Are liberals hypocrits about religion?
Collapse
X
-
Are liberals hypocrits about religion?
When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
--Jonathan SwiftTags: None
-
-
I am living rent free in SU's head these days. Go figure."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
Yes, unless the religion in question is kindness.Jesus wants me for a sunbeam.
"Cog dis is a bitch." -James Patterson
Comment
-
-
Yes, liberals are hypocrites about religion. I've said it before on CS but I'll repeat it again. The Muslim religion is much more bigoted and hurtful to women and gays than Christianity and Judaism. Why liberals embrace the Muslims while disparaging other religions is beyond me.
Also, Affleck is a dunce and a good example of why Hollywood celebrities should stick to acting."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
That's a heluva strawman you just built.Originally posted by Moliere View PostYes, liberals are hypocrites about religion. I've said it before on CS but I'll repeat it again. The Muslim religion is much more bigoted and hurtful to women and gays than Christianity and Judaism. Why liberals embrace the Muslims while disparaging other religions is beyond me.
Also, Affleck is a dunce and a good example of why Hollywood celebrities should stick to acting.Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.
Comment
-
Sheesh. I could watch that video and just as easily said that liberals hate Muslim ideology, since there were 2 liberals arguing against Affleck.Originally posted by Moliere View PostYes, liberals are hypocrites about religion. I've said it before on CS but I'll repeat it again. The Muslim religion is much more bigoted and hurtful to women and gays than Christianity and Judaism. Why liberals embrace the Muslims while disparaging other religions is beyond me.
Also, Affleck is a dunce and a good example of why Hollywood celebrities should stick to acting."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
Are liberals hypocrits about religion?
Maher clearly thinks he's in the minority on this issue on the liberal side. I'm not sure the number of commentators has anything to do with anything. If Maher thought he is in the majority he wouldn't be begging for other liberals to join him.Originally posted by Northwestcoug View PostSheesh. I could watch that video and just as easily said that liberals hate Muslim ideology, since there were 2 liberals arguing against Affleck."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Not sure who you are referring to as the liberal in that debate. Maher appeared to be condemning Islam (the religion) as a whole because of several of the ideas espoused by it (or sects there of) and/or many of its members. Affleck seemed to be saying that you cannot condemn Islam (the people) because the majority live peaceful and productive lives. I do think that they were talking past each other a bit.
There is a poster on here that sounds a lot like Maher in regards to Mormonism ("It's evil"). Although the majority of its members live peaceful and productive lives.
So at what point can you condemn a people based on the view of their beliefs/teachings or on the actions of a minority of the group? Does this only apply to religion or can we apply it to governments, businesses, universities, sports teams, etc.?"Friendship is the grand fundamental principle of Mormonism" - Joseph Smith Jr.
Comment
-
Many Mormons live peaceful lives, however a majority of mormons want to push legislation to deny rights to gays."Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
I know the standard conservative argument about liberals ignoring Muslim atrocities and focusing on Christian peccadilloes. I'm not unsympathetic to it. But I just don't see a majority of liberals doing that. What's more, it's the media highlighting those atrocities. You have a few boneheads like Affleck who grab the spotlight, but I think there's a rather large middle ground of both the left and right that can clearly judge between Christian and Muslim problems.Originally posted by Moliere View PostMaher clearly thinks he's in the minority on this issue on the liberal side. I'm not sure the number of commentators has anything to do with anything. If Maher thought he is in the majority he wouldn't be begging for other liberals to join him."...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
"You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
- SeattleUte
Comment
-
-
I haven't seen any polls on this recently. Have any data to share?Originally posted by Moliere View PostMany Mormons live peaceful lives, however a majority of mormons want to push legislation to deny rights to gays.Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.
Dig your own grave, and save!
"The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American
"I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally
GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!
Comment
Comment