SU should like this one.
I'm making some assumptions for this. If you want to haggle over assumptions, that's fine also. But I'm particularly interested in the question whether or not the Honor Code is racist, given this set of assumptions.
Assumptions
1. BYU is aware the pool of offenders committing expulsion worthy offenses is quite large.
2. BYU generally chooses to ignore the large pool of offenders except in cases where the offense becomes known by the general public.
3. The cases that become known to the general public are disproportionately made up of athletes from high profile FB and BB program.
4. Athletes from high profile FB and BB programs are disproportionately represented by minorities especially black and Polynesian.
So, question, does the practice of how BYU polices the Honor Code make it a racist policy?
And for the lawyers, if BYU was the U.S. government, could they be sued for racial and discriminatory practices?
I'm making some assumptions for this. If you want to haggle over assumptions, that's fine also. But I'm particularly interested in the question whether or not the Honor Code is racist, given this set of assumptions.
Assumptions
1. BYU is aware the pool of offenders committing expulsion worthy offenses is quite large.
2. BYU generally chooses to ignore the large pool of offenders except in cases where the offense becomes known by the general public.
3. The cases that become known to the general public are disproportionately made up of athletes from high profile FB and BB program.
4. Athletes from high profile FB and BB programs are disproportionately represented by minorities especially black and Polynesian.
So, question, does the practice of how BYU polices the Honor Code make it a racist policy?
And for the lawyers, if BYU was the U.S. government, could they be sued for racial and discriminatory practices?
Comment