Originally posted by SeattleUte
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Europe's train wreck in slow motion
Collapse
X
-
Hollande is super rich himself. Of course he used the media very well to portray himself as one of the people. Romney could learn from how he did it.Originally posted by oxcoug View PostAnd an increasing number of the few are now relocating to London.
Hollande is a huge problem.
Yet if I had been in France I am not entirely sure who I would have voted for. Sarkozy made corruption into an art form. He was also a modern-day Brutus. Look up how much Kadaffi did for Sarkozy and then what he did to him.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012...-2007-election
Comment
-
You just want to swing the 2012 election for Obama. Three RED states and a possible fourth for four would-be BLUE states. And we don't even get France in the deal.Originally posted by SeattleUte View PostHere's our chance. Let's trade Louisiana, Mississippi, West Virginia and Nevada for Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal. I wonder how this would affect BCS realignment.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
Both took a hit, but are 401K plans still down much? Based on my experience they aren't. I will agree though plans on retirement in '07 were dramatically affected. Basically 5 years with no return isn't good for accumulating retirement assets.Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostReal Estate and 401K plans. Both took a big hit. I think that's what is also hurting unemployment rates. People cannot afford to retire and are staying in the work force longer than planned leaving fewer openings for new college graduates and laid off workers.
My retirement is still a ways off but I thought I knew when I could retire based on historic stock market returns. Now, I just don't know.
Comment
-
Originally posted by edward777 View PostHollande is super rich himself. Of course he used the media very well to portray himself as one of the people. Romney could learn from how he did it.
Yet if I had been in France I am not entirely sure who I would have voted for. Sarkozy made corruption into an art form. He was also a modern-day Brutus. Look up how much Kadaffi did for Sarkozy and then what he did to him.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012...-2007-election

There are lots of pics of various world leaders shaking hands w/ various sketchy dictators - but is there any real evidence of Sarkozy being in that deep w/ Gadaffi?
When I read this article I see that (a) Gadaffi's son makes the allegation (super reliable source there) and (b) that the Guardian references one journalist who claims to have "seen" the documents - the article then waits until its last sentence to point out that Sarkozy's people deny the allegations.
So has any true evidence ever emerged?
As for Sarkozy making corruption an art - I'd be curious what you are referring to. Is there something other than this? Because corruption is an art in Moscow, Sofia and Bucharest - I'd say in France it's more of a gentleman's hobby.Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī
It can't all be wedding cake.
Comment
-
It's a fascinating article that confirms my belief that Alexander Hamilton was the most original, brilliant ahead of his time thinker among America's founders (Paine was no. 2).
The "Teutonic European nations'" banks were among those that over-lent to "Latin Europe". No? Why isn't it some solace to the Teutons that they are themselves substantially to blame for this mess.
Germany, for the first time in its life, needs to learn about sacrifices as well as rewards of belonging to a great multicultural nation or confederation.When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan Swift
Comment
-
I would rather not think about any European train wrecks this week.
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Now folks, this is how you do a humblebrag.Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View PostI would rather not think about any European train wrecks this week.
"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
They [401K balances] were certainly down in the timeframe of the article (2007-2010). But you are correct to point out that the stock market has recovered to a large extent since 2010. More so earlier in 2012 then right now.Originally posted by byu71 View PostBoth took a hit, but are 401K plans still down much? Based on my experience they aren't. I will agree though plans on retirement in '07 were dramatically affected. Basically 5 years with no return isn't good for accumulating retirement assets.
As you know, personal/family net worth depends on asset mix. Personally, stock market losses were more pronounced for me than real estate losses. Also, it's a lot easier to log into Fidelity to find out how much your net worth has declined then to get a real estate appraisal.
Also, a lot also depends on one's outlook. For me, my home is not really an investment in my mind although I realize it has significant value. My family needs a roof and owning a home is an alternative to renting. I don't include my home's value in my retirement planning since there's a good chance I might still live in it after I retire. So if real estate goes down 20-40%, I look at it as paying less in property taxes. Conversely, if my 401K goes down 20-40%, it means I will retire later than planned. That loss is more real to me. But that's just my situation, I realize others might be the opposite.“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
Yes! Moliere has the gift.Originally posted by Moliere View PostNow folks, this is how you do a humblebrag."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
The UK Guardian is usually pretty good about sources. Here is another article: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fea...142288147.htmlOriginally posted by oxcoug View PostThere are lots of pics of various world leaders shaking hands w/ various sketchy dictators - but is there any real evidence of Sarkozy being in that deep w/ Gadaffi?
When I read this article I see that (a) Gadaffi's son makes the allegation (super reliable source there) and (b) that the Guardian references one journalist who claims to have "seen" the documents - the article then waits until its last sentence to point out that Sarkozy's people deny the allegations.
So has any true evidence ever emerged?
As for Sarkozy making corruption an art - I'd be curious what you are referring to. Is there something other than this? Because corruption is an art in Moscow, Sofia and Bucharest - I'd say in France it's more of a gentleman's hobby.
One wonders the real reasons behind France being all too willing to kill Kadaffi with the excuse of protecting civilians. Seriously, does anyone actually believe Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron give a you-know-what about Middle Eastern people?
Comment
-
Originally posted by edward777 View PostThe UK Guardian is usually pretty good about sources.
- no offense Edward, but that's a pretty lazy comment. I've seen some very shoddy reporting from the Guardian over the years, starting when I lived in the UK for four years. But more important than source issues is the Guardian's very pronounced political bias - which is both anti-Sarkozy and anti-Cameron.
I'm sure you know that Al Jazeera isn't any better. And the fact that this story apparently doesn't get attention in any responsible centrist or center right publication is pretty telling.
Well, first off - those three don't function as a unit or a block - in fact Sarkozy and Cameron are from political parties that sit across the aisle opposite Obama's natural allies in their respective countries.Originally posted by edward777 View Post
One wonders the real reasons behind France being all too willing to kill Kadaffi with the excuse of protecting civilians. Seriously, does anyone actually believe Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron give a you-know-what about Middle Eastern people?
Second - actually, yeah. I do. Why wouldn't they? What cause do you have to suggest they don't? Are you suggesting they're all just misanthropes...or?Last edited by oxcoug; 06-13-2012, 12:35 PM.Ute-ī sunt fīmī differtī
It can't all be wedding cake.
Comment
-
France's history in northern Europe is quite extensive, although not so much in Libya. But when you are talking about Algeria and Morocco, France has had significant interests in those countries and, from what I understand, France gets a lot of oil from Libya. There is definitely economic interests and also interests in neighboring countries for France.Originally posted by edward777 View PostThe UK Guardian is usually pretty good about sources. Here is another article: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fea...142288147.html
One wonders the real reasons behind France being all too willing to kill Kadaffi with the excuse of protecting civilians. Seriously, does anyone actually believe Obama, Sarkozy and Cameron give a you-know-what about Middle Eastern people?
My hypothesize is that France ghostly pumped up Kadaffi for a long time as he stablized the country (and thus allowed France to trade with them) but when it became apparent Kadaffi was going down they obviously sided with the rebellion in an attempt to keep their own economic interests in tact."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Well, I would hope so - it probably dates earlier than Charlemagne. I know you meant northern Africa but I couldn't resistOriginally posted by Moliere View PostFrance's history in northern Europe is quite extensive...
“Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
"All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paperback Writer View PostWell, I would hope so - it probably dates earlier than Charlemagne. I know you meant northern Africa but I couldn't resist
.....I meant Northern Africa!!!
[I'm mad at myself]"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
Comment