My wife, Primary Pres, has been having a pill of a time with a new bishopric and callings. Without belaboring the story, let's just say that a counselor told her today that this counselor was released on June 11th, given a new calling (YW2nd), accepted, but was waiting for it to happen in Sacrament. She told my wife that she wishes she could "just do the nursery and nothing else."
My wife, meantime, a week later, gets told by the bishop that they're going to release this counselor due to "fertility issues" and how being in the Primary is hard for her.
Anyway, my wife is furious that she had to act like she didn't know anything for a few weeks, and that she couldn't go to her counselors and pray about who to get to replace her. I don't care about all of the drama, really. I'm just wondering why we have to keep callings so secret in our Church.
In this case, there is no current YW2nd (she got called as Stake YWP), so there's no toes to step on. But, that problem could easily be fixed by not telling the replacement until after the other has been released.
I've heard people try and say that you don't have the calling until you're sustained, but that's poppycock. Our sustaining vote is the epitome of perfunctory, and if we all voted no, the person would still get the calling. I don't see a reason why we keep them secret unless is vestigial from Nauvoo and not wanting to get a line of people griping beforehand about it before a real vote. Help me out here.
My wife, meantime, a week later, gets told by the bishop that they're going to release this counselor due to "fertility issues" and how being in the Primary is hard for her.

Anyway, my wife is furious that she had to act like she didn't know anything for a few weeks, and that she couldn't go to her counselors and pray about who to get to replace her. I don't care about all of the drama, really. I'm just wondering why we have to keep callings so secret in our Church.
In this case, there is no current YW2nd (she got called as Stake YWP), so there's no toes to step on. But, that problem could easily be fixed by not telling the replacement until after the other has been released.
I've heard people try and say that you don't have the calling until you're sustained, but that's poppycock. Our sustaining vote is the epitome of perfunctory, and if we all voted no, the person would still get the calling. I don't see a reason why we keep them secret unless is vestigial from Nauvoo and not wanting to get a line of people griping beforehand about it before a real vote. Help me out here.

Comment