How Poor Are America's Poor?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Indy Coug
    Heartless Bastard
    • Dec 2008
    • 18747

    #1

    How Poor Are America's Poor?

    To get the discussion rolling, start with reading this article.

    Everything in life is an approximation.

    http://twitter.com/CougarStats
  • Moliere
    One man.....one pie
    • Oct 2009
    • 27822

    #2
    Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
    To get the discussion rolling, start with reading this article.

    http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/01/news....htm?hpt=hp_t3
    Poverty is relative, which is why the truly poor of the world would be appalled at the complaints of the poor in the US. I'm not saying either is right or wrong, just that poor is relative.

    Now it's time for the Dems to push their eschatological view that the poor are getting poorer.
    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

    Comment

    • Uncle Ted
      The Big 12 money shot.
      • Apr 2010
      • 28853

      #3
      I wouldn't consider myself poor (nor would the author of this article) but I didn't own a flat screen TV until last week. My big *ss tube TV that I have had for the last 12 years wouldn't fit into the cabinet space of my new house. I had to break down and buy a flat screen. I guess I am joining the ranks of the poor.
      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

      Comment

      • Moliere
        One man.....one pie
        • Oct 2009
        • 27822

        #4
        Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
        I wouldn't consider myself poor (nor would the author of this article) but I didn't own a flat screen TV until last week. My big *ss tube TV that I have had for the last 12 years wouldn't fit into the cabinet space of my new house. I had to break down and buy a flat screen. I guess I am joining the ranks of the poor.
        I own 2 TVs. One is a 19inch tube TV MJ and I bought the week after our marriage. The other is a 39 incher flat screen we got 6 year ago. I think it's time to upgrade so I don't fall into the "poor and downtrodden" class.
        "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

        Comment

        • ERCougar
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 10978

          #5
          Most striking to me:
          62% of lowest income bracket own between 2 and 4 televisions and 33% own either LCD or plasma TV.
          while
          52% do not own a computer.

          There's a decision-making issue here.
          At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
          -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

          Comment

          • wuapinmon
            Soul Plumber
            • Dec 2008
            • 30711

            #6
            That's a very poor metric for determining poverty. I have seen abject shock-you poverty in my lifetime, and even in the worst slums in this hemisphere, people have fancy televisions. The poor are often poorer because they make uneducated decisions about how to spend their money.

            Make no mistake, there is awful awful poverty here in America. The Gulf States have areas that would make many people uncomfortable. Were it not for the Food Stamp program, America would have massive poverty and malnutrition.
            "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
            The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

            Comment

            • Indy Coug
              Heartless Bastard
              • Dec 2008
              • 18747

              #7
              Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
              Most striking to me:
              62% of lowest income bracket own between 2 and 4 televisions and 33% own either LCD or plasma TV.
              while
              52% do not own a computer.

              There's a decision-making issue here.
              That, by far, was the biggest item that stood out for me in that article.
              Everything in life is an approximation.

              http://twitter.com/CougarStats

              Comment

              • ERCougar
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 10978

                #8
                Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                That's a very poor metric for determining poverty. I have seen abject shock-you poverty in my lifetime, and even in the worst slums in this hemisphere, people have fancy televisions. The poor are often poorer because they make uneducated decisions about how to spend their money.

                Make no mistake, there is awful awful poverty here in America. The Gulf States have areas that would make many people uncomfortable. Were it not for the Food Stamp program, America would have massive poverty and malnutrition.
                Well, that's sort of a silly statement. Even the biggest welfare opponents support food stamps.

                There's an interesting podcast somewhere (I think freakonomics?) that basically states that happiness has more to do with comparison with neighbors than any absolute measures. I think poverty is similar.
                At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
                -Berry Trammel, 12/3/10

                Comment

                • Uncle Ted
                  The Big 12 money shot.
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 28853

                  #9
                  Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                  That's a very poor metric for determining poverty. I have seen abject shock-you poverty in my lifetime, and even in the worst slums in this hemisphere, people have fancy televisions. The poor are often poorer because they make uneducated decisions about how to spend their money.

                  Make no mistake, there is awful awful poverty here in America. The Gulf States have areas that would make many people uncomfortable. Were it not for the Food Stamp program, America would have massive poverty and malnutrition.
                  I agree with the above. Poor people make terrible (or "poor") decisions about how to spend their money.

                  A lot people that have a high net worth don't live like they are rich. They work hard, buy good quality but not big expensive homes, take cheap and infrequent vacations, and drink inexpensive beer like a lot of average Americans. The authors of the book The Millionaire Next Door interviewed a lot of these people. One interesting part of the book is the authors offer a bunch of money to high net worth individuals good money come to a nice hotel to be interviewed for this book. They had the hotel cater the event with a lots of expensive food and alcohol. The beer and the less expensive foods were consumed. Most of the very expensive food and alcohol was left untouched.

                  [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Millionaire-Next-Door-Thomas-Stanley/dp/0671015206"]Amazon.com: The Millionaire Next Door (9780671015206): Thomas J. Stanley, William D. Danko: Books@@AMEPARAM@@http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/21LiILnlkNL.@@AMEPARAM@@21LiILnlkNL[/ame]
                  Last edited by Uncle Ted; 08-01-2012, 07:48 AM.
                  "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                  "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                  "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                  GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                  Comment

                  • wuapinmon
                    Soul Plumber
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 30711

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
                    Well, that's sort of a silly statement. Even the biggest welfare opponents support food stamps.
                    I was attempting to denote that the absence of such programs in many countries is a root cause of many of Sally Struthers's many tears.
                    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                    Comment

                    • Paperback Writer
                      Signature won a Pulitzer
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 5211

                      #11
                      Originally posted by ERCougar View Post
                      There's a decision-making issue here.
                      I think a big "elephant" in the room that directly effects poverty is the decision to have children.
                      “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                      "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                      Comment

                      • SeattleUte
                        Faith crisis consultant
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 20837

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
                        To get the discussion rolling, start with reading this article.

                        http://money.cnn.com/2012/08/01/news....htm?hpt=hp_t3
                        I am not going to listen to someone who laughs at a heart transplant patient about what is or is not poor.
                        When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

                        --Jonathan Swift

                        Comment

                        • Indy Coug
                          Heartless Bastard
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 18747

                          #13
                          Originally posted by SeattleUte View Post
                          I am not going to listen to someone who laughs at a heart transplant patient about what is or is not poor.
                          Everything in life is an approximation.

                          http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                          Comment

                          • Omaha 680
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 11174

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                            I think a big "elephant" in the room that directly effects poverty is the decision to have children.
                            If you wait to have children until you are married and you graduate from high school, you have a very high probability of not being poor in the USA. Poor in the context of this staement means needing significant government assistance for a large portion of your life.

                            Comment

                            • Paperback Writer
                              Signature won a Pulitzer
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5211

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                              If you wait to have children until you are married and you graduate from high school, you have a very high probability of not being poor in the USA. Poor in the context of this staement means needing significant government assistance for a large portion of your life.
                              Not to mention if you wait to have children until you are married and graduate from college, you have a very high probability of being able to afford child care, transportation, and have a job that provides insurance.
                              “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                              "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                              Comment

                              Working...