Regardless of how long it actually took to write (maybe it was ~75 days while he was dictating it, maybe it was 3+ years before it was dictated, or something), I've never understood what was so amazing or remarkable about the stories. Levin mentioned "minimal editing", but it contained no punctuation, little capitalization, and many spelling errors. If I sat down and dedicated time to write a story, copied word for word a bunch of stuff from the KJV, and added a lot of "And it came to pass...", I think I could maybe even do it.
For those who dismiss the Book of Mormon, what's your explanation for it?
Collapse
X
-
Then you've never truly written.Originally posted by scottie View PostRegardless of how long it actually took to write (maybe it was ~75 days while he was dictating it, maybe it was 3+ years before it was dictated, or something), I've never understood what was so amazing or remarkable about the stories. Levin mentioned "minimal editing", but it contained no punctuation, little capitalization, and many spelling errors. If I sat down and dedicated time to write a story, copied word for word a bunch of stuff from the KJV, and added a lot of "And it came to pass...", I think I could maybe even do it.
Comment
-
If you're going to use an example, at least go with The Iliad or Anna Karenina.Originally posted by Non Sequitur View PostTo run further amok, James Joyce's Uylsses is a 50. The BoM is a 68 from the white tees on a public course.
I'll agree with you on the literary merit.
But I'm talking about human ability to accomplish a task in a short amount of time, and to do it at a level of quality that's polished. No capitalization or punctuation, and spelling, doesn't matter. Blame Oliver.
If JJ wrote Ulysses in 100 days, then we'd be getting somewhere. But he agonized over word choice for years.
Comment
-
I think it's pretty obvious that it's not an ancient record. The most like explanation for it is that it was written by someone in the early 19th century in 16th-century English. What real evidence is there that it's an ancient record? Chiasmus? I think I could write a BOM equivalent.That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
-
In 100 days?Originally posted by SoonerCoug View PostI think it's pretty obvious that it's not an ancient record. The most like explanation for it is that it was written by someone in the early 19th century in 16th-century English. What real evidence is there that it's an ancient record? Chiasmus? I think I could write a BOM equivalent.
No you couldn't.
Comment
-
The BOM is not a ho-hum accomplishment, but it's not the outer-worldly accomplishment Levin describes it to be.Originally posted by scottie View PostRegardless of how long it actually took to write (maybe it was ~75 days while he was dictating it, maybe it was 3+ years before it was dictated, or something), I've never understood what was so amazing or remarkable about the stories. Levin mentioned "minimal editing", but it contained no punctuation, little capitalization, and many spelling errors. If I sat down and dedicated time to write a story, copied word for word a bunch of stuff from the KJV, and added a lot of "And it came to pass...", I think I could maybe even do it.
There are master storytellers who achieve something similar in some stories told. Joseph could spin a yarn and captivate an audience, so it is not beyond comprehension that he was such a storyteller. OTOH, we can leave open the possibility he had some supernatural assistance. At least for sake of argument. Both sides seem dismissive of the argument of the other."Guitar groups are on their way out, Mr Epstein."
Upon rejecting the Beatles, Dick Rowe told Brian Epstein of the January 1, 1962 audition for Decca, which signed Brian Poole and the Tremeloes instead.
Comment
-
He put the entire manuscript in his hat and then dictated it in poor cabin lighting?Originally posted by scottie View PostIf he wrote the book before he dictated it, we really have no idea how long it took to write.
Comment
-
I wrote a 200-page dissertation without a single spelling mistake in 14 days (and I don't use spellcheck). And I didn't have the luxury of making things up. It was the product of two years of research, so it was very easy to write fast.Originally posted by Levin View PostIn 100 days?
No you couldn't.
If JS had been contemplating his fables in advance for years, why couldn't he dictate them over a few months?Last edited by SoonerCoug; 09-30-2012, 08:30 PM.That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
-
The entire manuscript would only have to be in the hat if it was dictated in one sitting, which it wasn't right? And we have no idea how good/bad the lighting was.Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostHe put the entire manuscript in his hat and then dictated it in poor cabin lighting?
Comment
-
I think there's something special about creating the written word. It takes much more effort than the other arts. It's not the literary achievement (leave that normative question aside), it's the creation of the work in the amount of time by Joseph.Originally posted by Topper View PostThe BOM is not a ho-hum accomplishment, but it's not the outer-worldly accomplishment Levin describes it to be.
There are master storytellers who achieve something similar in some stories told. Joseph could spin a yarn and captivate an audience, so it is not beyond comprehension that he was such a storyteller. OTOH, we can leave open the possibility he had some supernatural assistance. At least for sake of argument. Both sides seem dismissive of the argument of the other.
And he was 24 years old. Think of it. A 24 year old mad genius who had been plotting it since he was 21.
Comment
-
Yeah it was an incredible accomplishment. Truly impressive. Maybe 1 in a million people could do something like that. But I don't buy the argument that it was impossible without divine assistance. Doesn't seem like it would be impossible for someone as religion-obsessed and intimately familiar with the lexicon, style and content of the KJV Bible as Joseph was.Originally posted by Topper View PostThe BOM is not a ho-hum accomplishment, but it's not the outer-worldly accomplishment Levin describes it to be.
There are master storytellers who achieve something similar in some stories told. Joseph could spin a yarn and captivate an audience, so it is not beyond comprehension that he was such a storyteller. OTOH, we can leave open the possibility he had some supernatural assistance. At least for sake of argument. Both sides seem dismissive of the argument of the other.
Comment
-
With a prodigious educational background to draw upon for such an undertaking.Originally posted by Levin View PostI think there's something special about creating the written word. It takes much more effort than the other arts. It's not the literary achievement (leave that normative question aside), it's the creation of the work in the amount of time by Joseph.
And he was 24 years old. Think of it. A 24 year old mad genius who had been plotting it since he was 21.
Comment
-
Impressive.Originally posted by SoonerCoug View PostI wrote a 200-page dissertation without a single spelling mistake in 14 days (and I don't use spellcheck). And I didn't have the luxury of making things up. It was the product of two years of research, so it was very easy to write fast.
If JS had been contemplating his fables in advance for years, why couldn't he dictate them over a few months?
Did you dictate it to somebody, or go back and edit as you wrote?
Comment
-
I don't think it was a matter of plotting. He was religiously obsessed.Originally posted by Levin View PostI think there's something special about creating the written word. It takes much more effort than the other arts. It's not the literary achievement (leave that normative question aside), it's the creation of the work in the amount of time by Joseph.
And he was 24 years old. Think of it. A 24 year old mad genius who had been plotting it since he was 21.That which may be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence. -C. Hitchens
http://twitter.com/SoonerCoug
Comment
Comment