Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is your candidate?
Collapse
X
-
Crap.
1. Obama
2. Paul
3. HuntsmanAin't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
-
Obama
Romney
Huntsman
"There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
I don't love ny of the GOPers, but I'd take any of them over Obama. Even Gingrich, even Paul, even (gulp) Bachmann. If Obama can have handlers feeding him every line and policy, then conservatives can do the same thing for Bachmann.
I like Santorum. He's a little more conservative than me on some social issues, but he's probably the most consistently conservative, least flip-floppy of the bunch. I like that he actually talks abut getting manufacturing back into this country. And in a way that would work, unlike the top-down socialistic policies of the left.
I like Mitt...I'll admit, it's because he's LDS. Plus I think he's probably a good man. I mean he was a stake president, so we can trust him!
I actually like alot of what Huntsman has to say, but I can't stand his arrogant, condescending personality. He's like Obama in that respect...a douche."Remember to double tap"
Comment
-
Bachman
Obama
Newt
I'm going to agree with those who said the answer options sucked. For many of the questions, there were a couple of answers that matched part of what I felt - so I just went with one. When I went back and switched a couple of those answers, I still had Bachman among my three, but Obama and Newt were replaced by Mitt and Huntsman.
Part of me likes the idea of holding an election this way. Pick your position on the issues, then weigh them based on a rating of which issue is most important through which is least important. Then have the computer pick who gets your vote.
Obviously they would have to have multiple choices for what your position is on an issue, but I think the results would be interesting.
Comment
Comment