Roy Moore: Pedophile Pig

[frank ryan]

Write in Ron Bishop!

Doug Jones seems like a good guy.


Here's some other investing stuff on Moore:

Textbook co-authored by Roy Moore in 2011 says women shouldn’t run for office
The course is also critical of the women's suffrage movement.

Alabama Republican Senate Candidate Roy Moore co-authored a study course, published in 2011 and recently obtained by ThinkProgress, that instructs students that women should not be permitted to run for elected office. If women do run for office, the course argues, people have a moral obligation not to vote for them. The course is also critical of the women’s suffrage movement, which in 1920 secured some American women the right to vote.

The course, called “Law and Government: An Introductory Study Course,” includes 28 hours of audio and visual lectures given by Moore and others, as well as a study guide. The course is available for purchase on Amazon, where “Chief Justice Roy Moore” is listed as a co-author alongside Doug Phillips, Dr. Joseph C. Morecraft, and Dr. Paul Jehle.

https://thinkprogress.org/moore-study-course-vison-forum-135402ed8816/

[Uncle Ted]

Looks like Moore is ahead in the polls again. Stay classy Alabama GOP!


http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/201...oy_moor_1.html

Write in Ron Bishop!

[frank ryan]

Looks like Moore is ahead in the polls again. Stay classy Alabama GOP!


http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/201...oy_moor_1.html

[BlueK]

I need to remind myself not to read comments on those articles.

it might be fun to respond and call them by their real names of Igor, Sergei, Vladimir, etc. That usually gets them excited and causes their grammar to go out of whack. Then you can make fun of that too.

[frank ryan]

Ben Shapiro rips O'Keefe.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/24015/...al-ben-shapiro

I need to remind myself not to read comments on those articles.

[frank ryan]

Ben Shapiro rips O'Keefe.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/24015/...al-ben-shapiro

That’s good to see. I’ve noticed Shapiro hasn’t been afraid to break ranks when he feels it’s right. Sean Hannity he is not.

It's worth noting Trump and Bannon have supported O'Keefe, financially and otherwise.

[Jeff Lebowski]

O'Keefe has never done anything that remotely resembles real journalism. He's dishonest. He's not equally as credible as the msm. Even the initial report about the ACORN stuff that landed him on the map (and caused the destruction of an organization that did some good in underserved communities) was fraudulent. I find it appalling his group is considered a charity. Conservatives should distance themselves from this guy. He's scum.

Ben Shapiro rips O'Keefe.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/24015/james-okeefe-tried-sting-wapo-fake-moore-sexual-ben-shapiro

[frank ryan]

Peripherally related to the Moore campaign. A woman contacts the Post with a story that Moore impregnated her and drove her to Mississippi to have an abortion. The Post reporters try to verify her story and find inconsistencies. They dig up a gofundme page of hers asking for donations to help her move to NY, to start a job to "work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt of the liberal MSM." They confront her with this and the other inconsistencies of her story, and she declines to go forward with her story:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html?utm_term=.be124b39be36

Then it gets interesting. They stake out Project Veritas in New York, the organization that James O'Keefe runs. The reporters then see her car pull up to the office and stay there for an hour. Reporters then confront O'Keefe on the street and ask him about the woman, and visibly flustered he refuses to talk about her. Delicious, sweet irony.

I saw someone on Twitter make the comment along the lines of "so the way to combat fake news is with....fake news". Pardon me if I'm even more incredulous about his gotcha journalism with Planned Parenthood, and any other hit piece he's involved with.

O'Keefe has never done anything that remotely resembles real journalism. He's dishonest. He's not equally as credible as the msm. Even the initial report about the ACORN stuff that landed him on the map (and caused the destruction of an organization that did some good in underserved communities) was fraudulent. I find it appalling his group is considered a charity. Conservatives should distance themselves from this guy. He's scum.

[Northwestcoug]

Peripherally related to the Moore campaign. A woman contacts the Post with a story that Moore impregnated her and drove her to Mississippi to have an abortion. The Post reporters try to verify her story and find inconsistencies. They dig up a gofundme page of hers asking for donations to help her move to NY, to start a job to "work in the conservative media movement to combat the lies and deceipt of the liberal MSM." They confront her with this and the other inconsistencies of her story, and she declines to go forward with her story:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/a-woman-approached-the-post-with-dramatic--and-false--tale-about-roy-moore-sje-appears-to-be-part-of-undercover-sting-operation/2017/11/27/0c2e335a-cfb6-11e7-9d3a-bcbe2af58c3a_story.html?utm_term=.be124b39be36

Then it gets interesting. They stake out Project Veritas in New York, the organization that James O'Keefe runs. The reporters then see her car pull up to the office and stay there for an hour. Reporters then confront O'Keefe on the street and ask him about the woman, and visibly flustered he refuses to talk about her. Delicious, sweet irony.

I saw someone on Twitter make the comment along the lines of "so the way to combat fake news is with....fake news". Pardon me if I'm even more incredulous about his gotcha journalism with Planned Parenthood, and any other hit piece he's involved with.

[Color Me Badd Fan]

Heh

Please tell me his campaign actually produced this poster.

Also another one I've heard online "Roy Moore -- Thrown Out of Three Courts, Including the Food Court."

[Jeff Lebowski]

Heh

[cowboy]

And this is the ultimate argument against anything to do with Trump. Mother was always right. Whether directly, or indirectly, you are who you associate with.

Yep. The problem with the last election was there was no good candidate. Trump wasn't even the Republicans' choice. He had far less than a majority of the primary votes, but the crowded field allowed him to slip in. I think Hillary is equally despicable, albeit in different ways, so I didn't vote for either. Had I been forced, I probably would have voted for Trump because I think Hillary would have done lasting damage to the economy, but I also didn't think he would have such poor judgement to incite a psychotic dictator who controls a nuclear arsenal.

Looking back, I don't think that would have been the right choice, but it's still hard to know because we don't know how Hillary would have governed. She would have had equally thin skin, and been equally if not more vindictive, but sneakier about it. Her political IQ is exponentially higher than Trump's, so that may have muted some of her decisions as she tried to do just enough to keep the majority of the country happy. I'd like to see our primaries select the top two candidates and then have a run-off between them for the nomination. If that had happened, we'd likely have ended up with Kasich as the president, which would have been the best possible outcome, imo.

I read NR from time to time when I want an informed conservative perspective. It’s a respectable outlet. I’m not shocked they’d have that opinion.

I don't read it often, but I follow it on twitter. I look at it as a conservative op-ed source, and read it from that perspective. It's similar to the WSJ op-ed section, except the WSJ will have editorials from liberals from time to time.

[Jeff Lebowski]

Great article. Yeah, NRO has been a respectable voice of reason during the Trump debacle.

[frank ryan]

Excellent article in the National Review, of all places, about why voting for people like Moore just for SCOTUS nominations is counter-productive. Here are the last three paragraphs, which sum the argument up pretty well:

I read NR from time to time when I want an informed conservative perspective. It’s a respectable outlet. I’m not shocked they’d have that opinion.

[Jarid in Cedar]

Excellent article in the National Review, of all places, about why voting for people like Moore just for SCOTUS nominations is counter-productive. Here are the last three paragraphs, which sum the argument up pretty well:

And this is the ultimate argument against anything to do with Trump. Mother was always right. Whether directly, or indirectly, you are who you associate with.