Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whistleblower - Ensign Peak Advisors

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brian
    replied
    Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
    Exactly! My personal preference is to avoid the ones with bad breath and BO, or a penchant to talk too much as well.
    And yet you have 9,325 posts here..

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    Originally posted by myboynoah View Post
    Well, then those investment managers should take an exit along with former Bro Nielson. The DJIA itself rose at an average of around 6% each year since around 1997. A monkey with a typewriter could have turned $12 billion into $100 billion under those annual returns.
    ...unless they weren’t keeping all of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied
    And if it really is only $40 billion, I'm walking a little less proudly today as a member of The Church. SAD!

    Leave a comment:


  • myboynoah
    replied
    Originally posted by All-American View Post
    A response piece in the Deseret News suggested it’s actually under $40B.
    Well, then those investment managers should take an exit along with former Bro Nielson. The DJIA itself rose at an average of around 6% each year since around 1997. A monkey with a typewriter could have turned $12 billion into $100 billion under those annual returns.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by All-American View Post
    A response piece in the Deseret News suggested it’s actually under $40B.
    Yeah, I saw that. Seems much more reasonable.

    Leave a comment:


  • All-American
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Good question.

    How solid is this $100B number? I am hearing people cast serious doubt.
    A response piece in the Deseret News suggested it’s actually under $40B.

    Leave a comment:


  • UVACoug
    replied
    Originally posted by Flystripper View Post
    retail investments...as one who works for a firm that is closing most of the retail establishments worldwide my view is that this this probably wasn't a great long-term fiscal decision. Good thing there are plenty of reserves!
    It would be interesting to know how much they really have into the retail side of things. I read somewhere (maybe here) that their investment was only in the residential/office side of things. I doubt that is entirely true, but I do wonder how exposed they are to losses on the mall part. There is a lot more than retail that is going on at City Creek. The Church is building a new 25-story office building across State street by Harmon's, which is also technically part of City Creek too I believe. I also think there were originally plans for some additional condos, but I'm not sure if that is still in the works or has been abandoned. There are a lot of people that work very close to the mall and the food court is always packed during the day. If the retail ultimately fails, I'm sure they'll find something useful to do with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Walter Sobchak
    replied
    Originally posted by Donuthole View Post
    The biggest takeaway of all of this is that the church has more than enough money to pay to have the churches professionally cleaned. And it's not not really a takeaway, as we all knew that anyway. But seriously, we give up most of our Sunday and 10% of our income. Let's just pay someone to clean the building and clean it well. Because let's face it--the churches were a lot cleaner back when they were being cleaned by someone who was getting paid to do it.

    /gripe
    raises left hand to the square, bows head, and says: YES!

    I'm a great believer in hoarding cash (or cash equivalents), but I pay professionals to clean our home... the Church should too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
    But how much is enough to stockpile? I don't think it is too much to ask for a little visibility into what the goals and plans are. $100B is a ton of freaking money. Are they waiting to get to $200B and then we will see significant outlays? What is the ultimate goal here?
    Good question.

    How solid is this $100B number? I am hearing people cast serious doubt.

    Leave a comment:


  • imanihonjin
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    Imagine that your neighbor dies and everyone blames you, but the next year you provide the critical funding that results in a cure for the ailment.
    But how much is enough to stockpile? I don't think it is too much to ask for a little visibility into what the goals and plans are. $100B is a ton of freaking money. Are they waiting to get to $200B and then we will see significant outlays? What is the ultimate goal here?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by MartyFunkhouser View Post
    That is my recollection of it as well. The Gateway didn't start dying until after City Creek went in. Basically, the blight was right on the doorstep of Temple Square, so the LDS church invested to push the blight elsewhere. It then went to Gateway. I'm not being critical of the church for this decision and it wasn't anything nefarious. It makes good sense to them to keep the area surrounding Temple Square nice.
    Yeah for sure. I think the primary motivation of City Creek was to revitalize the temple square area. No doubt about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Lebowski
    replied
    Originally posted by Green Monstah View Post
    Yes and no. Imagine you're hoarding a fortune for a time that you can use it for good. While you're waiting for your Good Samaritan moment, your neighbors are dying from an ailment that is treatable (at significant cost), but you withhold your funds for a time when "it's really needed." Is the hoarding moral? Is this a sin of omission? It's definitely not cut and dried, but it certain raises moral questions.
    Imagine that your neighbor dies and everyone blames you, but the next year you provide the critical funding that results in a cure for the ailment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Green Monstah
    replied
    Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
    I know. People want to worship Jesus without being bothered by those dastardly homeless folks.
    Also, I saw lots of homeless people at City Creek. They were hanging out where the mall crosses a road. Talk about a backfire.

    Leave a comment:


  • Green Monstah
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
    The ultimate determination of the morality of the money hoarding will depend on what they eventually do with it, no?
    Yes and no. Imagine you're hoarding a fortune for a time that you can use it for good. While you're waiting for your Good Samaritan moment, your neighbors are dying from an ailment that is treatable (at significant cost), but you withhold your funds for a time when "it's really needed." Is the hoarding moral? Is this a sin of omission? It's definitely not cut and dried, but it certain raises moral questions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Art Vandelay
    replied
    Originally posted by imanihonjin View Post
    I know. People want to worship Jesus without being bothered by those dastardly homeless folks.
    Exactly! My personal preference is to avoid the ones with bad breath and BO, or a penchant to talk too much as well.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X