Originally posted by RobinFinderson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is this why polygamy gets pinned on BY more often than JS?
Collapse
X
-
Good point. Why would those women and children need a man in their lives?
-
So a husband and father can be replaced by a check every month?Originally posted by RobinFinderson View PostI don't understand all of the concern about abandonment. The church could have easily have dealt with these problem by setting up an organization that would take care of the temporal needs of the 'abandoned' wives and children. The husbands could have paid into the caretaking organization according to the number of women and children for whom they were temporally responsible. It didn't require anyone going to jail or abandoning responsibility.
Comment
-
Yeah, and I bet that father would have been really happy to never live with his kids again. YOu have to remember that polygamists only did it for the sex. THey didn't care about or have any emotional ties to the other wife or the children.Originally posted by Katy Lied View PostSo a husband and father can be replaced by a check every month?
/TIC"Discipleship is not a spectator sport. We cannot expect to experience the blessing of faith by standing inactive on the sidelines any more than we can experience the benefits of health by sitting on a sofa watching sporting events on television and giving advice to the athletes. And yet for some, “spectator discipleship” is a preferred if not primary way of worshipping." -Pres. Uchtdorf
Comment
-
Yea that great emotional connection you have when you have 30 wives and 100 kids all while running the church.Originally posted by Eddie Jones View PostYeah, and I bet that father would have been really happy to never live with his kids again. YOu have to remember that polygamists only did it for the sex. THey didn't care about or have any emotional ties to the other wife or the children.
/TIC
Comment
-
Sure. (assuming I understand your question correctly)Originally posted by Indy Coug View PostJustifiably?
What if you had three kids and you were asked to disown two and keep one. Or serve a relatively short jail term and keep all three. Which would you do?
From what I understand, nobody was prosecuted twice. So once you served your time they left you alone."There is no creature more arrogant than a self-righteous libertarian on the web, am I right? Those folks are just intolerable."
"It's no secret that the great American pastime is no longer baseball. Now it's sanctimony." -- Guy Periwinkle, The Nix.
"Juilliardk N I ibuprofen Hyu I U unhurt u" - creekster
Comment
-
I think the same principles are applied in the church today.Originally posted by mrluchini View PostPretty great example of the moral/ethical relativism that is so warned against in so many conference talks these days.
Specifically, I think that the church sending illegal immigrants on missions is a pretty good parallel. The church certainly doesn't want to deny the young people the opportunity to go on a mission because of decisions that their parents made in bringing them to this country illegally.
Once again, you have to make due when there are no good options to bad situations.
Comment
-
In truth many of them never did live with their wives. My great great grandfather had several families and he didn't live with any of them that I know of. He lived in the Logan temple by himself. I don't think men who had 30+ children participated much in their rearing.Originally posted by Eddie Jones View PostYeah, and I bet that father would have been really happy to never live with his kids again. YOu have to remember that polygamists only did it for the sex. THey didn't care about or have any emotional ties to the other wife or the children.
/TIC
Comment
Comment