Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Great American Eclipse - Aug. 21, 2017

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pelado
    replied
    Totality is pretty cool (literally and figuratively).

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    IMG_4712.png

    Leave a comment:


  • beefytee
    replied
    I'm looking at upcoming total eclipsed. August (2026) in Iceland sound pretty awesome!

    Maybe Australia 2028 would work too. It's in July, so it might be pretty cold there.


    NASA - Solar Eclipses: 2021 - 2030

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    Originally posted by Moliere View Post
    Clouds literally moved in 30 seconds before totality…however we got about 60 seconds of totality when a small break in the clouds happened. Rey cool to see and worth the trouble. Temps dropped and birds went silent. The corona was mesmerizing. I may chase the next one in 20 years.
    Awesome!

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    Clouds literally moved in 30 seconds before totality…however we got about 60 seconds of totality when a small break in the clouds happened. Rey cool to see and worth the trouble. Temps dropped and birds went silent. The corona was mesmerizing. I may chase the next one in 20 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    ... I stepped outside.

    No comparison to totality, but still pretty darn cool

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott R Nelson
    replied
    Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
    I prefer some clouds during an eclipse so that you can look at the sun with the naked eye. We had one down in Nicaragua in 2005 that was like that.
    For a partial eclipse, yes. For totality, no. The big reward of a total eclipse is being able to look straight at the corona around the sun for the few minutes that totality lasts.

    I dug out my eclipse glasses from 2017, my wife and I went out and looked at the sun with a small chunk out of it, and that's it for this year.

    I haven't checked all of the TV stations, but at least CBS and ABC have "live" reporting from the various places along the route of totality. They're already done in Mazatlan, and they had around four minutes of it. I don't know why nobody shows how you can check the progress with two pieces of carboard, one with one or more holes punched into it. That would show up well on TV.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bo Diddley
    replied
    Originally posted by Moliere View Post
    Clouds are moving in so I’m hoping this thing hurries up.
    I prefer some clouds during an eclipse so that you can look at the sun with the naked eye. We had one down in Nicaragua in 2005 that was like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    Clouds are moving in so I’m hoping this thing hurries up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    IMG_4694.jpeg

    Leave a comment:


  • Moliere
    replied
    Originally posted by All-American View Post
    I travelled to Wyoming for the 2017 eclipse. Millions of people suddenly wanted to be in their car at the precise moment totality ended. The drive home, which normally would have taken a little more than three hours, took us fifteen.

    I get the emergency declarations.
    I'm a little worried about hte drive home. Totality should be done around 1:40pm but I've got a 20 mile drive back to Austin and then the drive back to Houston on SH290. I'm pretty sure a lot of the 6 million Houston residents came out this way so going back is going to be interesting. Thankfully there are two Bucees on the route back.

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott R Nelson View Post
    Today I will go outside about noon and check out the 35% that we're going to get in Idaho. I'll spend about two minutes doing that and my curiosity will be satisfied. I maybe spent five minutes last October checking out the partial from the annular eclipse.

    I'm hoping that some news organization will show a map, when this is all over, showing who had clear skies at totality and who missed it due to clouds in the way.
    I'm nowhere near totality. I doubt I'll even step outside.

    Leave a comment:


  • YOhio
    replied
    Hey all this talk about the eclipse makes me wonder why everyone is so excited just to get mooned? LOL! You can’t make this stuff up!

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott R Nelson
    replied
    Today I will go outside about noon and check out the 35% that we're going to get in Idaho. I'll spend about two minutes doing that and my curiosity will be satisfied. I maybe spent five minutes last October checking out the partial from the annular eclipse.

    I'm hoping that some news organization will show a map, when this is all over, showing who had clear skies at totality and who missed it due to clouds in the way.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pelado
    replied
    Originally posted by All-American View Post
    I travelled to Wyoming for the 2017 eclipse. Millions of people suddenly wanted to be in their car at the precise moment totality ended. The drive home, which normally would have taken a little more than three hours, took us fifteen.

    I get the emergency declarations.
    We drove north a bit, too, to be in the path of totality and I'm glad we did. We drove up there the night before the eclipse and stayed at a campground. We were concerned that the campground might be full but there only ended up being a handful of campers there. Driving south (back home) after the eclipse took a lot more time than driving north had. The route we took was not nearly as bad as others experienced.

    I had previously planned a couple other viewing destinations but had been dissuaded by concerns from some who expected the traffic to be terrible on the way there. I think that ended up being very overblown.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X