Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Warren Buffett NYT Op-Ed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Warren Buffett NYT Op-Ed

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/17/op...t.html?_r=1&hp

    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

  • #2
    The Oracle is now doing satire?
    "Nobody listens to Turtle."
    -Turtle
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      That is a very good op-Ed (not the the Oracle needs my approval). I didn't like TARP but I also think it was the lesser evil. It's nice to see him give props to Bush, who really did lead the country through that time when he could have just sat back and do nothing for his last couple months.
      "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Eddie Jones View Post
        That is a very good op-Ed (not the the Oracle needs my approval). I didn't like TARP but I also think it was the lesser evil. It's nice to see him give props to Bush, who really did lead the country through that time when he could have just sat back and do nothing for his last couple months.
        I know some of the extremists within the Tea Party crowd are anti TARP, but I was of the opinion that it had mainstream support among all political flavors. Sort of like the Iraq War in 2003.
        Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
        -General George S. Patton

        I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
        -DOCTOR Wuap

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
          I know some of the extremists within the Tea Party crowd are anti TARP, but I was of the opinion that it had mainstream support among all political flavors. Sort of like the Iraq War in 2003.
          Bob Bennett's TARP vote was one of the main reasons he lost his seat in the Utah GOP convention.

          Comment


          • #6
            If we hadn't passed TARP, we might actually be in better shape right now. On the other hand if we didn't pass TARP we might be in an all out depression and economic collapse.

            I wouldn't want a do over to see if maybe not passing it would have turned out better.

            Kind of reminds me of those who now claim Bush was mistaken for going to war with Iraq. Well, how do you know for sure. Maybe both Iraq and Iran would be in a race to get the nukes right now.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by YOhio View Post
              Bob Bennett's TARP vote was one of the main reasons he lost his seat in the Utah GOP convention.
              The Utah Caucaus is a stupid method of electing party reps for the primary. If Bob Bennet is in the primary he wins, if Bob Bennet is in the election as an independent he wins. Bennet was run out by a gang of disproportionately empowered delegates who represent that minority bat shit crazy right wing of the Tea Party. Obviously with the RI and Nevada debacles, this gang has some clout but I think as the emotions subside so will their clout. Nothing more than right wing populism.

              My point is if Bennet got to any general election where the disproportionate power of the wackos was marginalized by the voting masses he would win handily in very conservative Utah.
              Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
              -General George S. Patton

              I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
              -DOCTOR Wuap

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
                The Utah Caucaus is a stupid method of electing party reps for the primary. If Bob Bennet is in the primary he wins, if Bob Bennet is in the election as an independent he wins. Bennet was run out by a gang of disproportionately empowered delegates who represent that minority bat shit crazy right wing of the Tea Party. Obviously with the RI and Nevada debacles, this gang has some clout but I think as the emotions subside so will their clout. Nothing more than right wing populism.

                My point is if Bennet got to any general election where the disproportionate power of the wackos was marginalized by the voting masses he would win handily in very conservative Utah.
                I agree, and I would add Alaska, Deleware, and Colorado to your list of states that the Tea Party canidate caused heart burn.

                I may be small, but I'm slow.

                A veteran - whether active duty, retired, or national guard or reserve is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to, "The United States of America ", for an amount of "up to and including my life - it's an honor."

                Comment


                • #9
                  It was time for Bennet to go.

                  IMO Congress shouldn't be a lifetime career for anybody.
                  "We should remember that one man is much the same as another, and that he is best who is trained in the severest school."
                  -Thucydides

                  "Study strategy over the years and achieve the spirit of the warrior. Today is victory over yourself of yesterday; tomorrow is your victory over lesser men."
                  -Miyamoto Musashi

                  Si vis pacem, para bellum

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
                    The Utah Caucaus is a stupid method of electing party reps for the primary. If Bob Bennet is in the primary he wins, if Bob Bennet is in the election as an independent he wins. Bennet was run out by a gang of disproportionately empowered delegates who represent that minority bat shit crazy right wing of the Tea Party. Obviously with the RI and Nevada debacles, this gang has some clout but I think as the emotions subside so will their clout. Nothing more than right wing populism.

                    My point is if Bennet got to any general election where the disproportionate power of the wackos was marginalized by the voting masses he would win handily in very conservative Utah.
                    You have just described why the Utah Caucus system is so great.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's no surprise that the Oracle is pleased with TARP and the like. He benefited as much or more than anyone.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Devildog View Post
                        It was time for Bennet to go.

                        IMO Congress shouldn't be a lifetime career for anybody.
                        Why was it time for him to go? Over voting for TARP? The overwhelming majority of economists I have read on the subject believed TARP was the best thing to do given the circumstances. Was it time for Bennet to go because he had the audacity to work with Sen Ron Wyden to put together a health care reform bill that had the chance of being bi-partisan and far superior than the one we got?

                        One aspect of the Tea Party that makes me chuckle is the demand for term limits. That is a right wing populist effort to surrender individual liberties for the government to protect us all. An engaged and voting electorate can end anybody's career in DC. I know you are not advocating term limits, or perhaps you are, but I just don't think they are the way to go. Beyond the efforts to have Big Brother protect us, in a way we can protect ourselves, it would lead to our government being even more run by lobbyists and bureacrats.

                        I thought Senator Bennet had been a very good Senator for Utah. If there was one who needed to go it was he who sings duets with Sister Janice Kapp Perry. But I don't vote in your state. Here in Idaho we just got our mormon percentage of the delegation to 75%, albeit one is very much a Jack.
                        Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
                        -General George S. Patton

                        I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
                        -DOCTOR Wuap

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by happyone View Post
                          I agree, and I would add Alaska, Deleware, and Colorado to your list of states that the Tea Party canidate caused heart burn.
                          I like aspects of the Tea Party. I like really conservative Senators. I prefer they not go overnight from a witch to anti-masturbation Evangelical ministers.

                          I think we conservatives need to realize that we will not get a strong majority of conservatives in the Senate. You can have very conservative Senators from South Carolin, Idaho or even Texas. You can't have very many from Colorado or Delaware.

                          But that lesson is being learned and Mrs Palin is being marginalized into TLC reality shows that are so "flippin' fun!" She does have a nice ass for a 50 year old!
                          Do Your Damnedest In An Ostentatious Manner All The Time!
                          -General George S. Patton

                          I'm choosing to mostly ignore your fatuity here and instead overwhelm you with so much data that you'll maybe, just maybe, realize that you have reams to read on this subject before you can contribute meaningfully to any conversation on this topic.
                          -DOCTOR Wuap

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Goatnapper'96 View Post
                            I like aspects of the Tea Party. I like really conservative Senators. I prefer they not go overnight from a witch to anti-masturbation Evangelical ministers.

                            I think we conservatives need to realize that we will not get a strong majority of conservatives in the Senate. You can have very conservative Senators from South Carolin, Idaho or even Texas. You can't have very many from Colorado or Delaware.But that lesson is being learned and Mrs Palin is being marginalized into TLC reality shows that are so "flippin' fun!" She does have a nice ass for a 50 year old!
                            It has always amazed me that so many in politics would rather have no loaf than half a loaf. My opinion agrees with the late William Buckley - you nominate the most conservative canidate WHO CAN WIN. It does absolutely no good to nominate someone who is idologically pure, but has no chance of winning - re Deleware

                            This sentiment applies to left also. It is really amuses me to hear the Democrats in Utah complain about Mathison not being Democratic enough, when if they nominated anyone idologically pure, he would lose in a landslide.
                            Last edited by happyone; 11-17-2010, 12:59 PM.

                            I may be small, but I'm slow.

                            A veteran - whether active duty, retired, or national guard or reserve is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to, "The United States of America ", for an amount of "up to and including my life - it's an honor."

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by happyone View Post
                              My opinion is agrees with the late William Buckley - you nominate the most conservative canidate WHO CAN WIN. It does absolutely no good to nominate someone who is idologically pure, but has no chance of winning - re Deleware
                              Buckley was a big supporter of Barry Goldwater.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X