My wife has a monthly book club with some other female members of the ward and a few non-LDS friends. They met recently to discuss Kate Braestrup's book Here if You Need Me, which is a pretty awesome account of her personal story as a Unitarian Universalist minister whose husband died, leaving her with four young children.
Anyway, this book club has some very intelligent, well-educated women in it (all college grads, a few with Ivy League graduate degrees, etc) and my wife says that most of the LDS women at the book club dismissed a lot of Braestrup's advice and insights with comments like, "Isn't it amazing how she doesn't even understand the basics of the Plan of Salvation?" and "Unitarian Universalists hate Mormons."
Rather than being open to learning something from the book, their attitude was basically one of condescension and pity because this author has not been blessed to be a member of the "only true Church."
Anyway, it just reminded me of how many educated LDS people are strangely arrogant about their "knowledge" of God and of His ways. I think too many of us (myself included) are too quick to dismiss insights from non-LDS sources. Maybe we're especially quick to dismiss non-LDS sources that deal with issues of religion and death, as Braestrup's book does.
Anyway, this book club has some very intelligent, well-educated women in it (all college grads, a few with Ivy League graduate degrees, etc) and my wife says that most of the LDS women at the book club dismissed a lot of Braestrup's advice and insights with comments like, "Isn't it amazing how she doesn't even understand the basics of the Plan of Salvation?" and "Unitarian Universalists hate Mormons."
Rather than being open to learning something from the book, their attitude was basically one of condescension and pity because this author has not been blessed to be a member of the "only true Church."
Anyway, it just reminded me of how many educated LDS people are strangely arrogant about their "knowledge" of God and of His ways. I think too many of us (myself included) are too quick to dismiss insights from non-LDS sources. Maybe we're especially quick to dismiss non-LDS sources that deal with issues of religion and death, as Braestrup's book does.

Comment