Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Henry Gates, Abraham Lincoln and Joseph Smith

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Henry Gates, Abraham Lincoln and Joseph Smith

    I was listening to C-Span on Xm radio tonight and their "American Perspectives" series replayed discussion with Henry Gates just before his arrest where he talks about race, slavery and Lincoln. The link to the audio is here.

    If you think you know what this guy is all about, you don't until you have listened to this. He is full of interesting facts and has a very balanced approach to the topic and seems to particularly relish demythologizing what people believe about historical heros, and not just Lincoln, but he also talks about misconceptions blacks have about their own heritage. From the fact that the slave trade originates in Africa with blacks waging war on other black to capture them to sell to whites, to the fact that most free black in the antebellum south themselves owned slaves (and NOT just their own family), to the fact that a group of slave owning blacks in North Carolina formed a regiment and fought on the side of the Confederates (all around and after 1:26). He makes a statement to the effect that blacks are just as despicable as any other people and given the opportunity will oppress to the same extend whites have.

    But to me his most interesting comments (starting around 1:18) are to the effect that each generation reconstructs Lincoln in its own image and always sees Lincoln reflected back when it looks in the mirror. Castro and Reagan both named Lincoln has their hero, for example. He also states that in his opinion Lincoln is greater not as a myth but as a man who is "better for being a little bad." The idea that his true greatness results in part from his flaws and that it is better to view the whole, if flawed, man and that it gives him short shrift to simply paint him as a sort of "American Jesus." I couldn't help but think as I listened to that that he had almost exactly captured my thoughts about a contemporary of Lincolns, who was also martyred, but as a much younger man: Joseph Smith.

    Folks may also find it interesting around 22:00 where he talks about the genealogical work he has done Provo and how the "Mormons gave me my family back." He readily acknowledges that the world authority on genealogy is the church.

    Anyway, I don't know what happened in his house but this is not some guy on a crusade looking to become an object lesson. He is clearly brilliant and this is well worth investing some time in listening to. Enjoy.
    Last edited by UtahDan; 08-09-2009, 12:35 AM.

  • #2
    Every good historian tries to make history a study of things that really were, but history is unavoidable a study of ourselves. We can never read the records of the past without placing ourselves on the stage of history or placing its actors in our contemporary age. I may have thought of history once as a unidirectional flow of information. I've come to realize since then that it is altogether reciprocal.
    τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

    Comment


    • #3
      FAIL

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
        FAIL
        You fail. Jerk.
        τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by All-American View Post
          You fail. Jerk.
          I know, that's what I said!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
            I know, that's what I said!
            By failing to specify the subject of the verb "fail," you left an ambiguous statement which could have easily been interpreted as saying my own submission had failed. Such imprecision should be avoided in the future.
            τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by All-American View Post
              By failing to specify the subject of the verb "fail," you left an ambiguous statement which could have easily been interpreted as saying my own submission had failed. Such imprecision should be avoided in the future.
              You are just a sensitive Sally who already suspects in his heart that he is a failure and goes around projecting the expectation that the rest of us feel the same way about him. You better thicken that skin up in the next 30 days my friend! Socratic method is not for the faint of heart!

              Comment


              • #8
                Are you guys really fighting, or are you just kidding around?
                “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                ― W.H. Auden


                "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                  Are you guys really fighting, or are you just kidding around?
                  Kidding around, since no one wants to talk about my uber interesting post.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This is indeed interesting, UD, and increases my respect for Gates. I must say, however, that as a Lincolnophile the more I read about the man, the more I feel he truly deserves to be called "great." Yes, everyone seems to want to adopt him as their hero (in Castro's case I think he was cynical in doing so). But if ever it was true that the man and the moment met, it is true for A. Lincoln.

                    I'm starting another Lincoln book today, Lincoln: President-Elect, by Harold Holzer. It's about how Lincoln handled "the great secession winter" between his election and inauguration, when the Union was falling apart, Lincoln had no power to do anything, and Buchanan wouldn't do anything. Looks very interesting!
                    “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                    ― W.H. Auden


                    "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                    -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                    "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                    --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      One of the things Gates argues about Lincoln is that a huge part of his greatness comes from the fact that he overcame his racism to a large degree. He talks on the audio I linked about Lincoln's first meeting with Frederick Douglas and how profoundly it impacted both Lincoln and Doulgases views, particularly Lincolns view of the "negro." He talks about how Lincoln literally gave his life for civil rights and relates how in his last address Lincoln suggested that congress allow the 200K or so blacks who fought for the union to be given the right to vote. In the audience that day was Booth and it was the last straw for him.

                      So I hope I didn't give the wrong impression that Gates in any way denies the greatness of Lincoln, rather, he finds it in his complexity and imperfections and most of all his ability change and grow in his views. His argument is that when we gloss over his early racism and some of the other less glowing parts, we fail to get the big picture which shows him to be even greater than if we simply viewed him is some messiah who arrived fully formed.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by UtahDan View Post
                        One of the things Gates argues about Lincoln is that a huge part of his greatness comes from the fact that he overcame his racism to a large degree. He talks on the audio I linked about Lincoln's first meeting with Frederick Douglas and how profoundly it impacted both Lincoln and Doulgases views, particularly Lincolns view of the "negro." He talks about how Lincoln literally gave his life for civil rights and relates how in his last address Lincoln suggested that congress allow the 200K or so blacks who fought for the union to be given the right to vote. In the audience that day was Booth and it was the last straw for him.

                        So I hope I didn't give the wrong impression that Gates in any way denies the greatness of Lincoln, rather, he finds it in his complexity and imperfections and most of all his ability change and grow in his views. His argument is that when we gloss over his early racism and some of the other less glowing parts, we fail to get the big picture which shows him to be even greater than if we simply viewed him is some messiah who arrived fully formed.
                        I agree. My own appreciation of Lincoln has grown as I have learned more about the evolution of his views on slavery. When I read "Founding Brothers" by Ellis I was struck by his comment that at the Founding there was not a multi-racial society anywhere on Earth, and that the views of the Founders needed to be seen in that light. By the time Lincoln came along there might have been a multi-racial society somewhere, but it had to be very new. For a politician to evolve the way Lincoln did, on an explosive racial issue, was truly remarkable.
                        “There is a great deal of difference in believing something still, and believing it again.”
                        ― W.H. Auden


                        "God made the angels to show His splendour - as He made animals for innocence and plants for their simplicity. But men and women He made to serve Him wittily, in the tangle of their minds."
                        -- Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons


                        "It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye."
                        --Antoine de Saint-Exupery

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This thread is a first.

                          I have heard of "pity votes." I have heard of "pity laughs." I have even heard of "pity sex." I have never heard of "pity historical exegesis."

                          LA Ute is a kind soul.
                          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by LA Ute View Post
                            I agree. My own appreciation of Lincoln has grown as I have learned more about the evolution of his views on slavery. When I read "Founding Brothers" by Ellis I was struck by his comment that at the Founding there was not a multi-racial society anywhere on Earth, and that the views of the Founders needed to be seen in that light. By the time Lincoln came along there might have been a multi-racial society somewhere, but it had to be very new. For a politician to evolve the way Lincoln did, on an explosive racial issue, was truly remarkable.
                            Makes you wonder why nobody's made a good Lincoln movie.

                            Actually, no, it tells you exactly why nobody's made a good Lincoln movie. There's too much of myth and history intertwined with one another to please anybody.
                            τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
                              This thread is a first.

                              I have heard of "pity votes." I have heard of "pity laughs." I have even heard of "pity sex." I have never heard of "pity historical exegesis."

                              LA Ute is a kind soul.
                              Its true. This subject matter just doesn't elicit the kind of enthusiasm that other topics do such as google searches , best looking journal or the new Nike skateboard line.

                              If you really want to get people talking you have to plumb the intellectual depth with things like the Dodgers, Tonight Show or Cafe Rio.

                              I just don't have the gift of being interesting.

                              EDIT: I still don't know why Crab Chips didn't take off.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X