I'll follow up with another lame argument put forward by Fox News commentators last night. They all talked about how voter turnout was lower than 2008 and projected that Mitt would receive just about the same number of votes that he did in 2008.
Well, the numbers are in and they were wrong on both counts. Not only was turnout higher than in 2008 (242,960 vs 239,315) but Romney received almost 20k votes more than in 2008 (95,668 vs 75,546).
Does anyone remember such lame reporting in 2008 about McCain, a candidate who was very unlike likely to stimulate the Republican base?
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/nh
http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/rpressum.htm
Well, the numbers are in and they were wrong on both counts. Not only was turnout higher than in 2008 (242,960 vs 239,315) but Romney received almost 20k votes more than in 2008 (95,668 vs 75,546).
Does anyone remember such lame reporting in 2008 about McCain, a candidate who was very unlike likely to stimulate the Republican base?
http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/primaries/state/nh
http://www.sos.nh.gov/presprim2008/rpressum.htm

Comment