A very good friend in my ward found out her best friend died at the age of 29 in a sudden car accident.
In taking upon us baptismal covenants, we take upon us to mourn with those who mourn. I'm reminded, however, of a post I read "On the Cessation of Suffering."
The writer mentioned a mother in her LDS congregation whose teenaged child died in a similarly sudden and terrible car accident as my friend's friend. People in the ward were great in the heat of crisis. What is most shocking is some of the comments people made after the fact:
Is it possible that because of our very belief in the Atonement and in the eternal nature of souls, we sometimes really fail to mourn with those who mourn?
Selfishly, dealing with the grief and suffering of others can be extraordinarily awkward. It's exceedingly difficult to know what to say or do. In response, we somewhat too glibly spout lines about the resurrection and temple covenants binding families together. It's also fairly easy to meet the short-term temporal needs of a person dealing with the death of a loved one. Meals are helpful and make it easier to make the necessary arrangements. I've heard stories of ward members arranging rides to and from the airport when family members come in for the funeral. All helpful, good things.
I'm reminded, however, of the first night after all of our family left town after my mom's funeral. Shock and the necessity to take care of what needed to be taken care of carried us through most of the time immediately after her death and the funeral. We felt bolstered by the presence of so much family. Our ward pitched in a ton.
It was after everything was done, after everybody had left that the true grief came crashing down. My brother and I were both under ten years old, and we all crawled into my dad's bed and just wept for hours.
It is after the crisis phase has passed wherein people are the most vulnerable, the most grief-stricken, and the most desperately in need of support and love. It seems to me that we as Latter-day Saints sometimes aren't the best at dealing with grief and grievers. The attitude that somebody shouldn't be sad because of the miracle of the resurrection doesn't deal with the real issues of human loss.
All that said, I am somewhat at a loss as to help my friend. I recognize her need, and don't have great solutions. I suspect that the world is full of well-meaning but uncertain individuals who are so terrified of doing or saying the wrong thing that they simply do nothing.
In taking upon us baptismal covenants, we take upon us to mourn with those who mourn. I'm reminded, however, of a post I read "On the Cessation of Suffering."
The writer mentioned a mother in her LDS congregation whose teenaged child died in a similarly sudden and terrible car accident as my friend's friend. People in the ward were great in the heat of crisis. What is most shocking is some of the comments people made after the fact:
Over time, however, it was interesting to see some people react to the mother's seemingly prolonged, and still very raw suffering.
"She just needs to move on,"
"She needs to remember that she will see her again"
"She should count her blessings, she was blessed with that sweet spirit for 16 years"
"She just seems to have lost her faith. It is so sad when people let these experiences shake their faith."
After a certain point, for many people, it becomes inconvenient to recognize the existence of suffering. It cuts into having fun, watching The Bachelor, and, dare I say it? Baking cupcakes.
"She just needs to move on,"
"She needs to remember that she will see her again"
"She should count her blessings, she was blessed with that sweet spirit for 16 years"
"She just seems to have lost her faith. It is so sad when people let these experiences shake their faith."
After a certain point, for many people, it becomes inconvenient to recognize the existence of suffering. It cuts into having fun, watching The Bachelor, and, dare I say it? Baking cupcakes.
Selfishly, dealing with the grief and suffering of others can be extraordinarily awkward. It's exceedingly difficult to know what to say or do. In response, we somewhat too glibly spout lines about the resurrection and temple covenants binding families together. It's also fairly easy to meet the short-term temporal needs of a person dealing with the death of a loved one. Meals are helpful and make it easier to make the necessary arrangements. I've heard stories of ward members arranging rides to and from the airport when family members come in for the funeral. All helpful, good things.
I'm reminded, however, of the first night after all of our family left town after my mom's funeral. Shock and the necessity to take care of what needed to be taken care of carried us through most of the time immediately after her death and the funeral. We felt bolstered by the presence of so much family. Our ward pitched in a ton.
It was after everything was done, after everybody had left that the true grief came crashing down. My brother and I were both under ten years old, and we all crawled into my dad's bed and just wept for hours.
It is after the crisis phase has passed wherein people are the most vulnerable, the most grief-stricken, and the most desperately in need of support and love. It seems to me that we as Latter-day Saints sometimes aren't the best at dealing with grief and grievers. The attitude that somebody shouldn't be sad because of the miracle of the resurrection doesn't deal with the real issues of human loss.
All that said, I am somewhat at a loss as to help my friend. I recognize her need, and don't have great solutions. I suspect that the world is full of well-meaning but uncertain individuals who are so terrified of doing or saying the wrong thing that they simply do nothing.
Comment