Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you believe the OT "timeline" to be accurate?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Do you believe the OT "timeline" to be accurate?

    Meaning, do you believe in the traditional dates assigned to
    • Adam's eviction from Eden
    • Enoch
    • Noah
    • Abraham
    • Moses


    and so forth?
    18
    Yes, or at least it's really close.
    5.56%
    1
    It could be a lot longer time b/n Adam & Moses
    22.22%
    4
    No. People could never live to be 150 to 969 years old
    33.33%
    6
    No. Most/all of these people never existed.
    33.33%
    6
    No opinion
    5.56%
    1
    Everything in life is an approximation.

    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

  • #2
    Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
    Meaning, do you believe in the traditional dates assigned to
    • Adam's eviction from Eden
    • Enoch
    • Noah
    • Abraham
    • Moses


    and so forth?
    Do this question mean, "Do you believe Adam and Eve lived in about 4,000 BC, and then so on?
    "More crazy people to Provo go than to any other town in the state."
    -- Iron County Record. 23 August, 1912. (http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lc...23/ed-1/seq-4/)

    Comment


    • #3
      I can answer this one.
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.

      --Jonathan Swift

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Solon View Post
        Do this question mean, "Do you believe Adam and Eve lived in about 4,000 BC, and then so on?
        Correct. The relatively standardized timeline dating back a few centuries that established Adam as beginning around 4,004 BC.

        http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/ussher.htm
        Everything in life is an approximation.

        http://twitter.com/CougarStats

        Comment


        • #5
          I always get hung up on the wording of the options.

          Your question asks about timeline yet some of your choices go to the non-existence or literalism of the "characters" in the OT. Are you revealing some bias in your line of questioning or did you simply ask the wrong question?
          Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

          sigpic

          Comment


          • #6
            I can't believe I am the only one with no opinion. I guess I don't care enough about it to have an opinion.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TripletDaddy View Post
              I always get hung up on the wording of the options.

              Your question asks about timeline yet some of your choices go to the non-existence or literalism of the "characters" in the OT. Are you revealing some bias in your line of questioning or did you simply ask the wrong question?
              One of the options is "no" on the basis that the timeline is predicated upon people that never existed.
              Everything in life is an approximation.

              http://twitter.com/CougarStats

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by byu71 View Post
                I can't believe I am the only one with no opinion. I guess I don't care enough about it to have an opinion.
                Test: are you ambivalent or indifferent?
                Fitter. Happier. More Productive.

                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Are we talking about the timeline, or are we talking about the people? This polls seems like it should really be asking "what, if any, opinion do you have about the literal nature of the OT?" and then several options are given.

                  Also, what does length of one's life have to do with whether the time line is correct? As an aside, assuming Methuselah was a real person, I'd like to know what happened to cause the OT to have a reference to him living 969 years. In other words, I don't believe that anyone actually lived that long. People lived shorter lives in antiquity, not longer.
                  Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                  Dig your own grave, and save!

                  "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                  "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                  GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by falafel View Post
                    Also, what does length of one's life have to do with whether the time line is correct?
                    The timeline was reverse engineered based on the reported ages of the Patriarchs.

                    Maybe it was the collective inbreeding of the first few generations that resulted in increasingly shorter lifespans.
                    Everything in life is an approximation.

                    http://twitter.com/CougarStats

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Indy Coug View Post
                      The timeline was reverse engineered based on the reported ages of the Patriarchs.

                      Maybe it was the collective inbreeding of the first few generations that resulted in increasingly shorter lifespans.
                      Thanks. In that case, no way do I believe the time line.
                      Ain't it like most people, I'm no different. We love to talk on things we don't know about.

                      Dig your own grave, and save!

                      "The only one of us who is so significant that Jeff owes us something simply because he decided to grace us with his presence is falafel." -- All-American

                      "I know that you are one of the cool and 'edgy' BYU fans" -- Wally

                      GIVE 'EM HELL, BRIGHAM!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X