Originally posted by UtahDan
View Post
Bubble Watch 2012
Collapse
X
-
It's the last four at large bids and last four automatic qualifiers, thus called the First Four and not Play-In anymore even though it's the same thing.
-
-
Maybe informally, when there was just one play-in game (65 v. 64). When they started doing FOUR play-in games, they referred to them as Round One.Originally posted by UtahDan View PostAre they really not called play in games? I thought they were.
I think it's a bit of a bogus distinction, frankly, but you certainly can't say that a team seeded 12 or 14 didn't make it in the tournament when a team seeded 16 doesn't have to play a play-in game.τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν
Comment
-
-
That makes sense. The other cool thing is that you can be 14 seed and claim a tournament win without ever playing a higher seed. That is sort of a nice feather in your cap that a 9 or 10 seed can't get.Originally posted by All-American View PostMaybe informally, when there was just one play-in game (65 v. 64). When they started doing FOUR play-in games, they referred to them as Round One.
I think it's a bit of a bogus distinction, frankly, but you certainly can't say that a team seeded 12 or 14 didn't make it in the tournament when a team seeded 16 doesn't have to play a play-in game.
Comment
-
Play-in, first four, whatever. Beats the crap out of the NIT. I am happy."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostWow there is such a thing as East coast bias. Why would they want to punish the PAC like this?
Does the playin game constitute getting in? I think not.
Ask Washington and your deep tournament running UCLA if the play in game is in or not.
A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life. - Mohammad Ali
Comment
-
Just to carry this a bit further. Before last year, it may have made some sense to not count the play-in game as an official tournament game, since it was between two 16 seeds. However, as Surfah said, even then it counted as a tournament game. This is why, if you look up the tournament record of, say, Arkansas Pine Bluff, they show a win, since they beat Winthrop a couple of years back.Originally posted by Surfah View PostLike the first round? Opening round? First four?
Even before the first four format instituted last year, the loser of the play in game has always been credited with a tournament appearance.
Now, obviously, you have 12 seeds in the "First Four", or whatever they want to call it. It wouldn't make sense to have a loser of one of these games not "officially" make the tournament when you have 15 teams getting in as lower seeds than them.
Comment
-
In the tourney is in the tourney. This isn't the BCS. Utes jealousy is palpable today."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Call me conservative, but I'm really not a fan of what the round of 64 has become. 68 teams? The round of 32 is now referred to as the "Third Round"? Sure, four additional teams isn't that many more, and third round instead of round of 32 isn't that big of a deal, but week one of the NCAA tourney just isn't as familiar to me as it used to be and therefore I don't like it.Last edited by scottie; 03-11-2012, 07:02 PM.
Comment
-
I agree. Calling Thursday/Friday second round games is dumb.Originally posted by scottie View PostCall me conservative, but I'm really not a fan of what the round of 64 has become. 68 teams? The round of 32 is now referred to as the "Third Round"? Sure, four additional teams isn't that many more, and third round instead of round of 32 isn't that big of a deal, but week one of the NCAA tourney just isn't as familiar to me as it used to be and therefore I don't like it.Get confident, stupid
-landpoke
Comment
-
Jay Bilas has been screaming sarcastically: "60 TEAMS GET A BYE"Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View PostI agree. Calling Thursday/Friday second round games is dumb."They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.
Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.
Comment
-
Bilas is most likely upset that his precious Puke team didn't get a 1 seed.Originally posted by DrumNFeather View PostJay Bilas has been screaming sarcastically: "60 TEAMS GET A BYE""Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
Well, Pelado (and others I talked to on this post), I was wrong; you were right.Originally posted by Pelado View PostI'll look forward to seeing you around.
I'll admit, I can't believe the PAC reg season champ couldn't get in. Between what I was thinking and what you believed, something had to give. I'm here to eat my crow.
Good luck in the tourney, Cougs.
Comment
-
Comment