I've seen Krugman on the ABC Sunday Morning show and he has some very strange mannerisms. If one makes judgments based on mannerisms (and some, if not most people usually do), then there's something off about the guy.
There are many people that simply pick a political team and seem to fall in line with what the ideology dictates they should believe in. I've never really quite understood the nexus between being a fiscal conservative and being a bible thumper. But I've also never understood the alliance that existed between the northeast liberal wing of the Democratic party (Woodrow Wilson-FDR-JFK) and the southern democrats. Krugman picked a political and economic team and balanced thought escapes him far more than even most ideologues.
Some of his comments regarding the destruction of roads, buildings, bridges, etc. presenting an opportunity for economic stimulus are just downright bizarre. I just can't understand the mentality that it doesn't matter how money is spent as long as it is spent. Technology and automation have created massive amounts of wealth worldwide, and I think resources will usually naturally be funneled towards innovation. The frustrating thing about how a significant portion of tax money is spent is that it doesn't seem to be going in a direction that will add any wealth to the economy. At the same time, it takes money away from parties/forces that would naturally direct the capital towards innovation.
There are many people that simply pick a political team and seem to fall in line with what the ideology dictates they should believe in. I've never really quite understood the nexus between being a fiscal conservative and being a bible thumper. But I've also never understood the alliance that existed between the northeast liberal wing of the Democratic party (Woodrow Wilson-FDR-JFK) and the southern democrats. Krugman picked a political and economic team and balanced thought escapes him far more than even most ideologues.
Some of his comments regarding the destruction of roads, buildings, bridges, etc. presenting an opportunity for economic stimulus are just downright bizarre. I just can't understand the mentality that it doesn't matter how money is spent as long as it is spent. Technology and automation have created massive amounts of wealth worldwide, and I think resources will usually naturally be funneled towards innovation. The frustrating thing about how a significant portion of tax money is spent is that it doesn't seem to be going in a direction that will add any wealth to the economy. At the same time, it takes money away from parties/forces that would naturally direct the capital towards innovation.
Comment