Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saudi journalist chopped to bits

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moliere
    replied
    Give us about three more years to complete some of the pipelines coming out of the Permian and we’ll have enough production and takeaway capacity to give the Saudi’s the finger.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaloAltoCougar
    replied
    Originally posted by Commando View Post
    I notice you didn't say 'ironic.' Is that because people are such a-holes here?
    lol. I typed "ironic" first, but decided it wasn't worth the trouble. So I replaced it with "interesting" despite the word "interest" appearing clunkily four words later. Sad!

    With the recent (welcome) appearances of various board emeriti from extinct fora like UFN, CG, etc., 'Napper and I were commiserating this very afternoon on our loss of mojo from nearly two decades ago. Now please adjust my shawl and look away...

    Leave a comment:


  • Commando
    replied
    Originally posted by PaloAltoCougar View Post
    It's interesting that in the interest of preserving billions in arms sales, the U.S. may not aggressively pursue justice for Khashoggi whose uncle was one of the world's biggest gun runners and arms dealers.
    I notice you didn't say 'ironic.' Is that because people are such a-holes here?

    Leave a comment:


  • PaloAltoCougar
    replied
    It's interesting that in the interest of preserving billions in arms sales, the U.S. may not aggressively pursue justice for Khashoggi whose uncle was one of the world's biggest gun runners and arms dealers.

    Leave a comment:


  • frank ryan
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueK View Post
    Somewhat predictably Trump seems to be trying to run interference for the Saudis. After Trump in his 60 Minutes interview threw out the idea that maybe it was "rogue operatives" at fault, the Saudis seem to be officially running with that explanation. How much does the Trump Organization stand to lose in business if relations with Saudi Arabia turn bad or if there are sanctions? That's probably all you need to know about Trump's reaction.

    A ton, but those on one side of the course political spectrum have zero interest in his businesses impacting policies.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
    This is true but our domestic oil capacity should give us more freedom to at least be offended for accidently going mid-evil on a journalist during "routine" interrogation.
    I'll bet they are secretly very upset.

    Leave a comment:


  • Goatnapper'96
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post
    Yeah, but S.A. has been our bro forever, despite all the terrorism being exported from there. Trump's actions are just status quo.
    This is true but our domestic oil capacity should give us more freedom to at least be offended for accidently going mid-evil on a journalist during "routine" interrogation.

    Leave a comment:


  • frank ryan
    replied
    Originally posted by Commando View Post
    Well shit- most of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis but yet Saudi Arabia is conspicuously absent from the countries affected by the Muslim ban. Most of the countries on that list have almost zero connection to terrorism and present no threat outside the perceived threat of being Muslim. I'm sure it has nothing to do with $$$ though.
    Did you ever read the declassified Saudi pieces of the 9/11 report? Their intelligence agents and vips had a hand in funding the hijackers and stuff. Some factions were definitively not friendly, but they are strategically very important.
    Last edited by frank ryan; 10-16-2018, 02:39 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Commando View Post
    Well shit- most of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis but yet Saudi Arabia is conspicuously absent from the countries affected by the Muslim ban. Most of the countries on that list have almost zero connection to terrorism and present no threat outside the perceived threat of being Muslim. I'm sure it has nothing to do with $$$ though.
    Yeah, but S.A. has been our bro forever, despite all the terrorism being exported from there. Trump's actions are just status quo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Ted
    replied
    Originally posted by Commando View Post
    Well shit- most of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis but yet Saudi Arabia is conspicuously absent from the countries affected by the Muslim ban. Most of the countries on that list have almost zero connection to terrorism and present no threat outside the perceived threat of being Muslim. I'm sure it has nothing to do with $$$ though.
    We should invade Saudi Arabia so we can sell them some more weapons to defend themselves with.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Ted
    replied
    Originally posted by frank ryan View Post
    Anyone have any thoughts on this piece of news?
    It was just maybe a mistake...

    Saudis May Admit Khashoggi Was Killed in Interrogation by Mistake

    When you are interrogating with a bone saw sometimes you may slip and accidentally cut someone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Commando
    replied
    Originally posted by BlueK View Post
    Somewhat predictably Trump seems to be trying to run interference for the Saudis. After Trump in his 60 Minutes interview threw out the idea that maybe it was "rogue operatives" at fault, the Saudis seem to be officially running with that explanation. How much does the Trump Organization stand to lose in business if relations with Saudi Arabia turn bad or if there are sanctions? That's probably all you need to know about Trump's reaction.
    Well shit- most of the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis but yet Saudi Arabia is conspicuously absent from the countries affected by the Muslim ban. Most of the countries on that list have almost zero connection to terrorism and present no threat outside the perceived threat of being Muslim. I'm sure it has nothing to do with $$$ though.

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueK
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post
    Worked for WaPo, right?
    Yes

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Worked for WaPo, right?

    Leave a comment:


  • BlueK
    replied
    Somewhat predictably Trump seems to be trying to run interference for the Saudis. After Trump in his 60 Minutes interview threw out the idea that maybe it was "rogue operatives" at fault, the Saudis seem to be officially running with that explanation. How much does the Trump Organization stand to lose in business if relations with Saudi Arabia turn bad or if there are sanctions? That's probably all you need to know about Trump's reaction.
    Last edited by BlueK; 10-16-2018, 01:47 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X