I've been searching for information on this, and the following link to the Washington Post at least clarifies my issue as simply as possible: https://www.washingtonpost.com/reale...=.5246c592784c
I've owned my current home since 1989 - 28 years. However, I moved to another town due to job changes from mid-2011 to mid-2016 - five years in total. Next June I will have been back in my longtime home for two years. But there is a good chance that the proposed tax bill will change the rules on me before I can sell my home, so I'll owe an extra $100K or so in taxes because of it. I'm not going to stay for five years to meet the new rules - at which point they could have changed it again anyway.
I've been an independent for many years now, believing that neither party really represents me very well. It's almost enough to push me into joining the Democrats.
/End of Rant :rant:
Under the Republican proposal, the two-out-of-five standard would vanish. Instead, you’d need to live in and use the property as your main residence for five of the preceding eight years — a requirement designed to lower the number of people eligible to claim the exclusion. This would inevitably hurt middle-income and other families who were forced to sell their houses because of job transfers or medical reasons, as well as first-time buyers moving up to a new home a few years after purchase as their families expand. The bill also would limit use of the tax-free exclusion to once every five years, up from the current two years.
I've been an independent for many years now, believing that neither party really represents me very well. It's almost enough to push me into joining the Democrats.
/End of Rant :rant:
Comment