Common denominator of lds democrats

[grapevine]

I have a hard time keeping this up long enough to put these people's justifications in here. Alex Nibley, Fred Voros and Todd Compton all wrote defense of the democrat party and why the church tells them to vote democrat. Comptons spiritual roots of democratic party, Nibley called vote LDS and Voros what he wrote in trib I seen it before. There essays better describe them then the party.

Here is there common denominator. Members are farther to the right than the church on abortion. They think so. Criticize Mining drilling and logging saying it rapes the earth for profit. Never mind that what we get from the earth the Lord gave us and is essential for human survival. besides the church owns many mining operations. And how would the brethern get to STake Conference or give us General Conference without minng and drilling.

Need to care for the poor and Democrats have the right way. Don't mention agency or twist it around. Say affirmative action is gospel prinicple though the Lord is no respector of persons. Go on in some cases about gun control and animal rights though the church is not against all hunting.

If anyone cares to google those three men and democratic party and possibly more you will see a common denominator of LDS Democrats. Thing is they have to defend there position more than LDS Republicans. Also any prominent Republican was embarrasment to church. Some common things they say.

[jay santos]

How about Marlin?

[BlueHair]

I've never been able to figure out why so many LDS people are Republican. Joseph Smith seemed to be more of a live and let live type of guy.

[JohnnyLingo]

I've never been able to figure out why so many LDS people are Republican. Joseph Smith seemed to be more of a live and let live type of guy.

Exactly, except that Democrats are just as meddling as Republicans, just on different issues.

[Non Sequitur]

Exactly, except that Democrats are just as meddling as Republicans, just on different issues.

I think if Joseph Smith were alive today, he'd be a democrat. Brigham Young would probably have a show on FoxNews.

[BlueHair]

Exactly, except that Democrats are just as meddling as Republicans, just on different issues.

Being Libertarian, I see huge flaws in both parties. Both parties meddle, but the Republican meddling seems mean spirited while the Democratic meddling seems to be at least compassionate, although misdirected.

[JohnnyLingo]

Being Libertarian, I see huge flaws in both parties. Both parties meddle, but the Republican meddling seems mean spirited while the Democratic meddling seems to be at least compassionate, although misdirected.

So Joseph Smith was a compassionate meddler. Got it.

[Hallelujah]

Being Libertarian, I see huge flaws in both parties. Both parties meddle, but the Republican meddling seems mean spirited while the Democratic meddling seems to be at least compassionate, although misdirected.

Putting the country in record debt is compassionate? If they are so compassionate, why don't they contribute more to charitable causes?

If I remember correctly, republican states are more charitable. Look at Biden. He donated $250 to charitable causes just prior to running for VP. Sounds pretty compassionate.

[KillerDog]

Being Libertarian, I see huge flaws in both parties. Both parties meddle, but the Republican meddling seems mean spirited while the Democratic meddling seems to be at least compassionate, although misdirected.

I don't see any difference except in the area they think it is appropriate to meddle. Republicans think the government can tell you what pills to take, Democrats think they can take your neighbors money to pay for the pills.

[Non Sequitur]

Being Libertarian, I see huge flaws in both parties. Both parties meddle, but the Republican meddling seems mean spirited while the Democratic meddling seems to be at least compassionate, although misdirected.

I used to identify with Libertarians. Used to consider myself a Libertarian. At some point, though, I realized that being Libertarian was just an excuse for being politically lazy. Now I'm an independent, which, to be truthful, is just a Libertarian, but without all the drugs.

[jay santos]

I used to identify with Libertarians. Used to consider myself a Libertarian. At some point, though, I realized that being Libertarian was just an excuse for being politically lazy. Now I'm an independent, which, to be truthful, is just a Libertarian, but without all the drugs.

I just admit I'm lazy politically. I think the Rep's are a 55 and Dem's are 45 on a scale of 1 to 100 communism vs anarchy. The president always moves to a 50, and the fighting between the two parties keeps the gov from passing too many bills. So while I think the political system is largely a joke, I think it actually works pretty well.

[Viking]

Putting the country in record debt is compassionate? If they are so compassionate, why don't they contribute more to charitable causes?

If I remember correctly, republican states are more charitable. Look at Biden. He donated $250 to charitable causes just prior to running for VP. Sounds pretty compassionate.

Your party got us into this mess, dipshit

[byu71]

Your party got us into this mess, dipshit

Come on Viking. Don't make assinine statements just so you can swear at exie.

[Viking]

Come on Viking. Don't make assinine statements just so you can swear at exie.

So who oversaw this? Serious.

[byu71]

So who oversaw this? Serious.

Politicians and financial genius's. The idiocy, greed and power quest is not unique to one party.

There is some serious blundering and crap going on right now, IMHO, under a different political party. The incest amongst all of them is rampant (perhaps over stated for effect).

There was a shining time, again my opinion. It was when Bill Clinton became a pragmatist under the weight of a fiscally conservative republican congress. Sadly, that time period was short.