Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As smart as Obama supposedly is, he clearly doesn't understand economics...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • As smart as Obama supposedly is, he clearly doesn't understand economics...

    I've seen this clip probably a hundred times and only now do I realize that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/planet...greg-pollowitz

    He follows talk about rates "necessarily skyrocketing" saying why they would skyrocket - "because I'm capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas, whatever the industry is, they would have to retro-fit their operations. That will cost money - they will pass that money onto consumers."

    Really? THAT is why costs would "necessarily skyrocket?"

    The greatest among us has obviously never heard of inelastic demand - restrict supply of a good with an inelastic demand, and the price of that good goes through the roof - it necessarily skyrockets.

    Obviously some adviser fed him the bs line about retrofitting. But retrofitting is the least of our worries. Incredibly high prices - and enormous profits for energy companies - are the result of limiting the supply of goods we can literally not do without. Small wonder that every energy company in the US is fully on board with "Cap and Trade" and with Obama. There's a butt-load of money to be made from the misery he's peddlin'.

  • #2
    What does Obama think about Davies?
    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
      What does Obama think about Davies?
      that clearly he skyrocketed unnecessarily .

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Babs View Post
        that clearly he skyrocketed unnecessarily .
        Skyrockets at night...

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by statman View Post
          I've seen this clip probably a hundred times and only now do I realize that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

          http://www.nationalreview.com/planet...greg-pollowitz

          He follows talk about rates "necessarily skyrocketing" saying why they would skyrocket - "because I'm capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas, whatever the industry is, they would have to retro-fit their operations. That will cost money - they will pass that money onto consumers."

          Really? THAT is why costs would "necessarily skyrocket?"

          The greatest among us has obviously never heard of inelastic demand - restrict supply of a good with an inelastic demand, and the price of that good goes through the roof - it necessarily skyrockets.

          Obviously some adviser fed him the bs line about retrofitting. But retrofitting is the least of our worries. Incredibly high prices - and enormous profits for energy companies - are the result of limiting the supply of goods we can literally not do without. Small wonder that every energy company in the US is fully on board with "Cap and Trade" and with Obama. There's a butt-load of money to be made from the misery he's peddlin'.

          I am not sure if increasing oil prices would be good for unemployment and the president's approval ratings but may be a good thing for reducing our dependence on foreign oil.

          In short, what higher oil prices might mean:

          the good: reduced dependence on foreign oil and nobama after the next election cycle

          the bad: higher unemployment and a good chance of some dumbass republican for the president after the next election cycle

          the ugly: maybe more war in the middle east to control that market.
          "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
          "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
          "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
          GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by statman View Post
            I've seen this clip probably a hundred times and only now do I realize that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

            http://www.nationalreview.com/planet...greg-pollowitz

            He follows talk about rates "necessarily skyrocketing" saying why they would skyrocket - "because I'm capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas, whatever the industry is, they would have to retro-fit their operations. That will cost money - they will pass that money onto consumers."

            Really? THAT is why costs would "necessarily skyrocket?"

            The greatest among us has obviously never heard of inelastic demand - restrict supply of a good with an inelastic demand, and the price of that good goes through the roof - it necessarily skyrockets.

            Obviously some adviser fed him the bs line about retrofitting. But retrofitting is the least of our worries. Incredibly high prices - and enormous profits for energy companies - are the result of limiting the supply of goods we can literally not do without. Small wonder that every energy company in the US is fully on board with "Cap and Trade" and with Obama. There's a butt-load of money to be made from the misery he's peddlin'.
            Monopoly price without the monopoly.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by statman View Post
              I've seen this clip probably a hundred times and only now do I realize that he doesn't know what he's talking about.

              http://www.nationalreview.com/planet...greg-pollowitz

              He follows talk about rates "necessarily skyrocketing" saying why they would skyrocket - "because I'm capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas, whatever the industry is, they would have to retro-fit their operations. That will cost money - they will pass that money onto consumers."

              Really? THAT is why costs would "necessarily skyrocket?"

              The greatest among us has obviously never heard of inelastic demand - restrict supply of a good with an inelastic demand, and the price of that good goes through the roof - it necessarily skyrockets.

              Obviously some adviser fed him the bs line about retrofitting. But retrofitting is the least of our worries. Incredibly high prices - and enormous profits for energy companies - are the result of limiting the supply of goods we can literally not do without. Small wonder that every energy company in the US is fully on board with "Cap and Trade" and with Obama. There's a butt-load of money to be made from the misery he's peddlin'.
              Demand of oil/gas is inelastic? Maybe in the short-term but not necessarily the long-term, which is how the caps would be put into place. The idea would be to lower the cap gradually so as to not put incredible strains on the demand/supply relationship. Obviously costs will go up, but probably not as much as the Beckites are predicting.

              And as for every energy company being on board with cap and trade, simply not true...not even in a generalized statement format.

              FTR, I think cap and trade as national policy is a stupid idea, but there are better reasons to be against it then what is shown in that clip.
              "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Portland Ute View Post
                Skyrockets at night...
                Correction:
                Skyrockets in flight. Afternoon delight.

                I'm embarassed to know the lyrics to this melody. Watched Good Will Hunting one too many times.
                “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Paperback Writer View Post
                  Correction:
                  Skyrockets in flight. Afternoon delight.

                  I'm embarassed to know the lyrics to this melody. Watched Good Will Hunting one too many times.
                  Good Will Hunting? What about Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                    Good Will Hunting? What about Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy?
                    Arrested Development.
                    A man who views the world the same at fifty as he did at twenty has wasted thirty years of his life. - Mohammad Ali

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X