Eternal Families

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sleeping in EQ
    Philosopher of Men
    • Nov 2008
    • 4188

    #1

    Eternal Families

    Please vote!
    31
    Promise
    67.74%
    21
    Threat
    32.26%
    10
    We all trust our own unorthodoxies.
  • clackamascoug
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 9709

    #2
    Define "Eternal Family."

    Do you mean a bunch of 25 year olds having a past link that was so long ago, that it's difficult to remember why your an eternal family in the first place. That One?

    Comment

    • jay santos
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 13652

      #3
      Most people seem to be able to pick aspects of the gospel they feel very certain about and some that are iffy. I'm sure even very orthodox members have things they say "well I think we just don't know much about that", even though the matter might have spelled out at some point in time by some church leader.

      So take what is promising and discard what is threatening.

      Comment

      • Moliere
        One man.....one pie
        • Oct 2009
        • 27840

        #4
        Living the commandments gets you into the Celestial Kingdom: Promise or threat?
        "Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf

        Comment

        • byu71
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 22070

          #5
          Originally posted by Sleeping in EQ View Post
          Please vote!
          I voted promise, but I will admit through my long sojourn as a member of the LDS church, I have had eternal life, celestial kingdom, good health, riches, et. al. both based on priniciples of the gospel, used by one person via the promise method and another person via the threat method.

          I myself respond better to the promise method. I think the only time I spoke out in Priesthood in a negative manner to another brother was when this rather fat member who was always preaching to others called out those who drank diet coke.

          I just raised my hand and said, the only way we know if someone is keeping the word of wisdom is if we know they "walk and not be weary and run and not faint" or however it goes. I heard a few mumble true, true. My chubby friend said nothing.

          Comment

          • RobinFinderson
            Banned
            • Nov 2008
            • 10548

            #6
            Originally posted by byu71 View Post
            I voted promise, but I will admit through my long sojourn as a member of the LDS church, I have had eternal life, celestial kingdom, good health, riches, et. al. both based on priniciples of the gospel, used by one person via the promise method and another person via the threat method.

            I myself respond better to the promise method. I think the only time I spoke out in Priesthood in a negative manner to another brother was when this rather fat member who was always preaching to others called out those who drank diet coke.

            I just raised my hand and said, the only way we know if someone is keeping the word of wisdom is if we know they "walk and not be weary and run and not faint" or however it goes. I heard a few mumble true, true. My chubby friend said nothing.
            Actually, if someone 'walks without weariness and runs without being faint,' you can not conclude that they live the word of wisdom. Those blessing may be attained by some other promise. The contrapositive of the word of wisdom would be: If NOT (walk and not be weary...) then NOT (obeys word of wisdom).

            Don't beat yourself up over this. Religious people get these matters of logic wrong all the time.

            Comment

            • happyone
              Board Bookworm
              • Mar 2009
              • 5394

              #7
              I voted promise, esp with my mother passing this summer.
              Last edited by happyone; 10-12-2010, 12:44 PM.

              I may be small, but I'm slow.

              A veteran - whether active duty, retired, or national guard or reserve is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to, "The United States of America ", for an amount of "up to and including my life - it's an honor."

              Comment

              • byu71
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2008
                • 22070

                #8
                Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                Actually, if someone 'walks without weariness and runs without being faint,' you can not conclude that they live the word of wisdom. Those blessing may be attained by some other promise. The contrapositive of the word of wisdom would be: If NOT (walk and not be weary...) then NOT (obeys word of wisdom).

                Don't beat yourself up over this. Religious people get these matters of logic wrong all the time.
                You got to realize in Priesthood class, at least mine, deep thinkers such as yourself aren't there.

                Most of the class understood what I was saying. "Before you judge the rest of us, perhaps you should lose some weight."

                Comment

                • RobinFinderson
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 10548

                  #9
                  Originally posted by byu71 View Post
                  You got to realize in Priesthood class, at least mine, deep thinkers such as yourself aren't there.

                  Most of the class understood what I was saying. "Before you judge the rest of us, perhaps you should lose some weight."
                  Well, technically the contrapositive of the WOW applied in your case, so the implied meaning, which was "Before you judge the rest of us, perhaps you should lose some weight," was true, even though you fumbled the logic. To some is given the gift to state the contrapositive of all things, and to another is given the gift to know the contrapositive in one's heart, but to fail in speaking it with the lips. You clearly fall into the second category, and there is nothing wrong with that.

                  Comment

                  • byu71
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 22070

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RobinFinderson View Post
                    Well, technically the contrapositive of the WOW applied in your case, so the implied meaning, which was "Before you judge the rest of us, perhaps you should lose some weight," was true, even though you fumbled the logic. To some is given the gift to state the contrapositive of all things, and to another is given the gift to know the contrapositive in one's heart, but to fail in speaking it with the lips. You clearly fall into the second category, and there is nothing wrong with that.
                    You have used to many big words weaved artfully and crafted to confuse an old man. Fear not though, I shall bring the spirit with me tomorrow and we shall yet confound you.

                    Comment

                    • Green Monstah
                      Royal Rooter
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 13934

                      #11
                      "Together Forever" seems like nothing more than a PR campaign to me. Granted, I'd love to be with my wife and kids forever, but it has little basis in scripture, and is overused as a way to get our emotions running.

                      If you're running your own galaxy, making infinite numbers of spirit children, when are you going to have time to sit down for a little celestial FHE?

                      The answer to the question is both. It's a promise given to us, but it's a threat that is often explicitly used to strike fear into those who may wish to step out of line.
                      Jesus wants me for a sunbeam.

                      "Cog dis is a bitch." -James Patterson

                      Comment

                      • statman
                        Rabblerouser
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 2799

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RedSox View Post
                        "Together Forever" seems like nothing more than a PR campaign to me. Granted, I'd love to be with my wife and kids forever, but it has little basis in scripture, and is overused as a way to get our emotions running.

                        If you're running your own galaxy, making infinite numbers of spirit children, when are you going to have time to sit down for a little celestial FHE?

                        The answer to the question is both. It's a promise given to us, but it's a threat that is often explicitly used to strike fear into those who may wish to step out of line.
                        The husband to wife sealing is pretty well explained - eternal increase and all that. The sealing of parents to children is not actually discussed all that much. We know that it's a saving ordinance, and I think we can assume it has something to do with Abraham's Covenant. But, I don't think the ramifications of us all being sealed together have ever really been revealed. We just know that it's important that we do it...

                        Comment

                        • wally
                          <><><><><><><><>
                          • Jun 2010
                          • 4137

                          #13
                          BADUM-CHING!!!! He'll be here all week folks!

                          Comment

                          Working...