Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Racial and ethnicity standards for neighborhoods...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Racial and ethnicity standards for neighborhoods...

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...neighborhoods/

    Thoughts?
    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


    "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

  • #2
    So - we're talking about government forced (or at least encouraged) integration?

    Sounds interesting.

    I like the idea of more diversity in all neighborhoods. I think that could do the most towards helping combat racism in the future. Not sure how functional it is to actually attempt, however.

    Comment


    • #3
      At issue is that all ethnic groups prefer to self segregate despite a social goal of diversity. We tend to want to live close to our own kind. And Mormons are no different.

      But I agree with Eddie that neighborhood or school diversity probably does more good toward combating racism than anything else. I know it to be true with my own family.

      It is something that federal and local government could encourage through the use of federal grants or property tax breaks. But it should go both ways. In other words, Whites living in Black, Hispanic, or Asian neighborhoods should receive the same incentives as minorities living in White neighborhoods. And it also brings into question a Mormon living in a Jewish neighborhood and vice-versa.

      But I don't think it is something that government should try to score and grant incentives. With many things being equal, Whites prefer to live next to other Whites and Blacks with other Blacks. Actually, keeping score and publishing this data will make it easier for people to self segregate.
      “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
      "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
        I think the argument is bullshit - if that is really what HUD is trying to do. Government cannot socially re-engineer society. It will fail miserably and then the next generation of progressives will point to this ill founded tactic as the new cause of the problems that their new tactic is meant to fix. In the 70's the progressive social engineers tried bussing and other forms of forced integration and how many worked?

        Housing is a function of economics and as more minorities improve their class status many will find themselves more comfortable in the neighborhoods with the better schools etc. Obviously exposure to those of other races, religions, ethnicities, sexual preferences, Ford vs Chevy, Polaris vs Skidoo, Army versus Navy or whatever else new bias or word for some other group being excluded is the soup of the day Flo, helps people to be less afraid/skeptical/bigoted towards that group. However, government is not going to effectively re-engineer society for that end. A man forced against his will is of the same opinion still...or something like that.

        I tend to believe the long arm of the universe bends towards justice and in time this issues will be fixed.

        So in essence I don't think it is good policy.
        Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
        -General George S. Patton

        I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
        -DOCTOR Wuap

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
          Housing is a function of economics and as more minorities improve their class status many will find themselves more comfortable in the neighborhoods with the better schools etc.
          This is correct. In the more racially diverse cities I've lived in, once a minority family becomes more financially successful, they move out of the ghetto and into suburbia with all of the white folk. It's not a race issue, it's the safety issue that accompanies impoverished neighborhoods.
          Everything in life is an approximation.

          http://twitter.com/CougarStats

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
            At issue is that all ethnic groups prefer to self segregate despite a social goal of diversity. We tend to want to live close to our own kind. And Mormons are no different.

            But I agree with Eddie that neighborhood or school diversity probably does more good toward combating racism than anything else. I know it to be true with my own family.

            It is something that federal and local government could encourage through the use of federal grants or property tax breaks. But it should go both ways. In other words, Whites living in Black, Hispanic, or Asian neighborhoods should receive the same incentives as minorities living in White neighborhoods. And it also brings into question a Mormon living in a Jewish neighborhood and vice-versa.

            But I don't think it is something that government should try to score and grant incentives. With many things being equal, Whites prefer to live next to other Whites and Blacks with other Blacks. Actually, keeping score and publishing this data will make it easier for people to self segregate.
            We are in no position to spend money on any large scale social integration. We're broke.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Eddie View Post
              So - we're talking about government forced (or at least encouraged) integration?

              Sounds interesting.

              I like the idea of more diversity in all neighborhoods. I think that could do the most towards helping combat racism in the future. Not sure how functional it is to actually attempt, however.
              Functionally it will be almost impossible to do and it would also seem unconstitutional (of course I'm not a lawyer so my analysis is probably way off).
              "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                Functionally it will be almost impossible to do and it would also seem unconstitutional (of course I'm not a lawyer so my analysis is probably way off).
                Not sure about the constitutionality of such a program, but what little I've heard about it doesn't sound legal or enforceable.
                "I think it was King Benjamin who said 'you sorry ass shitbags who have no skills that the market values also have an obligation to have the attitude that if one day you do in fact win the PowerBall Lottery that you will then impart of your substance to those without.'"
                - Goatnapper'96

                Comment

                Working...
                X