Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 2010 Census...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 2010 Census...

    is an example of the invasion of privacy. According to it's own website, it asks 2 questions that the bureau claims are necessary for an accurate count.

    Wrong.

    I'd really like the bureau to explain where in the Constitution is states that questions 4 and 5 are required to get an accurate count of the population.

    If folks want to give that info, that's your call, but remember that you're not required to do it.
    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


    "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

  • #2
    Why does the government need to know my shoe size?
    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Eddie Jones View Post
      Why does the government need to know my shoe size?
      To get an idea about how powerful a bomb you might be hiding.
      "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


      "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
        is an example of the invasion of privacy. According to it's own website, it asks 2 questions that the bureau claims are necessary for an accurate count.

        Wrong.

        I'd really like the bureau to explain where in the Constitution is states that questions 4 and 5 are required to get an accurate count of the population.

        If folks want to give that info, that's your call, but remember that you're not required to do it.
        Watch out. They're coming for you. I hope you've got plenty of ammunition.

        Comment


        • #5
          Meh. I wouldn't want telemarketers or the ugly girl that had a crush on me sophomore year of high school to have my phone number, but considering the government has legal, legit access to tens of millions of phone numbers, potentially being a part of that list isn't particularly bothersome.
          "I don't know the origin of said bitch booming."-Art Vandelay
          "Hot Lunch posted awhile back on this. He knows more than anyone except for maybe BO."-Seattle Ute

          Comment


          • #6
            #1 The laws covering the release of this info to anyone but the Bureau of the Census are ironclad. No personal data can be released for 80 years, not even with a subpoena/warrant/etc.

            #2 The names of people living at an "address" have been collected since the first Census.

            #3 Actually, it is against the law not to answer Census questions. They will actually bring out (so they threaten) federal marshals if someone refuses to comply.

            10. Do I have to respond to the 2010 Census?
            Yes, your participation in the 2010 Census is vital and required by law. Title 13 section 221 of the United States Code requires your response. Title 13 also requires that the Census Bureau keep respondents’ answers confidential and uses them only for tabulations that do not reveal any personal data about individuals or households.
            http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/ConstituentFAQ.pdf
            "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
            The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
              #1 The laws covering the release of this info to anyone but the Bureau of the Census are ironclad. No personal data can be released for 80 years, not even with a subpoena/warrant/etc.

              #2 The names of people living at an "address" have been collected since the first Census.

              #3 Actually, it is against the law not to answer Census questions. They will actually bring out (so they threaten) federal marshals if someone refuses to comply.



              http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/ConstituentFAQ.pdf

              Thank goodness for the law. That will protect us unless of course the WH wants go gain access.......which has been done before. Naturally, it was not intentional, just a mistake. I notice there isn't the obvious question: are you a citizen of the US. If not why should you count?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                #1 The laws covering the release of this info to anyone but the Bureau of the Census are ironclad. No personal data can be released for 80 years, not even with a subpoena/warrant/etc.

                #2 The names of people living at an "address" have been collected since the first Census.

                #3 Actually, it is against the law not to answer Census questions. They will actually bring out (so they threaten) federal marshals if someone refuses to comply.



                http://2010.census.gov/partners/pdf/ConstituentFAQ.pdf
                Using Pelosi's thought process, it said I had to answer all the questions. But nowhere did it say the answers had to be accurate. Got it.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                  #1 The laws covering the release of this info to anyone but the Bureau of the Census are ironclad. No personal data can be released for 80 years, not even with a subpoena/warrant/etc.
                  That's not my issue.

                  #2 The names of people living at an "address" have been collected since the first Census.
                  Link please. I honestly can't find one to see for myself. Also, I didn't put my name anywhere on the 2000 Census and don't remember a question asking about the names of those who lived at the address. I'm in the same house now as I was then.

                  #3 Actually, it is against the law not to answer Census questions. They will actually bring out (so they threaten) federal marshals if someone refuses to comply.
                  Can you show me where in the Constitution that it is required to give my name and phone number?

                  My understanding is that it's a $100 fine to not answer the questions. It would be worth it.
                  "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                  "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Hallelujah View Post
                    Thank goodness for the law. That will protect us unless of course the WH wants go gain access.......which has been done before. Naturally, it was not intentional, just a mistake. I notice there isn't the obvious question: are you a citizen of the US. If not why should you count?
                    Because people use resources, regardless of citizenship. I'm starting to worry that you actually believe all the Wednesday that comes out of your mouth. I just can't believe that someone who rarely, if ever, shows any critical thought about an issue is in medical school. I know you said that you were, but unless you're playing a 'character' named Hallelujah (genius, if that's true), then I still doubt that you are what you claim to be.

                    Hell, even dabrockster runs circles around you in the thinking department.
                    "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                    The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
                      That's not my issue.

                      Link please. I honestly can't find one to see for myself. Also, I didn't put my name anywhere on the 2000 Census and don't remember a question asking about the names of those who lived at the address. I'm in the same house now as I was then.

                      Can you show me where in the Constitution that it is required to give my name and phone number?

                      My understanding is that it's a $100 fine to not answer the questions. It would be worth it.
                      http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decenni...s/1790m-02.pdf

                      Can you show me where in the Constitution it says that you cannot use freon in your air conditioner? That you have to prove your identity in order to vote?

                      I was a Census enumerator in 2000, and I can assure you, beyond any inkling of a shadow of a doubt that the names were collected on the short and the long forms.

                      Title 13, Section 221
                      (a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or
                      willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any
                      other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce
                      or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the
                      Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his
                      knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in
                      connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I,
                      II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to
                      the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or
                      farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not
                      more than $100.
                      (b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a)
                      of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances
                      described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is
                      false, shall be fined not more than $500.
                      (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no person
                      shall be compelled to disclose information relative to his
                      religious beliefs or to membership in a religious body.
                      "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                      The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
                        To get an idea about how powerful a bomb you might be hiding.
                        You know what they say about the size of your feet...
                        "In conclusion, let me give a shout-out to dirty sex. What a great thing it is" - Northwestcoug
                        "And you people wonder why you've had extermination orders issued against you." - landpoke
                        "Can't . . . let . . . foolish statements . . . by . . . BYU fans . . . go . . . unanswered . . . ." - LA Ute

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post
                          That's not my issue.

                          Link please. I honestly can't find one to see for myself. Also, I didn't put my name anywhere on the 2000 Census and don't remember a question asking about the names of those who lived at the address. I'm in the same house now as I was then.

                          Can you show me where in the Constitution that it is required to give my name and phone number?

                          My understanding is that it's a $100 fine to not answer the questions. It would be worth it.
                          Here is some background on that:

                          http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_cens.html

                          It isn't in the constitution but was in the first census:

                          The act directed that the names of the heads of families be recorded, the number of white males sixteen and older, the number of white males under sixteen, the number of white females, the number of all other free persons, and the number of slaves. Failure of an assistant marshal to make a return, or to make a false return, was punishable by a $200 fine. Failure of a marshal to do the same was punishable by a fine of up to $800. The questions about profession, and other information Representative Sedgwick spoke of, were not made part of the final census. Census day was set at the first Monday in August, 1790. Failure to cooperate with a marshal or assistant was punishable by a $20 fine.
                          Looks like it might be the same fines in place today based on what you said.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                            http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decenni...s/1790m-02.pdf

                            Can you show me where in the Constitution it says that you cannot use freon in your air conditioner? That you have to prove your identity in order to vote?

                            I was a Census enumerator in 2000, and I can assure you, beyond any inkling of a shadow of a doubt that the names were collected on the short and the long forms.

                            Title 13, Section 221
                            Not being able to use freon in my air conditioner isn't a problem for me. I don't consider air conditioning a right. - Strike one

                            I wish there was something in the Constitution that stated that I had to prove my identity so there would be no chance that a non-citizen would vote. - Strike two

                            Well, my name wasn't collected because I didn't give out that info. I would remember doing that.
                            "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill


                            "I only know what I hear on the news." - Dear Leader

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by il Padrino Ute View Post

                              Well, my name wasn't collected because I didn't give out that info. I would remember doing that.
                              Since I'm still up at bat with a 0-2 count, I'll take a final swing.

                              Where in the Constitution does is say that you have a RIGHT to Privacy? (foul tip, out of play)

                              I respect your decision not to share the information, though I think that the entire genealogical work of the Church would be frustrated if everyone did this. Census information is a Spirit of Elijah goldmine.

                              And Mac just hit a frozen rope into the left field bleachers!
                              "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                              The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X