Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

On abortion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post
    I may be alone on this take, but the more we talk about this draft decision, the more I agree with it. I have no problem with returning the decision on whether to allow abortion, and under what circumstances, to the people themselves. The Daily's episode this morning discussed this topic (although somewhat heavy-handedly) and noted that in 25 or so states that already have some Roe trigger law on the books or are looking to pass something similar, those laws actually reflect the majority view of their populations. The the blue states either have similar laws protecting abortion already, or are scrambling to get them on the books. Whatever happened to allowing the states to be the laboratories of democracy? Or, as the opinion appears to state, allowing Congress to make laws instead of the Court?
    You are not alone.

    Is it the end of the world if there is some variation in abortion laws from state to state? Nobody seems too worked up that Italy has more strict abortion laws than Denmark.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
    So there is some hyperbole going around, and Twitter is certainly magnifying it. But the political climate now really feels unsettled. I would feel more confident if the state abortion laws that lead to the decision resembled anything reasonable. But almost all of them are draconian. If Roe goes, the frenzy that these state legislatures have created will not easily go away. At some point, we have to start believing what these people are saying: they are fighting for a near total ban on abortion.

    as to the other worries people are extrapolating, yeah some of it seems like a stretch. Still, states are feeling their oats right now. Don’t say gay, book bans, and other attacks on freedom are very worrisome. If Roe v Wade is unconstitutional, what’s stopping a state from arguing that Obergefell isn’t ‘deeply rooted in the nation’s history’? Even if a challenge doesn’t go to the Supreme Court, it is a good bet that a state will try it.

    it’s going to reverberate to other non-abortion political questions, no doubt. Both sides of the political divide are eager to fight culture wars. But one side has just found a lot of energy to fight, after losing their important wars for decades. I’m not optimistic.
    I have heard people argue that the reason we are so polarized is precisely because of Roe v. Wade. That ruling took us instantly to having one of the most permissive abortion laws in the world - a statement that is still true 50 years later. It was way out of line with the wishes of the American public. Without that ruling, we would have gradually settled in to a legislative solution over time, just like what has happened in Europe. But here we are.

    Leave a comment:


  • LVAllen
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post
    Whatever happened to allowing the states to be the laboratories of democracy?
    That would be the 14th Amendment. States developed quite the reputation for getting hinky with the Constitution.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
    So there is some hyperbole going around, and Twitter is certainly magnifying it.
    My favorite hyperbole is the "forced pregnancies". Yes, the government forced you to get pregnant.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    I may be alone on this take, but the more we talk about this draft decision, the more I agree with it. I have no problem with returning the decision on whether to allow abortion, and under what circumstances, to the people themselves. The Daily's episode this morning discussed this topic (although somewhat heavy-handedly) and noted that in 25 or so states that already have some Roe trigger law on the books or are looking to pass something similar, those laws actually reflect the majority view of their populations. The the blue states either have similar laws protecting abortion already, or are scrambling to get them on the books. Whatever happened to allowing the states to be the laboratories of democracy? Or, as the opinion appears to state, allowing Congress to make laws instead of the Court?

    Leave a comment:


  • Clark Addison
    replied
    The worst thing about this stupid leak is that we are getting all sorts of madness and crazy people, to the point that you almost can't go online, and then when the ruling actually comes out we get to do it all again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Northwestcoug
    replied
    So there is some hyperbole going around, and Twitter is certainly magnifying it. But the political climate now really feels unsettled. I would feel more confident if the state abortion laws that lead to the decision resembled anything reasonable. But almost all of them are draconian. If Roe goes, the frenzy that these state legislatures have created will not easily go away. At some point, we have to start believing what these people are saying: they are fighting for a near total ban on abortion.

    as to the other worries people are extrapolating, yeah some of it seems like a stretch. Still, states are feeling their oats right now. Don’t say gay, book bans, and other attacks on freedom are very worrisome. If Roe v Wade is unconstitutional, what’s stopping a state from arguing that Obergefell isn’t ‘deeply rooted in the nation’s history’? Even if a challenge doesn’t go to the Supreme Court, it is a good bet that a state will try it.

    it’s going to reverberate to other non-abortion political questions, no doubt. Both sides of the political divide are eager to fight culture wars. But one side has just found a lot of energy to fight, after losing their important wars for decades. I’m not optimistic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Honestly, I think the horrible take ratio on social media is at an all-time high right now. Never seen anything like it.
    Joe Biden joining in on the hyperbolic and stupid take crowd. I saw him on the TV this morning claiming 1) if this ruling stands, the next thing the court is going to do is ban LGBTQ kids from associating with straight kids in schools. And 2) the MAGA crowd is the most dangerous group in American history.

    Idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    I happen to have emotional management skis. Just put them away for spring though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
    Just in time for mother's day...
    What on earth?

    Leave a comment:


  • Uncle Ted
    replied
    Just in time for mother's day...



    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Lost Student
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    The sad thing is that I know someone who really looks up to Dr. Julie Hanks and believes her similarly unhinged rants about the church.
    I scrolled through her twitter feed. Lots of dumb tweets but mostly unremarkable, except it's funny that she hasn't figured out that there is a character limit.

    Here's a sampling. There are many more that also just cut off mid sente





    Last edited by Lost Student; 05-04-2022, 01:37 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by falafel View Post

    We aren't holding men responsible for unwanted pregnancies any more?? Can't wait to rip up those child support checks!!!
    The sad thing is that I know someone who really looks up to Dr. Julie Hanks and believes her similarly unhinged rants about the church.

    Leave a comment:


  • falafel
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post

    She doubled down. Lol.

    We aren't holding men responsible for unwanted pregnancies any more?? Can't wait to rip up those child support checks!!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X