Saved by Grace

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jay santos
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 13652

    #1

    Saved by Grace

    http://www.cougarboard.com/nologin/m...tml?id=5134792

    I think maybe I officially hate Mormons.

    It's a beautiful scripture.
  • All-American
    Right, as Usual
    • Nov 2008
    • 15680

    #2
    No question that we over-correct on this one.
    τὸν ἥλιον ἀνατέλλοντα πλείονες ἢ δυόμενον προσκυνοῦσιν

    Comment

    • Babs
      Not a Lawyer
      • Nov 2008
      • 17128

      #3
      There's a reason nobody ever wrote a song called Amazing Works.

      Comment

      • statman
        Rabblerouser
        • Aug 2009
        • 2799

        #4
        A few weeks after I started grad school, my wife and I had dinner with a couple - I knew the husband from school. He is the son of a Baptist minister, born adn raised in Shrieveport, LA, and agnostic, but is very well versed in Evangelical christian doctrine. He went to LSU on scholarship - for their debate team (not an NCAA 'sport' but some endowment paid his tuition.

        We started talking about generic stuff and came to religion - he did not know I was LDS. After a few minutes of discussing grace/works he was pretty sure he'd caught me in a logical loop. I argued that I was being perfectly consistent. He started to explain - "You said X here and Y here. Those two can't fit together, unless..."

        Then he backtracked - "You're LDS aren't you?"

        Yup - we absolutely believe that we are saved by Grace - but our works (combined of course with more Grace) enable the difference between eternal life and exaltation.

        Comment

        • jay santos
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2008
          • 13652

          #5
          Originally posted by statman View Post
          A few weeks after I started grad school, my wife and I had dinner with a couple - I knew the husband from school. He is the son of a Baptist minister, born adn raised in Shrieveport, LA, and agnostic, but is very well versed in Evangelical christian doctrine. He went to LSU on scholarship - for their debate team (not an NCAA 'sport' but some endowment paid his tuition.

          We started talking about generic stuff and came to religion - he did not know I was LDS. After a few minutes of discussing grace/works he was pretty sure he'd caught me in a logical loop. I argued that I was being perfectly consistent. He started to explain - "You said X here and Y here. Those two can't fit together, unless..."

          Then he backtracked - "You're LDS aren't you?"

          Yup - we absolutely believe that we are saved by Grace - but our works (combined of course with more Grace) enable the difference between eternal life and exaltation.
          I don't know if you're saying that Christian doctrine is illogical and Mormon doctrine is logical. That's what most Mormons seem to believe. The reality is that there is not a that big of a difference. Most of the difference is in semantics.

          Comment

          • Tick's wife
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 528

            #6
            In the January 2010 Ensign, pg 16, 4th bullet that says "...the Atonement is not something we earn. It is a gift freely given. The Lord's grace is real....."
            The Ensign is suppose to be "good readings"of the church. If they publish in the Ensign then I'm sure it is approved by the church.

            This is where our house is divided.

            Comment

            • statman
              Rabblerouser
              • Aug 2009
              • 2799

              #7
              Originally posted by jay santos View Post
              I don't know if you're saying that Christian doctrine is illogical and Mormon doctrine is logical. That's what most Mormons seem to believe. The reality is that there is not a that big of a difference. Most of the difference is in semantics.

              No, not illogical, but the two big divisions of Chistiandom have very different and very conflicting beliefs on the subject. In my discussion with my friend, I was arguing from both sides - that both are absolutely necessary.

              And it's not just semantics. Catholics are very task/practice oriented. They actively teach that to focus on faith/grace is a cop-out, and that it will lead people astray. To be saved, you must have the works, period (and think of Catholic 'works' as the LDS definition of 'ordinances,' not just doing good things). Protestants (Baptists, at least) say that focusing on works is 'hollow religion' - that it's your faith and Christ's grace alone that save you. Going to Church, helping the poor, etc do nothing for you unless you're already saved...

              Comment

              • statman
                Rabblerouser
                • Aug 2009
                • 2799

                #8
                Originally posted by Tick's wife View Post
                In the January 2010 Ensign, pg 16, 4th bullet that says "...the Atonement is not something we earn. It is a gift freely given. The Lord's grace is real....."
                The Ensign is suppose to be "good readings"of the church. If they publish in the Ensign then I'm sure it is approved by the church.

                This is where our house is divided.
                That's half of the equation. We must also apply the Atonement to our lives by making and keeping covenants (ordinances). Without these works, we also cannot be saved. And without the Atonement, the ordinances and covenants would be meaningless.

                Ultimately, both grace and making & keeping covenants are absolutely essential to our salvation, and both are dependent upon Christ's atonement.

                Comment

                • Tick's wife
                  Junior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 528

                  #9
                  Originally posted by statman View Post
                  No, not illogical, but the two big divisions of Chistiandom have very different and very conflicting beliefs on the subject. In my discussion with my friend, I was arguing from both sides - that both are absolutely necessary.

                  And it's not just semantics. Catholics are very task/practice oriented. They actively teach that to focus on faith/grace is a cop-out, and that it will lead people astray. To be saved, you must have the works, period (and think of Catholic 'works' as the LDS definition of 'ordinances,' not just doing good things). Protestants (Baptists, at least) say that focusing on works is 'hollow religion' - that it's your faith and Christ's grace alone that save you. Going to Church, helping the poor, etc do nothing for you unless you're already saved...
                  that's crap, my works or any others does not make them any better than the next person and the amount of works doesn't make a person better or more saved than the other.

                  Comment

                  • Donuthole
                    Official Outgayer
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 25278

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Tick's wife View Post
                    that's crap, my works or any others does not make them any better than the next person and the amount of works doesn't make a person better or more saved than the other.
                    Well I guess that settles it. That was a short thread.
                    Prepare to put mustard on those words, for you will soon be consuming them, along with this slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame set at gas mark “egg on your face”! -- Moss

                    There's three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who's got the same first name as a city; and never go near a lady's got a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, everything else is cream cheese. --Coach Finstock

                    Comment

                    • clackamascoug
                      Banned
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 9709

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Tick's wife View Post
                      that's crap, my works or any others does not make them any better than the next person and the amount of works doesn't make a person better or more saved than the other.
                      Maybe works could/should be interpreted as "The Saving Ordinances."

                      Comment

                      • barnes
                        Junior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 8

                        #12
                        Talking to Evangelicals it appears to me that confusion is not faith vs. works but rather sanctification vs. justification

                        Sanctification --> Justification
                        It Mormonism sanctification leads to justification. You are sanctified during baptism and remain sanctified by good works and repentance. Sanctification is a combination of grace, good works, and man’s free-will. Unless you receive your Calling and Election in mortality, one is justified at the judgment seat prior to resurrection. Justification is 100% grace.


                        Justification --> Sanctification
                        To Evangelicals you are justified (again 100% grace) when you proclaim Jesus your savior. Once justified you are then propelled to live a sanctified life. The good works you perform as you live a sanctified life cannot really be attributed to your free-will but because you were chosen to be justified.

                        In both Evangelical and Mormon thought, justification is all grace, and both may say that one is saved at justification, but there appears a big difference to when that happens. Also the role of free-will as one lives a sanctified life also comes to play. Mormons are huge on free-will but it seems that other forms of Christianity are all over the map (for example Calvinism vs. Arminianism).

                        Comment

                        • Tick's wife
                          Junior Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 528

                          #13
                          Originally posted by barnes View Post
                          Talking to Evangelicals it appears to me that confusion is not faith vs. works but rather sanctification vs. justification

                          Sanctification --> Justification
                          It Mormonism sanctification leads to justification. You are sanctified during baptism and remain sanctified by good works and repentance. Sanctification is a combination of grace, good works, and man’s free-will. Unless you receive your Calling and Election in mortality, one is justified at the judgment seat prior to resurrection. Justification is 100% grace.


                          Justification --> Sanctification
                          To Evangelicals you are justified (again 100% grace) when you proclaim Jesus your savior. Once justified you are then propelled to live a sanctified life. The good works you perform as you live a sanctified life cannot really be attributed to your free-will but because you were chosen to be justified.

                          In both Evangelical and Mormon thought, justification is all grace, and both may say that one is saved at justification, but there appears a big difference to when that happens. Also the role of free-will as one lives a sanctified life also comes to play. Mormons are huge on free-will but it seems that other forms of Christianity are all over the map (for example Calvinism vs. Arminianism).
                          good thing my life won't be judged by man but God when I go to the pearly gates.

                          Comment

                          • wuapinmon
                            Soul Plumber
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 30711

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Tick's wife View Post

                            This is where our house is divided.
                            Lemme guess. You're more of an "En-sun" kinda girl, while Tick is a by-the-book En-sign kinda guy?
                            "Wuap's "problem" is that he is smart & principled & committed to a moral course of action. His actions are supposed to reflect his ethical code.
                            The rest of us rarely bother to think about our actions." --Solon

                            Comment

                            • Tick's wife
                              Junior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 528

                              #15
                              Originally posted by wuapinmon View Post
                              Lemme guess. You're more of an "En-sun" kinda girl, while Tick is a by-the-book En-sign kinda guy?
                              actually it is pronounced En-sign, it was stated in the Ensign about 10 yrs ago on the inside front cover. by the book? hmmm, good question. I like to think of myself as having a sense of reality.

                              Comment

                              Working...