what are your thoughts about this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Physicians on the board....
Collapse
X
-
I am not a physician but I think it sucks that the NYT requires us to login to read their crap."If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
"I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
"Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
-
I gotta keep up on what the other side says, no?Originally posted by ERCougar View PostIPU subscribes to the NYT?? Didn't see that one coming.
Can you give us a synopsis?
Anyway, it's an article about the Obama administration using "mystery shoppers" to see how accessible doctors are.
A few paragraphs from the article that are pertinent:
It also goes on about a "critical public policy problem" of a shortage of primary care, including specialists in internal and family care.Alarmed by a shortage of primary care doctors, Obama administration officials are recruiting a team of “mystery shoppers” to pose as patients, call doctors’ offices and request appointments to see how difficult it is for people to get care when they need it.
There are then a few quotes from docs around the country who oppose this saying things like the government is spying on them and that they think it's a waste of tax dollars. One doc was quoted as saying "Anyone with a brain knows we have a doctor shortage."Plans for the survey have riled many doctors because the secret shoppers will not identify themselves as working for the government.
“I don’t like the idea of the government snooping,” said Dr. Raymond Scalettar, an internist in Washington. “It’s a pernicious practice — Big Brother tactics, which should be opposed.”
According to government documents obtained from Obama administration officials, the mystery shoppers will call medical practices and ask if doctors are accepting new patients and, if so, how long the wait would be. The government is eager to know whether doctors give different answers to callers depending on whether they have public insurance, like Medicaid, or private insurance, like Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
It then goes on to say that the Mass. healthcare program has resulted in long waits for appointments, such as 36 days for family docs and 48 for internists. Also, that about half of the docs in Mass. are not seeing new patients.In response to the drumbeat of criticism, a federal health official said doctors need not worry because the data would be kept confidential. “Reports will present aggregate data, and individuals will not be identified,” said the official, who requested anonymity to discuss the plan before its final approval by the White House.
It seems that the reason for this is that the feds want to know what the affect Obamacare is going to have on getting healthcare once it's implemented fully. IMO, they're trying to find out if what they told the public what was going to happen is really going to happen when they were shoving Obamacare down our throats."Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader
Comment
-
JIC is probably the one to answer this. It doesn't really bug me that they're studying this, but I'm not a primary care doctor.At least the Big Ten went after a big-time addition in Nebraska; the Pac-10 wanted a game so badly, it added Utah
-Berry Trammel, 12/3/10
Comment
Comment