion and probably in. They just destroyed Cal--who is supposedly in, according to Lunardi--on Thursday.

[Pelado]

I was just looking over the NIT bracket. Boise State made it in as a 6 seed and will be playing on ESPNU tomorrow at 8 pm MDT. How many of you will be cheering for the Broncos in that game?

[Applejack]

I was just looking over the NIT bracket. Boise State made it in as a 6 seed and will be playing on ESPNU tomorrow at 8 pm MDT. How many of you will be cheering for the Broncos in that game?

Not me. Broncos can suck it!

[DrumNFeather]

Are we doing the knockout pool this year?

[Donuthole]

Are we doing the knockout pool this year?

Yep. I was just thinking about that this morning during a super boring and needless deposition. I'll find the thread and post something shortly.

[creekster]

Yep. I was just thinking about that this morning during a super boring and needless deposition. I'll find the thread and post something shortly.

Needless? so it was pro bono work?

[Donuthole]

Needless? so it was pro bono work?

Depos have needs, too, bro.

This was the defendant's attorney deposing someone about some documents which were very self-explanatory and literally contained the answer to every question asked by the deposing party. So the deposing attorney probably feels great about generating some billable hours out of nothing, and thus may disagree with my classification of the depo. But I maintain that if the information known to all following a deposition is exactly the same as the information known prior to the deposition, and where the deponent has already signed an affidavit stating that all of the information he has about the incident is contained in the documents, the deposition was needless.

[RC Vikings]

I was just looking over the NIT bracket. Boise State made it in as a 6 seed and will be playing on ESPNU tomorrow at 8 pm MDT. How many of you will be cheering for the Broncos in that game?

I will

[BigPiney]

I will

As will I. I always cheer against the utes. Always. Even the Ducks get my support when playing the utes.

[Jeff Lebowski]

I was just looking over the NIT bracket. Boise State made it in as a 6 seed and will be playing on ESPNU tomorrow at 8 pm MDT. How many of you will be cheering for the Broncos in that game?

Dumb question, bro.

[Pelado]

Dumb question, bro.

Sorry. I find it interesting that of those who've responded so far, support in this game has been divided based on gender lines. I wasn't expecting that.

[Flystripper]

GO BRONCOS!

[BlueK]

GO BRONCOS!

Coach 80k makes it even easier to cheer against Utah.

[Bo Diddley]

Sorry. I find it interesting that of those who've responded so far, support in this game has been divided based on gender lines. I wasn't expecting that.

[falafel]

Depos have needs, too, bro.

This was the defendant's attorney deposing someone about some documents which were very self-explanatory and literally contained the answer to every question asked by the deposing party. So the deposing attorney probably feels great about generating some billable hours out of nothing, and thus may disagree with my classification of the depo. But I maintain that if the information known to all following a deposition is exactly the same as the information known prior to the deposition, and where the deponent has already signed an affidavit stating that all of the information he has about the incident is contained in the documents, the deposition was needless.

Authentication?