Question about church attendance requirements

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thesaint258
    aka Benito Hazard
    • Jan 2009
    • 3005

    #1

    Question about church attendance requirements

    For you guys with a Church Handbook: my girlfriend and I want to start going to church with each other, but her bishop has a rule that you have to attend seventy percent of your meetings to be considered active. Is that the Church's rule, or just her bishop's? Could he withhold a temple recommend based on that rule?
    Not that, sickos.
  • doctorcoug
    To Win is to Honor Him
    • Jun 2009
    • 2273

    #2
    Originally posted by thesaint258 View Post
    For you guys with a Church Handbook: my girlfriend and I want to start going to church with each other, but her bishop has a rule that you have to attend seventy percent of your meetings to be considered active. Is that the Church's rule, or just her bishop's? Could he withhold a temple recommend based on that rule?
    I'd find another girl...that type of attendance demanding is surely met with demands for weekly FHE, scripture study, and tunnel singing.
    "Don't expect I'll see you 'till after the race"

    "So where does the power come from to see the race to its end...from within"

    Comment

    • old_gregg
      scaly man fish
      • Nov 2009
      • 16915

      #3
      how many steps does her bishop let members take on sundays?
      Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

      Comment

      • Non Sequitur
        Where did I put my bodkin
        • Nov 2008
        • 5773

        #4
        Do most other Churches take attendance?
        "The mind is not a boomerang. If you throw it too far it will not come back." ~ Tom McGuane

        Comment

        • Slim
          Straight Out the Trailer
          • Jul 2009
          • 1007

          #5
          I don't have a church handbook of instruction but when my gf (now wife) and I were attending church together my bishop made me come to my wardrobe once a month.

          Comment

          • CardiacCoug
            вот так штука
            • Nov 2008
            • 11013

            #6
            Originally posted by thesaint258 View Post
            For you guys with a Church Handbook: my girlfriend and I want to start going to church with each other, but her bishop has a rule that you have to attend seventy percent of your meetings to be considered active. Is that the Church's rule, or just her bishop's? Could he withhold a temple recommend based on that rule?
            Probably a dumb question, but couldn't you both just go to her ward all the time? I guess your plan was to alternate wards huh?

            By this definition, my Bishop would be considered inactive. Between conferences/vacations and being on-call as a physician he would probably be slightly under 70%.

            I'm pretty sure attending once per month or more is a more formal definition of Church activity.

            Comment

            • thesaint258
              aka Benito Hazard
              • Jan 2009
              • 3005

              #7
              Originally posted by Non Sequitur View Post
              Do most other Churches take attendance?
              I know my ward doesn't.

              Originally posted by CardiacCoug View Post
              Probably a dumb question, but couldn't you both just go to her ward all the time? I guess your plan was to alternate wards huh?

              By this definition, my Bishop would be considered inactive. Between conferences/vacations and being on-call as a physician he would probably be slightly under 70%.

              I'm pretty sure attending once per month or more is a more formal definition of Church activity.
              Yeah, the plan was to alternate wards, but her bishop's policy is killing that idea. Her bishop has never articulated the consequences for violating the policy, but she's worried that she might not be able to renew her temple recommend. We'll probably modify our plan because she doesn't want to make waves, but I don't think he can deny her a temple recommend based on his own idea of what "active" means.
              Not that, sickos.

              Comment

              • Green Monstah
                Royal Rooter
                • Aug 2010
                • 13945

                #8
                Originally posted by thesaint258 View Post
                For you guys with a Church Handbook: my girlfriend and I want to start going to church with each other, but her bishop has a rule that you have to attend seventy percent of your meetings to be considered active. Is that the Church's rule, or just her bishop's? Could he withhold a temple recommend based on that rule?
                I was asked to leave an Institute class at the Mesa Community College institute building b/c the teacher was bragging (I can't think of a better word) that he withheld the TR of a young man who was going to church at his fiancee's ward. They had to postpone their wedding, etc. He was so damn proud of himself, and, the words "You are the biggest idiot I've ever met" came out of my mouth. So, while I'm sure there are sane priesthood leaders in your area, I'd definitely check on that.
                Jesus wants me for a sunbeam.

                "Cog dis is a bitch." -James Patterson

                Comment

                • falafel
                  loves to talk on things
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 37950

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Slim View Post
                  I don't have a church handbook of instruction but when my gf (now wife) and I were attending church together my bishop made me come to my wardrobe once a month.
                  Sounds sexual.
                  Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                  Dig your own grave, and save!

                  "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                  "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                  GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                  Comment

                  • old_gregg
                    scaly man fish
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 16915

                    #10
                    Originally posted by falafel View Post
                    Sounds sexual.
                    it's not, they were making regular trips to narnia.
                    Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est.

                    Comment

                    • Uncle Ted
                      The Big 12 money shot.
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 28853

                      #11
                      The only question I can recall about attendance when getting a TR is:

                      Do you strive to keep the covenants you have made, to attend your sacrament and other meetings, and to keep your life in harmony with the laws and commandments of the gospel?
                      So I guess a bishop could be a hardass and hold you from getting a TR if he thinks you are not attending enough. As for 70% I have never heard that figured kicked around. It sounds like a benchmark that your bishop came up with.

                      IMHO, with single adults bishops and SPs should be happy that young single adults are attending any ward/stake especially if they are in the dating/marriage mood than if they are attending their ward considering the inactivity rate, etc. of this demographic.
                      "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                      "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                      "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                      Comment

                      • thesaint258
                        aka Benito Hazard
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 3005

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post

                        IMHO, with single adults bishops and SPs should be happy that young single adults are attending any ward/stake especially if they are in the dating/marriage mood than if they are attending their ward considering the inactivity rate, etc. of this demographic.
                        Apparently, that makes too much sense for some people.
                        Not that, sickos.

                        Comment

                        • byu71
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 22070

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Uncle Ted View Post
                          The only question I can recall about attendance when getting a TR is:



                          So I guess a bishop could be a hardass and hold you from getting a TR if he thinks you are not attending enough. As for 70% I have never heard that figured kicked around. It sounds like a benchmark that your bishop came up with.

                          IMHO, with single adults bishops and SPs should be happy that young single adults are attending any ward/stake especially if they are in the dating/marriage mood than if they are attending their ward considering the inactivity rate, etc. of this demographic.

                          Following the BYU model, kids that age can not be expected to act properly on their own. There has to be a set of rules and serious consequences if those rules are broken.

                          Knowing how college kids are and especially in the 60's when the model was designed, not so sure it isn't a good model if you are in a position to enforce it.

                          Comment

                          • Uncle Ted
                            The Big 12 money shot.
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 28853

                            #14
                            Originally posted by byu71 View Post
                            Following the BYU model, kids that age can not be expected to act properly on their own. There has to be a set of rules and serious consequences if those rules are broken.

                            Knowing how college kids are and especially in the 60's when the model was designed, not so sure it isn't a good model if you are in a position to enforce it.
                            Yes, setting boundaries with kids is good.

                            I heard that our SP gets a report of home teachers that haven't been home teaching during the last quarter. Therefore, I do my home teaching (at least) once a quarter.
                            "If there is one thing I am, it's always right." -Ted Nugent.
                            "I honestly believe saying someone is a smart lawyer is damning with faint praise. The smartest people become engineers and scientists." -SU.
                            "Yet I still see wisdom in that which Uncle Ted posts." -creek.
                            GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                            Comment

                            • Paperback Writer
                              Signature won a Pulitzer
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 5211

                              #15
                              A tale of two Bishops

                              Originally posted by RedSox View Post
                              I was asked to leave an Institute class at the Mesa Community College institute building b/c the teacher was bragging (I can't think of a better word) that he withheld the TR of a young man who was going to church at his fiancee's ward. They had to postpone their wedding, etc. He was so damn proud of himself, and, the words "You are the biggest idiot I've ever met" came out of my mouth. So, while I'm sure there are sane priesthood leaders in your area, I'd definitely check on that.
                              My BYU Bishop coerced me to attend his ward every week during my engagement. My wife and I met while in a previous ward but we didn't start dating steadliy until I moved to be closer to campus. I was attending my new (assigned) ward about every other week but that wasn't good enough for this Bishop and he denied me a TR.

                              When I notified this Bishop that my offical records were still in my home ward back in Nebraska and that I would be getting my temple recommend from my home ward/stake he threatened not to sign my ecclesiastical endorsement for the following academic year so I wouldn't be able to register for classes. I thought about moving out of his ward and back into my old ward but, in the end, decided it was less hassle just to attend my assigned ward every week.

                              As a result, I ended up attending two blocks of meeting that semester since my (our) "old" Bishop wanted to see us every week. This Bishop had a good relationship with both of us; particularly my wife as he had been her Bishop for several years and had shepherded her from being totally inactive to being temple worthy.

                              Meanwhile, my assigned Bishop was quite proud that he forced me to attend his ward. In the end, he signed my TR and EE and I was able to keep our wedding date in the SLC temple and stay enrolled at BYU.
                              “Not the victory but the action. Not the goal but the game. In the deed the glory.”
                              "All things are measured against Nebraska." falafel

                              Comment

                              Working...