Shooting at Ft. Hood

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Moliere
    One man.....one pie
    • Oct 2009
    • 27849

    #31
    Originally posted by I.J. Reilly View Post
    That's the answer, more guns.
    I don't think he said we needed more guns, just allow people to carry their guns on an Army base.
    "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

    Comment

    • Bo Diddley
      Senior
      • Jul 2012
      • 18767

      #32
      Originally posted by I.J. Reilly View Post
      That's the answer, more guns.
      In the end, it was someone who responded with a gun (meeting force with equal force) who was able to bring an end to the bloodshed. Of course it took 15 minutes for someone with a gun to get there...

      The guns are already out there, and if you tell the rational actors that they can't use them, you're only going to be left with the irrational actors using them.

      Comment

      • smokymountainrain
        Impressive Member
        • Nov 2008
        • 22593

        #33
        Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
        In the end, it was someone who responded with a gun (meeting force with equal force) who was able to bring an end to the bloodshed. Of course it took 15 minutes for someone with a gun to get there...

        The guns are already out there, and if you tell the rational actors that they can't use them, you're only going to be left with the irrational actors using them.
        So in this particular case, I guess you could say yes, the answer was indeed, more guns.

        (edit), but I thought I read the shooter committed suicide. hmmm
        Last edited by smokymountainrain; 04-04-2014, 09:40 AM.
        I'm like LeBron James.
        -mpfunk

        Comment

        • Bo Diddley
          Senior
          • Jul 2012
          • 18767

          #34
          Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
          So in this particular case, I guess you could say yes, the answer was indeed, more guns.
          So how many cases of mass shootings are NOT ended by guns?

          Comment

          • smokymountainrain
            Impressive Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 22593

            #35
            Originally posted by Bo Diddley View Post
            So how many cases of mass shootings are NOT ended by guns?
            With that comment, I think I was on your side.

            Having said that, did I misunderstand what really ended the bloodshed? Did the shooter not commit suicide?
            I'm like LeBron James.
            -mpfunk

            Comment

            • creekster
              It is NOT a monkey!
              • Nov 2008
              • 22661

              #36
              Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
              With that comment, I think I was on your side.

              Having said that, did I misunderstand what really ended the bloodshed? Did the shooter not commit suicide?
              I read a report stating that once he was confronted with a drawn handgun the shooter turned his own gun on himself.
              PLesa excuse the tpyos.

              Comment

              • Bo Diddley
                Senior
                • Jul 2012
                • 18767

                #37
                Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
                With that comment, I think I was on your side.

                Having said that, did I misunderstand what really ended the bloodshed? Did the shooter not commit suicide?
                Just extending the argument.

                And yes, like many other mass shooters, he took his life AFTER being met with deadly force.

                Comment

                • Omaha 680
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 11175

                  #38
                  Originally posted by smokymountainrain View Post
                  With that comment, I think I was on your side.

                  Having said that, did I misunderstand what really ended the bloodshed? Did the shooter not commit suicide?
                  I think I read that as well, but I'm not positive. However, it seems in most cases of mass shootings, the gunman turns his weapon on himself when only when the guns are closing in. Whether the shooter kills himself or is taken out by someone else is irrelevant in those cases. The point is it won't end until he is confronted with equal or greater force than he has.

                  Comment

                  • Omaha 680
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 11175

                    #39
                    Bo and Creekster beat me to it. But it is an important point. These mass shooters are clearly delusional and have a picture in their minds of how their shooting will go. Someone standing up and firing back is not a part of the script and they usually kill themselves immediately when that happens. The vast majority of these guys are not interested in a gun battle.

                    Edit: Case in point is this guy from Oregon a couple years back.



                    The shooter had an AR and had already killed two people. He jams his rifle and a citizen confronts him with a drawn handgun. The citizen never fired, but when the gunman cleared his jam he promptly put one bullet through his head instead of taking on the handgun.
                    Last edited by Omaha 680; 04-04-2014, 09:58 AM.

                    Comment

                    • smokymountainrain
                      Impressive Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 22593

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Omaha 680 View Post
                      I think I read that as well, but I'm not positive. However, it seems in most cases of mass shootings, the gunman turns his weapon on himself when only when the guns are closing in. Whether the shooter kills himself or is taken out by someone else is irrelevant in those cases. The point is it won't end until he is confronted with equal or greater force than he has.
                      Makes sense. Thanks for clarifying that point.
                      I'm like LeBron James.
                      -mpfunk

                      Comment

                      • Surfah
                        Where's Wallace?
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 33726

                        #41
                        From earlier this year:

                        Dallas County authorities say the customer who shot and killed a gun-wielding man inside an Orrville dollar store had a valid concealed carry permit.
                        "Nobody listens to Turtle."
                        -Turtle
                        sigpic

                        Comment

                        • Uncle Ted
                          The Big 12 money shot.
                          • Apr 2010
                          • 28853

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Moliere View Post
                          I don't think he said we needed more guns, just allow people to carry their guns on an Army base.
                          "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                          "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                          "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                          GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                          Comment

                          Working...