Roy Moore: Pedophile Pig

[happyone]

I seems that Judge Moore's problems are NOT playing well in the Great State of Alabama

A FOX news poll has him down 8, way out of the margin of error for the poll

His opponent is already at 50%

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/16/fox-news-poll-jones-leads-moore-by-8-points-in-alabama-senate-race.html

[pelagius]

Is this the generally accepted conclusion?

Nah (NW's being sarcastic) .. I think the following is a good summary of the signature issue: http://www.businessinsider.com/roy-m...nature-2017-11. I think the biggest legit criticism is that Allred is trying to use the yearbook as leverage to get a congressional hearing rather than just move in a straight forward way to verify/check the signature; it's not a good look, and creates a circus undertone. Still, I don't think anything the Moore campaign has responded with should move people's prior about it being real or forged very much. And it's such a small part overall evidence (e.g., the accounts of 9 or so victims at this point)

[myboynoah]

I bet the notoriety of becoming another star Moore accuser makes the insults and attacks on Ms. Nelson’s character totally worth it. Even trotting out an obviously forged signature is still a risk worth taking.

Is this the generally accepted conclusion?

[Northwestcoug]

I bet the notoriety of becoming another star Moore accuser makes the insults and attacks on Ms. Nelson’s character totally worth it. Even trotting out an obviously forged signature is still a risk worth taking.

[BlueK]

The only proof Ms. Nelson had to offer is something written in her yearbook signed "Roy Moore D.A." (the same way her divorce documents were signed stamped and initialed by Moore's court clerk of many years later). It is not like she offered a picture of Moore groping her or something...




What proof do you have that Roy Moore sexually assaulted women other than hearsay of him cruising the mall?

Roy Moore is a bible-thumping bigot, however. There is plenty proof of that. The dumbass dems need to focus on what they can prove.

Of course they can prove the bigotry. Sadly in today's Trump-led, corrupted Republican party it's completely irrelevant and even seen as a good thing by many, especially in places like Alabama. You would hope they'd care if the guy is a pedophile, but maybe they don't. Sad! As the drumpster would say.

[BlueK]

Dude, Moore's lawyer lied about this yesterday: https://www.thedailybeast.com/roy-mo...s-divorce-case

Oops

[old_gregg]

ok. thoughtful input.

[Uncle Ted]

what evidence would be persuasive to you in this circumstance?

How about one of the women's dresses with his DNA on it and maybe a few cigars?

[old_gregg]

The only proof Ms. Nelson had to offer is something written in her yearbook signed "Roy Moore D.A." (the same way her divorce documents were signed stamped and initialed by Moore's court clerk of many years later). It is not like she offered a picture of Moore groping her or something...




What proof do you have that Roy Moore sexually assaulted women other than hearsay of him cruising the mall?

Roy Moore is a bible-thumping bigot, however. There is plenty proof of that. The dumbass dems need to focus on what they can prove.

what evidence would be persuasive to you in this circumstance?

[Uncle Ted]

Are you serious? You want to lash out against the judge who is presiding over your divorce? Sounds like a great way to lose custody or get shorted on the division of the assets.

I think Moore only signed (or actually had his clerk stamp and initial) a document to dismiss her divorce case. Don't know the details but I guess Ms. Nelson patched things up with her husband and dropped the divorce or something.

[Walter Sobchak]

this is bizarre

car wreck.

chapp.jpg

[falafel]

Ms. Nelson looks very much like she is full of it: the signature on her yearbook (which she won't even show now) is suspect and her own step-son says she is full of sh*t. And she said she hadn't had any contact with Roy Moore since she was sexually assaulted even though Moore was the judge assigned to her divorce. Not to mention she has waited all this time along with these other women to finally come forward. Why didn't she mention anything when Moore was her divorce judge? I am betting now that most people will dismiss all these women's claims just based on Ms. Nelson is full of it and just think it is some dem election stunt. You should listen to PAC.

Are you serious? You want to lash out against the judge who is presiding over your divorce? Sounds like a great way to lose custody or get shorted on the division of the assets.

[old_gregg]

this is bizarre

[Uncle Ted]

You're more interesting when you're just a bot

Here is the link for your convenience: http://www.cougarstadium.com/showthr...=1#post1343050

[pelagius]

Ah, the signature stamp (and clerk initials) that Ms. Nelson copied for her late yearbook addition.

You're more interesting when you're just a bot