Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Also from LDSNewsroom on deification

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Also from LDSNewsroom on deification

    He also clarifies the misperception about the Mormon afterlife, noting that Mormons believe God prepared the earth for a time of growth and experience for mankind to eventually learn to become like Himself in terms of His attributes — not His cosmological assets.
    As I have been saying for years, the church is moving away from deification doctrine.

  • #2
    Originally posted by jay santos View Post
    As I have been saying for years, the church is moving away from deification doctrine.
    Bummer. I was in this for making universes without end. I guess I will have to content myself with celestial polygamy.
    "Sure, I fought. I had to fight all my life just to survive. They were all against me. Tried every dirty trick to cut me down, but I beat the bastards and left them in the ditch."

    - Ty Cobb

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jay santos View Post
      As I have been saying for years, the church is moving away from deification doctrine.
      You're supposed to quote one of your earlier posts claiming that and then simply reply "Swish!"

      Comment


      • #4
        Not so fast, Jay. I fully expect this one to be modified as well once BKP gets around to this part of the article.
        "There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
        "It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
        "Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jay santos View Post
          As I have been saying for years, the church is moving away from deification doctrine.
          That's too bad. One of my mission companions favorite pastimes was discussing the details of how he would improve the design of the knee joint once he became exalted.
          PLesa excuse the tpyos.

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm still going to work on new and tasty animals that I can consume as I travel from one world to the next. John Madden's turducken was a nice start.

            Comment


            • #7
              Somewhere Brigham Young is spinning in his grave.
              Awesomeness now has a name. Let me introduce myself.

              Comment


              • #8
                If I can't grow up to be just like my Father, then what's the point?
                "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                  If I can't grow up to be just like my Father, then what's the point?
                  Exactly. And if this doctrine is jettisoned, then how much different will Mormons be than mainstream Christians?
                  "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                  "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                  - SeattleUte

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm surprised that SU hasn't done the alternate thread title on this one after Indy teed it up for him.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by San Juan Sun View Post
                      Bummer. I was in this for making universes without end. I guess I will have to content myself with celestial polygamy.
                      World's without end is very likely a dimensional paradigm, rather than a real estate acquisition mode. Polygamy could very well be dimensional as well, as who'd want all their wives together when you go to dinner. One thing we do know is that God is a man, and I'm pretty sure he has our back on all the little details.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Northwestcoug View Post
                        Exactly. And if this doctrine is jettisoned, then how much different will Mormons be than mainstream Christians?
                        We need to get Mitt in office first and then we can reinstate that doctrine.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by RC Vikings View Post
                          We need to get Mitt in office first and then we can reinstate that doctrine.
                          All in good time...
                          "...you pointy-headed autopsy nerd. Do you think it's possible for you to post without using words like "hilarious," "absurd," "canard," and "truther"? Your bare assertions do not make it so. Maybe your reasoning is too stunted and your vocabulary is too limited to go without these epithets."
                          "You are an intemperate, unscientific poster who makes light of very serious matters.”
                          - SeattleUte

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by clackamascoug View Post
                            World's without end is very likely a dimensional paradigm, rather than a real estate acquisition mode. Polygamy could very well be dimensional as well, as who'd want all their wives together when you go to dinner. One thing we do know is that God is a man, and I'm pretty sure he has our back on all the little details.
                            I'm not even sure about that anymore. I'm expecting a press release any day now that says we don't believe God is a man, only that he has personlike attributes (love, compassion, etc.)
                            "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              He also clarifies the misperception about the Mormon afterlife, noting that Mormons believe God prepared the earth for a time of growth and experience for mankind to eventually learn to become like Himself in terms of His attributes — not His cosmological assets.
                              How does this square with D&C 132:19?

                              It is certainly more straightforward to consider thrones, kingdoms, principalities, powers, dominions, "all heights and depths" and "a fulness and a continuation of the seeds forever and ever," as something more asset-like than to "become like" God in terms of his "attributes."

                              How does this square with D&C 132:20 (which, in contrast to the anonymous newsroom blogger's claim, is canonical)?

                              Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; therefore they shall be from everlasting to everlasting, because they continue; then shall they be above all, because all things are subject unto them. Then shall they be as gods, because they have all power, and the angels are subject unto them.
                              As I read D&C 132 with the newsroom "doctrine," the newsroom's statement seems more like D&C 132's idea of "angels" than it does of D&C 132's idea of "gods."
                              Last edited by Sleeping in EQ; 09-01-2012, 10:08 AM.
                              We all trust our own unorthodoxies.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X