Bubble Watch 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • UtahJazzFan88
    Jazz | Utes | Raiders
    • Oct 2011
    • 1678

    #136
    Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
    Are they really not called play in games? I thought they were.
    It's the last four at large bids and last four automatic qualifiers, thus called the First Four and not Play-In anymore even though it's the same thing.

    Comment

    • HuskyFreeNorthwest
      Time to camp
      • Nov 2008
      • 26082

      #137
      Originally posted by UtahJazzFan88 View Post
      Would probably be crazy not to take Oregon at this point.
      You are right, I got a text from my glad-hander. Oregon is NIT bound, turns out my excitement can be contained.
      Get confident, stupid
      -landpoke

      Comment

      • All-American
        Right, as Usual
        • Nov 2008
        • 15657

        #138
        Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
        Are they really not called play in games? I thought they were.
        Maybe informally, when there was just one play-in game (65 v. 64). When they started doing FOUR play-in games, they referred to them as Round One.

        I think it's a bit of a bogus distinction, frankly, but you certainly can't say that a team seeded 12 or 14 didn't make it in the tournament when a team seeded 16 doesn't have to play a play-in game.
        τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

        Comment

        • UtahJazzFan88
          Jazz | Utes | Raiders
          • Oct 2011
          • 1678

          #139
          Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
          You are right, I got a text from my glad-hander. Oregon is NIT bound, turns out my excitement can be contained.
          9:00 PM EST tonight on ESPNU.

          Comment

          • UtahDan
            *
            • Nov 2008
            • 14496

            #140
            Originally posted by All-American View Post
            Maybe informally, when there was just one play-in game (65 v. 64). When they started doing FOUR play-in games, they referred to them as Round One.

            I think it's a bit of a bogus distinction, frankly, but you certainly can't say that a team seeded 12 or 14 didn't make it in the tournament when a team seeded 16 doesn't have to play a play-in game.
            That makes sense. The other cool thing is that you can be 14 seed and claim a tournament win without ever playing a higher seed. That is sort of a nice feather in your cap that a 9 or 10 seed can't get.

            Comment

            • Jeff Lebowski
              Corporate lackey for Jesus
              • Nov 2008
              • 69631

              #141
              Play-in, first four, whatever. Beats the crap out of the NIT. I am happy.
              "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
              "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
              "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

              Comment

              • CJF
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 8497

                #142
                Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                Wow there is such a thing as East coast bias. Why would they want to punish the PAC like this?

                Does the playin game constitute getting in? I think not.
                Ask Washington and your deep tournament running UCLA if the play in game is in or not.
                A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life. - Mohammad Ali

                Comment

                • Clark Addison
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 10302

                  #143
                  Originally posted by Surfah View Post
                  Like the first round? Opening round? First four?

                  Even before the first four format instituted last year, the loser of the play in game has always been credited with a tournament appearance.
                  Just to carry this a bit further. Before last year, it may have made some sense to not count the play-in game as an official tournament game, since it was between two 16 seeds. However, as Surfah said, even then it counted as a tournament game. This is why, if you look up the tournament record of, say, Arkansas Pine Bluff, they show a win, since they beat Winthrop a couple of years back.

                  Now, obviously, you have 12 seeds in the "First Four", or whatever they want to call it. It wouldn't make sense to have a loser of one of these games not "officially" make the tournament when you have 15 teams getting in as lower seeds than them.

                  Comment

                  • Moliere
                    One man.....one pie
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 27858

                    #144
                    In the tourney is in the tourney. This isn't the BCS. Utes jealousy is palpable today.
                    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                    Comment

                    • scottie
                      Junior Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 5247

                      #145
                      Call me conservative, but I'm really not a fan of what the round of 64 has become. 68 teams? The round of 32 is now referred to as the "Third Round"? Sure, four additional teams isn't that many more, and third round instead of round of 32 isn't that big of a deal, but week one of the NCAA tourney just isn't as familiar to me as it used to be and therefore I don't like it.
                      Last edited by scottie; 03-11-2012, 07:02 PM.

                      Comment

                      • HuskyFreeNorthwest
                        Time to camp
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 26082

                        #146
                        Originally posted by scottie View Post
                        Call me conservative, but I'm really not a fan of what the round of 64 has become. 68 teams? The round of 32 is now referred to as the "Third Round"? Sure, four additional teams isn't that many more, and third round instead of round of 32 isn't that big of a deal, but week one of the NCAA tourney just isn't as familiar to me as it used to be and therefore I don't like it.
                        I agree. Calling Thursday/Friday second round games is dumb.
                        Get confident, stupid
                        -landpoke

                        Comment

                        • DrumNFeather
                          Invisible Swordsman
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 8854

                          #147
                          Originally posted by HuskyFreeNorthwest View Post
                          I agree. Calling Thursday/Friday second round games is dumb.
                          Jay Bilas has been screaming sarcastically: "60 TEAMS GET A BYE"
                          "They're good. They've always been good" - David Shaw.

                          Well, because he thought it was good sport. Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

                          Comment

                          • il Padrino Ute
                            Junior Member
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 19161

                            #148
                            Originally posted by DrumNFeather View Post
                            Jay Bilas has been screaming sarcastically: "60 TEAMS GET A BYE"
                            Bilas is most likely upset that his precious Puke team didn't get a 1 seed.
                            "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                            "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                            Comment

                            • FountainofUte
                              Junior Member
                              • Mar 2012
                              • 54

                              #149
                              Originally posted by Pelado View Post
                              I'll look forward to seeing you around.
                              Well, Pelado (and others I talked to on this post), I was wrong; you were right.

                              I'll admit, I can't believe the PAC reg season champ couldn't get in. Between what I was thinking and what you believed, something had to give. I'm here to eat my crow.

                              Good luck in the tourney, Cougs.

                              Comment

                              • TripletDaddy
                                sweet triple
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 58186

                                #150
                                FountainofUte is an awesome addition to CUF.
                                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...