help me decipher a response I got on Facebook. The interchange went as follows:
Facebook poster - "All we can really do is think. Big red (i.e. "Republican party") has not shared a game plan on jobs, pay and recovery."
To which I posted link to Romney's 5-point plan.
Facebook poster - "Great! I sure hope big corporations will agree."
I then asked Obama supporters to help me understand their support in light of non-Fox News reports of stagnant economy and I received one response from this same poster:
"I will never blame any president in regards to the economy, fuel costs, trade[import/export], health cost, social security/medicare.etc...It is easy to focus on any president and pass good/bad judgment, which is just an opinion! Big corporations dictate growth and cost."
Did I read correctly that he doesn't think that (Romney) has put forth a plan for jobs, pay and recovery, and when shown that a plan HAS been put forth, he feels that benefits only big corporations, and then he goes on to say he does not blame a president for anything related to the economy?
I feel aghast that I believe I actually understood that he is a walking contradiction, however my mental acuity is failing in my furthering life experience, so if the guy is completely consistent, please help me understand that I should slip away quietly into the night.
Facebook poster - "All we can really do is think. Big red (i.e. "Republican party") has not shared a game plan on jobs, pay and recovery."
To which I posted link to Romney's 5-point plan.
Facebook poster - "Great! I sure hope big corporations will agree."
I then asked Obama supporters to help me understand their support in light of non-Fox News reports of stagnant economy and I received one response from this same poster:
"I will never blame any president in regards to the economy, fuel costs, trade[import/export], health cost, social security/medicare.etc...It is easy to focus on any president and pass good/bad judgment, which is just an opinion! Big corporations dictate growth and cost."
Did I read correctly that he doesn't think that (Romney) has put forth a plan for jobs, pay and recovery, and when shown that a plan HAS been put forth, he feels that benefits only big corporations, and then he goes on to say he does not blame a president for anything related to the economy?
I feel aghast that I believe I actually understood that he is a walking contradiction, however my mental acuity is failing in my furthering life experience, so if the guy is completely consistent, please help me understand that I should slip away quietly into the night.
Comment